Published data on the influence of geometric meandiameter (GMD) of the terjemahan - Published data on the influence of geometric meandiameter (GMD) of the Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

Published data on the influence of

Published data on the influence of geometric mean
diameter (GMD) of the diet on laying hen performance
and egg quality is limited and controversial.
Amerah et al. (2007) hypothesized that fine grinding
increased the surface area available for the activity of
endogenous enzymes and thus improves nutrient digestibility
and productive performance. Consequently,
fine grinding should be preferred to coarse grinding in
poultry feeds. However, Svihus et al. (2002) indicated
that when coarse particles are fed to birds, the feed will remain in the gizzard until particle size has been
reduced sufficiently. Hetland et al. (2002) reported that
digesta particles entering the duodenum are remarkably
small (46 to 70% of the particles being smaller
than 100 µm) and relatively homogeneous, as compared
with the particle size of the diet. Maclsaac and Anderson
(2007) noted that ADFI and hen productivity
were not affected when SCWL were fed diets based on
a mixture of corn and wheat ground through a 5- or
7-mm screen from 20 to 64 wk of age. Also, Deaton et
al. (1989) found in 3 consecutive trials that grinding
the corn to formulate diets with GMD varying from
814 to 873 µm did not affect laying hen performance.
In contrast, Green (1991) reported that ADFI of brown
hens fed mash diets from 50 to 70 wk of age was greater
with coarsely than with finely ground diets. However,
they reported that hen productivity was not affected by
GMD of the diet. The reasons for the discrepancies in
the literature are not known but grinding changes feed
texture and modify feed intake and the development of
the gastrointestinal tract (Nir et al., 1994).
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
Published data on the influence of geometric meandiameter (GMD) of the diet on laying hen performanceand egg quality is limited and controversial.Amerah et al. (2007) hypothesized that fine grindingincreased the surface area available for the activity ofendogenous enzymes and thus improves nutrient digestibilityand productive performance. Consequently,fine grinding should be preferred to coarse grinding inpoultry feeds. However, Svihus et al. (2002) indicatedthat when coarse particles are fed to birds, the feed will remain in the gizzard until particle size has beenreduced sufficiently. Hetland et al. (2002) reported thatdigesta particles entering the duodenum are remarkablysmall (46 to 70% of the particles being smallerthan 100 µm) and relatively homogeneous, as comparedwith the particle size of the diet. Maclsaac and Anderson(2007) noted that ADFI and hen productivitywere not affected when SCWL were fed diets based ona mixture of corn and wheat ground through a 5- or7-mm screen from 20 to 64 wk of age. Also, Deaton etal. (1989) found in 3 consecutive trials that grindingthe corn to formulate diets with GMD varying from814 to 873 µm did not affect laying hen performance.In contrast, Green (1991) reported that ADFI of brownhens fed mash diets from 50 to 70 wk of age was greaterwith coarsely than with finely ground diets. However,they reported that hen productivity was not affected byGMD of the diet. The reasons for the discrepancies inthe literature are not known but grinding changes feedtexture and modify feed intake and the development ofthe gastrointestinal tract (Nir et al., 1994).
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
Data yang diterbitkan pada pengaruh mean geometrik
diameter (GMD) dari diet pada peletakan kinerja ayam
dan telur kualitas terbatas dan kontroversial.
Amerah dkk. (2007) hipotesis bahwa fine grinding
meningkatkan luas permukaan yang tersedia untuk kegiatan
enzim endogen dan dengan demikian meningkatkan kecernaan nutrisi
dan kinerja produktif. Akibatnya,
fine grinding harus disukai sampai kasar grinding di
feed unggas. Namun, Svihus dkk. (2002) menunjukkan
bahwa ketika partikel kasar diberi makan burung, pakan akan tetap di rempela sampai ukuran partikel telah
berkurang cukup. Hetland dkk. (2002) melaporkan bahwa
digesta partikel memasuki duodenum yang sangat
kecil (46-70% dari partikel yang lebih kecil
dari 100 mm) dan relatif homogen, dibandingkan
dengan ukuran partikel dari diet. Maclsaac dan Anderson
(2007) mencatat bahwa ADFI dan produktivitas ayam
tidak terpengaruh ketika SCWL diberi makan diet berdasarkan
campuran jagung dan gandum tanah melalui 5- atau
layar 7-mm 20-64 minggu usia. Juga, Deaton et
al. (1989) ditemukan dalam 3 percobaan berturut-turut yang menggiling
jagung untuk merumuskan diet dengan GMD bervariasi dari
814 ke 873 m tidak mempengaruhi peletakan kinerja ayam.
Sebaliknya, Hijau (1991) melaporkan bahwa ADFI coklat
ayam diberi makan diet tumbuk 50-70 minggu usia lebih besar
dengan kasar daripada dengan diet ditumbuk halus. Namun,
mereka melaporkan bahwa produktivitas ayam tidak terpengaruh oleh
GMD dari diet. Alasan untuk perbedaan dalam
literatur tidak diketahui tetapi perubahan grinding makan
tekstur dan memodifikasi asupan pakan dan pengembangan
saluran pencernaan (Nir et al., 1994).
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: