3.2.8 Standards guidelines relating to valuations (VS07)Explanatory no terjemahan - 3.2.8 Standards guidelines relating to valuations (VS07)Explanatory no Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

3.2.8 Standards guidelines relating

3.2.8 Standards guidelines relating to valuations (VS07)
Explanatory notes
The report of an archaeological field evaluation contains a valuation of the archaeological remains. It may, depending on the assignment, also contain selection recommendations but these may also be drawn up separately by an archaeologist from the government body involved.
The valuation is made in the prescribed manner on the basis of the data from an archaeological field evaluation. An assessment is made as to which elements are present which can be used in the valuation of sites and what their quality is. This information is then compared with what is already known on similar sites and/or information on the region and/or the same period.
The valuation as a product is primarily intended to be used by the principal.

Process description
The valuation is made in the prescribed manner on the basis of the data from an archaeological field evaluation.

Products
• Valuation.

Actors
• The Senior Archaeologist performs the valuation.
• The Senior Archaeologist checks whether the valuation has been carried out correctly.

Requirements with regard to resources
Guideline for carrying out a valuation
The valuation forms part of the final report and contains the results of the steps detailed below and the final conclusions concerning the preservation value of find-spots.

Introduction: the phases which make up the valuation process
The valuation process is carried out as a number of steps:
1. Valuation on the basis of perception aspects
In this step, monuments are valued on the basis of criteria which are important with regard to their perception value, that is their ‘aesthetic value’ and ‘historical value’.
2. Valuation on the basis of physical criteria
This valuation is based on the criteria ‘integrity’ and ‘preservation’.
3. Valuation on the basis of intrinsic criteria
In this step, monuments are valued according to their scientific importance. The scientific value is measured on the basis of four criteria: rarity, research potential, context value or group value and representativeness. This criteria are applicable to different spatial scale levels, both at the level of the individual monument and the level of areas in which a number of monuments are located. In addition, the archaeo-region (larger areas within which a certain relation exists in both a genetic and spatial sense between archaeology and landscape) can play an important role.
The following table is a systematic presentation of the criteria. The corresponding reference document describes the groups of steps in the valuation process and the valuation parameters.





0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
3.2.8 Standards guidelines relating to valuations (VS07)
Explanatory notes
The report of an archaeological field evaluation contains a valuation of the archaeological remains. It may, depending on the assignment, also contain selection recommendations but these may also be drawn up separately by an archaeologist from the government body involved.
The valuation is made in the prescribed manner on the basis of the data from an archaeological field evaluation. An assessment is made as to which elements are present which can be used in the valuation of sites and what their quality is. This information is then compared with what is already known on similar sites and/or information on the region and/or the same period.
The valuation as a product is primarily intended to be used by the principal.

Process description
The valuation is made in the prescribed manner on the basis of the data from an archaeological field evaluation.

Products
• Valuation.

Actors
• The Senior Archaeologist performs the valuation.
• The Senior Archaeologist checks whether the valuation has been carried out correctly.

Requirements with regard to resources
Guideline for carrying out a valuation
The valuation forms part of the final report and contains the results of the steps detailed below and the final conclusions concerning the preservation value of find-spots.

Introduction: the phases which make up the valuation process
The valuation process is carried out as a number of steps:
1. Valuation on the basis of perception aspects
In this step, monuments are valued on the basis of criteria which are important with regard to their perception value, that is their ‘aesthetic value’ and ‘historical value’.
2. Valuation on the basis of physical criteria
This valuation is based on the criteria ‘integrity’ and ‘preservation’.
3. Valuation on the basis of intrinsic criteria
In this step, monuments are valued according to their scientific importance. The scientific value is measured on the basis of four criteria: rarity, research potential, context value or group value and representativeness. This criteria are applicable to different spatial scale levels, both at the level of the individual monument and the level of areas in which a number of monuments are located. In addition, the archaeo-region (larger areas within which a certain relation exists in both a genetic and spatial sense between archaeology and landscape) can play an important role.
The following table is a systematic presentation of the criteria. The corresponding reference document describes the groups of steps in the valuation process and the valuation parameters.





Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
3.2.8 Pedoman Standar yang berkaitan dengan valuasi (VS07)
Penjelasan mencatat
Laporan evaluasi bidang arkeologi berisi penilaian peninggalan arkeologis. Mungkin, tergantung pada tugas, juga mengandung rekomendasi seleksi tetapi ini juga dapat dibuat secara terpisah oleh seorang arkeolog dari badan pemerintah yang terlibat.
valuasi dibuat dengan cara yang ditentukan berdasarkan data dari evaluasi lapangan arkeologi. Penilaian dilakukan untuk unsur-unsur yang hadir yang dapat digunakan dalam penilaian situs dan apa kualitas mereka. Informasi ini kemudian dibandingkan dengan apa yang sudah diketahui di situs dan / atau informasi serupa di daerah dan / atau periode yang sama.
Penilaian sebagai produk terutama dimaksudkan untuk digunakan oleh kepala sekolah. deskripsi Proses penilaian ini dibuat dalam resep cara berdasarkan data dari evaluasi lapangan arkeologi. Produk • Valuasi. Aktor • The Arkeolog Senior melakukan penilaian. • Cek Arkeolog Senior apakah penilaian yang telah dilakukan dengan benar. Persyaratan yang berkaitan dengan sumber daya Pedoman untuk melaksanakan valuasi Bentuk penilaian bagian dari laporan akhir dan berisi hasil rincian langkah di bawah dan kesimpulan akhir tentang nilai pelestarian find-bintik. Pendahuluan: fase yang membentuk proses penilaian Proses penilaian dilakukan sebagai beberapa langkah: 1. Penilaian berdasarkan aspek persepsi Pada langkah ini, monumen dinilai berdasarkan kriteria yang penting berkaitan dengan nilai persepsi mereka, yaitu 'nilai estetika' mereka dan 'nilai sejarah'. 2. Penilaian berdasarkan kriteria fisik penilaian ini didasarkan pada kriteria 'integritas' dan 'pelestarian'. 3. Penilaian berdasarkan kriteria intrinsik Pada langkah ini, monumen dinilai sesuai dengan kepentingan ilmiah mereka. Nilai ilmiah diukur berdasarkan empat kriteria: kelangkaan, potensi penelitian, nilai konteks atau nilai kelompok dan keterwakilan. Kriteria ini berlaku untuk tingkat skala spasial yang berbeda, baik di tingkat monumen individu dan tingkat daerah di mana sejumlah monumen berada. Selain itu, archaeo-wilayah (wilayah yang lebih luas di mana hubungan tertentu ada di kedua arti genetik dan spasial antara arkeologi dan lansekap) dapat memainkan peran penting. Tabel berikut adalah presentasi sistematis kriteria. Dokumen referensi yang sesuai menggambarkan kelompok langkah-langkah dalam proses penilaian dan parameter penilaian.





























Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: