- Teks
- Sejarah
Associations with individuals, even
Associations with individuals, events or groups of historical importance (NSW Heritage Criteria A, B & D).
Archaeological remains may have particular associations with individuals, groups and events which may transform mundane places or objects into significant items through the association with important historical occurrences.
• Does the archaeological site link to any NSW Historic Themes? Will the site contain ‘relics’ and remains which may illustrate a significant pattern in State or local history?
• Is the site widely recognised?
• Does the site have symbolic value?
• Is there a community of interest (past or present) which identifies with, and values the specific site?
• Is the site likely to provide material expression of a particular event or cultural identity?
• Is the site associated with an important person? (the role of the person in State or local history must be demonstrated/known)
• What is the strength of association between the person and the site?
• Did the person live or work at the site? During the phase of their career for which they are most recognised? Is that likely to be evident in the archaeology /physical evidence of the site?
• Did a significant event or discovery take place at the site? Is that evident/or likely to be evident in the archaeology/physical evidence of the site?
Aesthetic or technical significance (NSW Heritage Criterion C).
Whilst the technical value of archaeology is usually considered as ‘research potential’ aesthetic values are not usually considered to be relevant to archaeological sites. This is often because until a site has been excavated, its actual features and attributes may remain unknown. It is also because aesthetic is often interpreted to mean attractive, as opposed to the broader sense of sensory perception or ‘feeling’ as expressed in the Burra Charter.
Nevertheless, archaeological excavations which reveal highly intact and legible remains in the form of aesthetically attractive artefacts, aged and worn fabric and remnant structures, may allow both professionals and the community to connect with the past through tangible physical evidence.
• Does the site/is the site likely to have aesthetic value?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody distinctive characteristics?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody a distinctive architectural or engineering style or pattern/layout?
• Does the site demonstrate a technology which is the first or last of its kind?
• Does the site demonstrate a range of, or change in, technology?
Ability to demonstrate the past through archaeological remains (NSW Heritage Criteria A, C, F & G).
Archaeological remains have an ability to demonstrate how a site was used, what processes occurred, how work was undertaken and the scale of an industrial practice or other historic occupation. They can demonstrate the principal characteristics of a place or process that may be rare or common.
A site may best demonstrate these aspects at the time of excavation. It may also be possible to explain the nature of the site and demonstrate past practices via public interpretation either before, during, or after excavation.
• Does the site contain well-preserved or rare examples of technologies or occupations which are typical of particular historic periods or eras of particular significance?
• Was it a long-term or short-term use?
• Does the site demonstrate a short period of occupation and therefore represents only a limited phase of the operations of a site or technology or site? Or does the site reflect occupation over a long period?
• Does the site demonstrate continuity or change?
• Are the remains at the site highly intact, legible and readily able to be interpreted?
Archaeological remains may have particular associations with individuals, groups and events which may transform mundane places or objects into significant items through the association with important historical occurrences.
• Does the archaeological site link to any NSW Historic Themes? Will the site contain ‘relics’ and remains which may illustrate a significant pattern in State or local history?
• Is the site widely recognised?
• Does the site have symbolic value?
• Is there a community of interest (past or present) which identifies with, and values the specific site?
• Is the site likely to provide material expression of a particular event or cultural identity?
• Is the site associated with an important person? (the role of the person in State or local history must be demonstrated/known)
• What is the strength of association between the person and the site?
• Did the person live or work at the site? During the phase of their career for which they are most recognised? Is that likely to be evident in the archaeology /physical evidence of the site?
• Did a significant event or discovery take place at the site? Is that evident/or likely to be evident in the archaeology/physical evidence of the site?
Aesthetic or technical significance (NSW Heritage Criterion C).
Whilst the technical value of archaeology is usually considered as ‘research potential’ aesthetic values are not usually considered to be relevant to archaeological sites. This is often because until a site has been excavated, its actual features and attributes may remain unknown. It is also because aesthetic is often interpreted to mean attractive, as opposed to the broader sense of sensory perception or ‘feeling’ as expressed in the Burra Charter.
Nevertheless, archaeological excavations which reveal highly intact and legible remains in the form of aesthetically attractive artefacts, aged and worn fabric and remnant structures, may allow both professionals and the community to connect with the past through tangible physical evidence.
• Does the site/is the site likely to have aesthetic value?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody distinctive characteristics?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody a distinctive architectural or engineering style or pattern/layout?
• Does the site demonstrate a technology which is the first or last of its kind?
• Does the site demonstrate a range of, or change in, technology?
Ability to demonstrate the past through archaeological remains (NSW Heritage Criteria A, C, F & G).
Archaeological remains have an ability to demonstrate how a site was used, what processes occurred, how work was undertaken and the scale of an industrial practice or other historic occupation. They can demonstrate the principal characteristics of a place or process that may be rare or common.
A site may best demonstrate these aspects at the time of excavation. It may also be possible to explain the nature of the site and demonstrate past practices via public interpretation either before, during, or after excavation.
• Does the site contain well-preserved or rare examples of technologies or occupations which are typical of particular historic periods or eras of particular significance?
• Was it a long-term or short-term use?
• Does the site demonstrate a short period of occupation and therefore represents only a limited phase of the operations of a site or technology or site? Or does the site reflect occupation over a long period?
• Does the site demonstrate continuity or change?
• Are the remains at the site highly intact, legible and readily able to be interpreted?
0/5000
Asosiasi dengan individu, peristiwa atau kelompok kepentingan sejarah (NSW warisan kriteria A, B & D).Peninggalan arkeologi mungkin memiliki Asosiasi tertentu dengan individu, kelompok dan peristiwa yang mungkin mengubah tempat biasa atau objek menjadi barang-barang yang signifikan melalui hubungannya dengan kejadian-kejadian bersejarah yang penting.• Apakah link situs arkeologi setiap tema bersejarah NSW? Akan situs berisi 'peninggalan' dan sisa-sisa yang dapat menggambarkan sebuah pola yang signifikan dalam sejarah negara atau lokal?• Apakah situs yang dikenal luas?• Apakah situs memiliki nilai simbolis?• Apakah ada komunitas yang menarik (masa lalu atau sekarang) yang mengidentifikasi dengan, dan nilai-nilai situs tertentu?• Apakah situs cenderung memberikan materi ekspresi dari peristiwa tertentu atau identitas budaya?• Apakah situs yang berkaitan dengan orang penting? (peran orang di negara atau sejarah lokal harus ditunjukkan dikenal)• Apa adalah kekuatan dari Asosiasi antara orang dan situs?• Apakah orang tinggal atau bekerja di situs? Selama fase karir mereka yang mereka paling diakui? Apakah itu cenderung menjadi jelas arkeologi/fisik bukti situs?• Apakah signifikan peristiwa atau penemuan mengambil tempat di situs? Adalah bahwa jelas / atau cenderung menjadi jelas dalam bukti arkeologi fisik situs?Estetika atau teknis signifikansi (NSW warisan kriteria C).Sementara nilai teknis arkeologi biasanya dianggap sebagai 'penelitian potensi' nilai-nilai estetika tidak biasanya dianggap relevan situs arkeologi. Hal ini sering karena sampai situs telah digali, fitur-fiturnya yang sebenarnya dan atribut mungkin tetap tidak diketahui. Hal ini juga karena estetika sering ditafsirkan berarti menarik, bertentangan dengan arti lebih luas sensorik persepsi atau 'merasa' seperti yang dinyatakan dalam Piagam Burra.Namun demikian, penggalian arkeologi yang mengungkapkan tetap sangat utuh dan dapat dibaca dalam bentuk estetis menarik artefak, Umur dan usang kain dan struktur sisa, memungkinkan profesional dan masyarakat untuk berhubungan dengan masa lalu melalui bukti fisik nyata.• Apakah situs/adalah situs mungkin memiliki nilai estetika?• Apakah situs/adalah situs mungkin untuk mewujudkan ciri khas?• Apakah situs/adalah situs mungkin untuk mewujudkan gaya arsitektur atau teknik yang khas atau pola tata-letak?• Apakah situs menunjukkan teknologi yang pertama atau terakhir dari jenisnya?• Apakah situs menunjukkan berbagai, atau perubahan, teknologi?Kemampuan untuk menunjukkan masa lalu melalui peninggalan arkeologi (NSW warisan kriteria A, C, F & G).Arkeologi tetap memiliki kemampuan untuk menunjukkan bagaimana situs yang digunakan, apa proses terjadi, bagaimana pekerjaan ini telah dilakukan dan skala praktik industri atau pendudukan bersejarah lainnya. Mereka dapat menunjukkan ciri-ciri utama dari tempat atau proses yang mungkin jarang atau umum.Situs terbaik mungkin menunjukkan aspek pada saat penggalian. Mungkin juga mungkin untuk menjelaskan sifat situs dan menunjukkan masa lalu praktek melalui interpretasi umum sebelum, selama atau setelah penggalian.• Apakah situs berisi terawat baik atau jarang contoh teknologi atau pekerjaan yang khas dari periode bersejarah tertentu atau era tertentu penting?• Apakah penggunaan jangka panjang atau jangka pendek?• Apakah situs menunjukkan singkat pekerjaan dan karena itu mewakili hanya terbatas pada tahap operasi situs atau situs atau teknologi? Atau tidak situs mencerminkan pekerjaan jangka panjang?• Apakah situs menunjukkan kesinambungan atau mengubah?• Apakah tetap di situs sangat utuh, dibaca, dan mudah dapat ditafsirkan?
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Associations with individuals, events or groups of historical importance (NSW Heritage Criteria A, B & D).
Archaeological remains may have particular associations with individuals, groups and events which may transform mundane places or objects into significant items through the association with important historical occurrences.
• Does the archaeological site link to any NSW Historic Themes? Will the site contain ‘relics’ and remains which may illustrate a significant pattern in State or local history?
• Is the site widely recognised?
• Does the site have symbolic value?
• Is there a community of interest (past or present) which identifies with, and values the specific site?
• Is the site likely to provide material expression of a particular event or cultural identity?
• Is the site associated with an important person? (the role of the person in State or local history must be demonstrated/known)
• What is the strength of association between the person and the site?
• Did the person live or work at the site? During the phase of their career for which they are most recognised? Is that likely to be evident in the archaeology /physical evidence of the site?
• Did a significant event or discovery take place at the site? Is that evident/or likely to be evident in the archaeology/physical evidence of the site?
Aesthetic or technical significance (NSW Heritage Criterion C).
Whilst the technical value of archaeology is usually considered as ‘research potential’ aesthetic values are not usually considered to be relevant to archaeological sites. This is often because until a site has been excavated, its actual features and attributes may remain unknown. It is also because aesthetic is often interpreted to mean attractive, as opposed to the broader sense of sensory perception or ‘feeling’ as expressed in the Burra Charter.
Nevertheless, archaeological excavations which reveal highly intact and legible remains in the form of aesthetically attractive artefacts, aged and worn fabric and remnant structures, may allow both professionals and the community to connect with the past through tangible physical evidence.
• Does the site/is the site likely to have aesthetic value?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody distinctive characteristics?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody a distinctive architectural or engineering style or pattern/layout?
• Does the site demonstrate a technology which is the first or last of its kind?
• Does the site demonstrate a range of, or change in, technology?
Ability to demonstrate the past through archaeological remains (NSW Heritage Criteria A, C, F & G).
Archaeological remains have an ability to demonstrate how a site was used, what processes occurred, how work was undertaken and the scale of an industrial practice or other historic occupation. They can demonstrate the principal characteristics of a place or process that may be rare or common.
A site may best demonstrate these aspects at the time of excavation. It may also be possible to explain the nature of the site and demonstrate past practices via public interpretation either before, during, or after excavation.
• Does the site contain well-preserved or rare examples of technologies or occupations which are typical of particular historic periods or eras of particular significance?
• Was it a long-term or short-term use?
• Does the site demonstrate a short period of occupation and therefore represents only a limited phase of the operations of a site or technology or site? Or does the site reflect occupation over a long period?
• Does the site demonstrate continuity or change?
• Are the remains at the site highly intact, legible and readily able to be interpreted?
Archaeological remains may have particular associations with individuals, groups and events which may transform mundane places or objects into significant items through the association with important historical occurrences.
• Does the archaeological site link to any NSW Historic Themes? Will the site contain ‘relics’ and remains which may illustrate a significant pattern in State or local history?
• Is the site widely recognised?
• Does the site have symbolic value?
• Is there a community of interest (past or present) which identifies with, and values the specific site?
• Is the site likely to provide material expression of a particular event or cultural identity?
• Is the site associated with an important person? (the role of the person in State or local history must be demonstrated/known)
• What is the strength of association between the person and the site?
• Did the person live or work at the site? During the phase of their career for which they are most recognised? Is that likely to be evident in the archaeology /physical evidence of the site?
• Did a significant event or discovery take place at the site? Is that evident/or likely to be evident in the archaeology/physical evidence of the site?
Aesthetic or technical significance (NSW Heritage Criterion C).
Whilst the technical value of archaeology is usually considered as ‘research potential’ aesthetic values are not usually considered to be relevant to archaeological sites. This is often because until a site has been excavated, its actual features and attributes may remain unknown. It is also because aesthetic is often interpreted to mean attractive, as opposed to the broader sense of sensory perception or ‘feeling’ as expressed in the Burra Charter.
Nevertheless, archaeological excavations which reveal highly intact and legible remains in the form of aesthetically attractive artefacts, aged and worn fabric and remnant structures, may allow both professionals and the community to connect with the past through tangible physical evidence.
• Does the site/is the site likely to have aesthetic value?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody distinctive characteristics?
• Does the site/is the site likely to embody a distinctive architectural or engineering style or pattern/layout?
• Does the site demonstrate a technology which is the first or last of its kind?
• Does the site demonstrate a range of, or change in, technology?
Ability to demonstrate the past through archaeological remains (NSW Heritage Criteria A, C, F & G).
Archaeological remains have an ability to demonstrate how a site was used, what processes occurred, how work was undertaken and the scale of an industrial practice or other historic occupation. They can demonstrate the principal characteristics of a place or process that may be rare or common.
A site may best demonstrate these aspects at the time of excavation. It may also be possible to explain the nature of the site and demonstrate past practices via public interpretation either before, during, or after excavation.
• Does the site contain well-preserved or rare examples of technologies or occupations which are typical of particular historic periods or eras of particular significance?
• Was it a long-term or short-term use?
• Does the site demonstrate a short period of occupation and therefore represents only a limited phase of the operations of a site or technology or site? Or does the site reflect occupation over a long period?
• Does the site demonstrate continuity or change?
• Are the remains at the site highly intact, legible and readily able to be interpreted?
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.
- Saya pikir anda mencintai saya ternyata
- tim singa
- Benda tersebut Bersifat kasar
- The three musketters
- Benda tersebut Bersifat kasar
- Begitu
- Terkadang orang kalau udah dikasih enak
- singa
- ยัง
- tolong lah mengerti kamu nya.. jangan bi
- Benda ini selalu dibawa oleh siswa di se
- Gila
- You have been able to my heart beating
- Bersifat kasar
- You have been able to beating my heart
- Bersifat kasar
- Terkadang orang kalau udah dikasih enak
- (Casey & Lowe Pty Ltd, ‘Excavation Permi
- profılı begenırmısın
- Ar you angry
- 3.3 Levels Of SignificanceTwo levels of
- Aku kecewa melihatnya
- Terkadang orang kalau udah dikasih enak
- State Significant Site – Veteran Hall, P
