Standardization vs. AdaptationThe f

Standardization vs. Adaptation

The first view is the standardization standpoint (as proposed by Jain, 1989; Levitt, 1983). According to these authors, supporters of standardization believe that there is a union of cultures with similar environmental and customer demand around the globe. They argue that trade barriers are getting lower and that technological advances and firms are displaying a global orientation in their strategy. As they believe, creating one strategy for the global market and standardizing the marketing mix elements can achieve consistency with customers as well as lower costs. Levitt (1983) argues that companies that are managed well have moved away from customizing items to offering globally standardized products that are advanced, functional, reliable and low priced. According to him, companies can achieve long-term success by concentrating on what everyone wants rather than worrying about the particulars of what everyone thinks they might like.

On the contrary, supporters of the international adaptation approach, emphasize the importance of customization. The fundamental basis of the adaptation school of thought, is that when entering a foreign market one must consider all environmental factors and constraints such as language, climate, race, occupations, education, taste, different laws, cultures, and societies (Czinkota and Ronkainen, 1998). However, researchers have identified important source of constraints that are difficult to measure such as cultural differences rooted in history, education, religion, values and attitudes, manners and customs, aesthetics as well as differences in taste, needs and wants, economics and legal systems. According to Vrontis and Thrassou supporters of this approach believe that “multinational companies should have to find out how they must adjust an entire marketing strategy and, including how they sell, distribute it, in order to fit new market demands” (2007). It is important to alter the marketing mixed and marketing strategy to suit local tastes, meet special market needs and consumers non-identical requirements (Vrontis and Thrassou,2007).