law still offers very few rules on

law still offers very few rules on peaceful change, some convincing examples occurred
in state practice during the dramatic changes in Europe in the 1990s.
Since the Westphalian Peace Treaty of 1648 the concept of international security has
disregarded the internal affairs of a state because the intervention by other states has
been a major threat to international peace. With the close of the twentieth century,
international law faces a new development shifting the focus of security from primarily
defending territory to
protecting people (see Section 4.4.6. Humanitarian
Intervention). This leads to a legal dilemma of non-intervention, because on the one
hand national sovereignty is the cornerstone of international security, but on the other
hand it may be used as a shield wantonly to violate the rights and lives of human beings.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

hukum masih menawarkan sedikit peraturan tentang perubahan damai, beberapa contoh meyakinkan terjadidalam praktek negara selama perubahan dramatis di Eropa pada 1990-an.Sejak perjanjian perdamaian Westphalia 1648 konsep keamanan internasional telahdiabaikan urusan internal negara karena intervensi oleh negara-negara lain memilikimenjadi ancaman utama bagi perdamaian internasional. Dengan akhir abad 20,hukum internasional menghadapi perkembangan baru menggeser fokus keamanan dari terutamamempertahankan wilayahmelindungi orang-orang (Lihat bagian 4.4.6. KemanusiaanIntervensi). Ini mengarah ke sebuah dilema hukum non-intervensi, karena di satukedaulatan nasional tangan adalah landasan dari keamanan internasional, tetapi di sisi laintangan ini dapat digunakan sebagai perisai ceroboh melanggar hak-hak dan kehidupan manusia.