By early June, six class action law

By early June, six class action lawsuits claiming that Google had violated federal wiretapping laws had
been filed in the United States.96 In its defense, Google argued that collecting unencrypted payload data is not a
violation of federal laws.97 Google explained that in order to locate wireless hotspots, it used a passive scanning
technique, which had picked up payload data by mistake. The company used open source Kismet wireless
scanning software that was customized by a Google engineer in 2006.98 Google insisted that the project’s
managers were unaware that the software had been programmed to collect payload data when they launched the
project. Finally, Google argued that the data it collected was fragmented—not only was the car moving, but it was
changing channels five times per second.99

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Oleh awal Juni, enam gugatan class action yang mengklaim bahwa Google telah melanggar undang-undang federal penyadapan telahtelah diajukan di Amerika States.96 dalam pertahanan, Google berpendapat bahwa mengumpulkan data tidak terenkripsi muatan bukanlahpelanggaran federal laws.97 Google menjelaskan bahwa menemukan hotspot nirkabel, hal itu digunakan pemindaian pasifteknik, yang telah mengambil data muatan oleh kesalahan. Perusahaan menggunakan sumber terbuka Kismet nirkabelpemindaian perangkat lunak yang disesuaikan oleh insinyur Google dalam 2006.98 Google bersikeras bahwa proyekManajer tidak menyadari bahwa perangkat lunak telah diprogram untuk mengumpulkan data muatan ketika mereka diluncurkanproyek. Akhirnya, Google berpendapat bahwa data ini dikumpulkan juga — tidak hanya mobil yang bergerak, tapi itumengganti saluran lima kali per second.99