Hasil (
Bahasa Indonesia) 1:
[Salinan]Disalin!
3.2.8 Standards guidelines relating to valuations (VS07)
Explanatory notes
The report of an archaeological field evaluation contains a valuation of the archaeological remains. It may, depending on the assignment, also contain selection recommendations but these may also be drawn up separately by an archaeologist from the government body involved.
The valuation is made in the prescribed manner on the basis of the data from an archaeological field evaluation. An assessment is made as to which elements are present which can be used in the valuation of sites and what their quality is. This information is then compared with what is already known on similar sites and/or information on the region and/or the same period.
The valuation as a product is primarily intended to be used by the principal.
Process description
The valuation is made in the prescribed manner on the basis of the data from an archaeological field evaluation.
Products
• Valuation.
Actors
• The Senior Archaeologist performs the valuation.
• The Senior Archaeologist checks whether the valuation has been carried out correctly.
Requirements with regard to resources
Guideline for carrying out a valuation
The valuation forms part of the final report and contains the results of the steps detailed below and the final conclusions concerning the preservation value of find-spots.
Introduction: the phases which make up the valuation process
The valuation process is carried out as a number of steps:
1. Valuation on the basis of perception aspects
In this step, monuments are valued on the basis of criteria which are important with regard to their perception value, that is their ‘aesthetic value’ and ‘historical value’.
2. Valuation on the basis of physical criteria
This valuation is based on the criteria ‘integrity’ and ‘preservation’.
3. Valuation on the basis of intrinsic criteria
In this step, monuments are valued according to their scientific importance. The scientific value is measured on the basis of four criteria: rarity, research potential, context value or group value and representativeness. This criteria are applicable to different spatial scale levels, both at the level of the individual monument and the level of areas in which a number of monuments are located. In addition, the archaeo-region (larger areas within which a certain relation exists in both a genetic and spatial sense between archaeology and landscape) can play an important role.
The following table is a systematic presentation of the criteria. The corresponding reference document describes the groups of steps in the valuation process and the valuation parameters.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..