According to Donald (1991), these systems alternate control with each  terjemahan - According to Donald (1991), these systems alternate control with each  Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

According to Donald (1991), these s

According to Donald (1991), these systems alternate control with each other
depending on the circumstances, driving information behavior. Cognitive aspects of human
socio-cognitive ability are briefly referred to at the top of Figure 1. Donald (1991)
hypothesizes that while primates, as well as humans, have episodic memory (i.e., memory
for discrete events); the semantic drive to integrate the events of human existence into some
sort of coherent narrative is a feature of cognition.

Integrative Mind
Myth: Social
Theoretic: Symbolic
system: Cognitive
Data (informal,
unsystematic,
Inputs
Knowledge (positive
Outputs
Mimetic System:
social cohesion
Episodic System
Whole: semantic brain
Information Behavior
Cooperatio
Anomalies (negative
Discrete: episodic
Information behavior: a socio-cognitive ability
Evolutionary Psychology – ISSN 1474-7049 – Volume 5(2). 2007. -270-
In the Figure 1 model, we rely on two major components:
1. that the evolution of the human brain is driven by human modeling of the
environment by integrating discrete events and things together into an increasingly
complex narrative; and
2. that all phases of brain development are still present influencing information
behavior, the focus of the model, and should thus be accounted for in our model
(Donald, 1991; Smith, 2006).
This evolutionary perspective on information behavior and what constitutes
information is a significant new view for information science. All phases of human
evolution are present and operating in the human mind we have now, indicating that the
episodic, mimetic, myth and theoretic minds all contribute tools to the human arsenal to
achieve the evolutionary outputs of cooperation and competition.
In the hybrid scheme proposed here, the functional locus of “consciousness” can
shift, depending upon the representational system currently in command” (Donald,
1991, p. 369).
An important conclusion is that all four types of minds motivate information
behaviors.
Conclusion and further research
In this paper we have incorporated models and theories that highlight information
behavior as primarily a social construct, driven by a survival mechanism that found its
competition for survival in other human social groups rather than the environment itself as
was the case with all other species. The evolution of social cultures created different human
methods of representing and modeling human thought, and the transition from one socially
derived method of mental modeling, from episodic to mimetic to myth to theoretic, drove
brain development. Social cultures exist in the present human brain and thus influence
information behavior.
In this paper we sketched the way intra-group cooperation to survive against inter
group competition drives evolution. There is a communication aspect to creating
cooperation. It drives the human to put a coherent narrative of human existence into
symbolic form so that it can be communicated to others in the group. Information behavior
in terms of both inputs and outputs as described in Figure 1 takes on various forms to
further this communication drive. Information behavior is a socio-cognitive ability which
humans have various aptitudes for; but on the level of Homo sapiens it is a species sociocognitive
ability that has ensured human cooperation, competition and survival, and lead to
the increased pace of our evolution in an environment where there are no rival species.
Further theoretical and empirical research is needed to more fully explore these
issues and examine the nature of information behavior as a socio-cognitive ability to fully
grasp the relationship between information behavior and evolution. The evolutionary
approach to understanding information behavior represents a significant intellectual shift
that promotes connections between the human past and present, and at all way stations
along the human evolutionary path. This approach reshapes the frame and refines the lens
through which humans are able to look holistically at their past, present, and future
information behavior’s in a temporally-expanded information-relevant context.
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
According to Donald (1991), these systems alternate control with each otherdepending on the circumstances, driving information behavior. Cognitive aspects of humansocio-cognitive ability are briefly referred to at the top of Figure 1. Donald (1991)hypothesizes that while primates, as well as humans, have episodic memory (i.e., memoryfor discrete events); the semantic drive to integrate the events of human existence into somesort of coherent narrative is a feature of cognition.Integrative MindMyth: SocialTheoretic: Symbolicsystem: CognitiveData (informal,unsystematic,InputsKnowledge (positiveOutputsMimetic System:social cohesionEpisodic SystemWhole: semantic brainInformation BehaviorCooperatioAnomalies (negativeDiscrete: episodic Information behavior: a socio-cognitive abilityEvolutionary Psychology – ISSN 1474-7049 – Volume 5(2). 2007. -270- In the Figure 1 model, we rely on two major components:1. that the evolution of the human brain is driven by human modeling of theenvironment by integrating discrete events and things together into an increasinglycomplex narrative; and2. that all phases of brain development are still present influencing informationbehavior, the focus of the model, and should thus be accounted for in our model(Donald, 1991; Smith, 2006). This evolutionary perspective on information behavior and what constitutesinformation is a significant new view for information science. All phases of humanevolution are present and operating in the human mind we have now, indicating that theepisodic, mimetic, myth and theoretic minds all contribute tools to the human arsenal toachieve the evolutionary outputs of cooperation and competition.In the hybrid scheme proposed here, the functional locus of “consciousness” canshift, depending upon the representational system currently in command” (Donald,1991, p. 369). An important conclusion is that all four types of minds motivate informationbehaviors.Conclusion and further research In this paper we have incorporated models and theories that highlight informationbehavior as primarily a social construct, driven by a survival mechanism that found itscompetition for survival in other human social groups rather than the environment itself aswas the case with all other species. The evolution of social cultures created different humanmethods of representing and modeling human thought, and the transition from one sociallyderived method of mental modeling, from episodic to mimetic to myth to theoretic, drovebrain development. Social cultures exist in the present human brain and thus influenceinformation behavior. In this paper we sketched the way intra-group cooperation to survive against intergroup competition drives evolution. There is a communication aspect to creatingcooperation. It drives the human to put a coherent narrative of human existence intosymbolic form so that it can be communicated to others in the group. Information behaviorin terms of both inputs and outputs as described in Figure 1 takes on various forms tofurther this communication drive. Information behavior is a socio-cognitive ability whichhumans have various aptitudes for; but on the level of Homo sapiens it is a species sociocognitiveability that has ensured human cooperation, competition and survival, and lead tothe increased pace of our evolution in an environment where there are no rival species. Further theoretical and empirical research is needed to more fully explore theseissues and examine the nature of information behavior as a socio-cognitive ability to fullygrasp the relationship between information behavior and evolution. The evolutionaryapproach to understanding information behavior represents a significant intellectual shiftthat promotes connections between the human past and present, and at all way stationsalong the human evolutionary path. This approach reshapes the frame and refines the lensthrough which humans are able to look holistically at their past, present, and futureinformation behavior’s in a temporally-expanded information-relevant context.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
Menurut Donald (1991), sistem ini kontrol alternatif dengan satu sama lain
tergantung pada keadaan, mengemudi perilaku informasi. Aspek kognitif manusia
kemampuan sosial kognitif secara singkat disebut di atas Gambar 1. Donald (1991)
berhipotesis bahwa sementara primata, serta manusia, memiliki memori episodik (yaitu, memori
untuk acara diskrit); drive semantik untuk mengintegrasikan peristiwa eksistensi manusia ke dalam beberapa
jenis narasi yang koheren adalah fitur kognisi. Integratif Pikiran Mitos: Social teoritik: Simbolik sistem: Kognitif Data (informal sistematis, Input Pengetahuan (positif Output mimesis Sistem: kohesi sosial Episodic Sistem Whole: semantik otak Informasi Perilaku cooperatio Anomali (negatif Discrete: episodik perilaku Informasi: kemampuan sosial kognitif . Psikologi Evolusioner - ISSN 1474-7049 - Volume 5 (2) 2007. -270- Dalam Gambar 1 Model, kita bergantung pada dua komponen utama: 1. bahwa evolusi otak manusia didorong oleh model manusia dari lingkungan dengan mengintegrasikan peristiwa diskrit dan hal bersama-sama menjadi semakin narasi yang kompleks, dan 2. bahwa semua tahap perkembangan otak masih ada yang mempengaruhi informasi perilaku, fokus model, dan dengan demikian harus diperhitungkan dalam model kita (Donald, 1991; Smith, 2006). Perspektif ini evolusi pada perilaku informasi dan apa yang merupakan informasi adalah pandangan baru yang signifikan untuk ilmu informasi. Semua fase manusia evolusi yang hadir dan beroperasi di pikiran manusia yang kita miliki sekarang, menunjukkan bahwa episodik, mimesis, mitos dan pikiran teori semua berkontribusi alat untuk gudang manusia untuk mencapai output evolusi kerjasama dan kompetisi. Dalam skema hybrid yang diusulkan di sini, lokus fungsional "kesadaran" bisa bergeser, tergantung pada sistem representasi saat perintah "(Donald, 1991, hal. 369). Sebuah kesimpulan penting adalah bahwa semua empat jenis pikiran memotivasi informasi perilaku. Kesimpulan dan penelitian lebih lanjut Dalam makalah ini kami telah memasukkan model dan teori-teori yang menyoroti informasi perilaku sebagai terutama konstruksi sosial, didorong oleh mekanisme bertahan hidup yang ditemukan pada persaingan untuk bertahan hidup dalam kelompok sosial manusia lain daripada lingkungan sendiri seperti yang terjadi dengan semua spesies lain. Evolusi budaya sosial yang dibuat berbeda manusia metode mewakili dan pemodelan pemikiran manusia, dan transisi dari satu sosial metode berasal dari pemodelan mental, dari episodik ke mimesis dengan mitos untuk teoritis, melaju perkembangan otak. Budaya sosial yang ada di otak manusia saat ini dan dengan demikian mempengaruhi perilaku informasi. Dalam makalah ini kami membuat sketsa cara kerjasama intra-kelompok untuk bertahan melawan antar kelompok kompetisi drive evolusi. Ada aspek komunikasi untuk menciptakan kerjasama. Ini mendorong manusia untuk menempatkan narasi yang koheren dari eksistensi manusia dalam bentuk simbolik sehingga dapat dikomunikasikan kepada orang lain dalam kelompok. Perilaku informasi baik dari segi input dan output seperti yang dijelaskan pada Gambar 1 mengambil berbagai bentuk untuk melanjutkan perjalanan komunikasi ini. Perilaku informasi adalah kemampuan sosial kognitif yang manusia memiliki berbagai bakat untuk; tetapi pada tingkat Homo sapiens itu adalah sociocognitive spesies kemampuan yang telah memastikan kerjasama manusia, kompetisi dan kelangsungan hidup, dan mengarah pada peningkatan laju evolusi kita dalam lingkungan di mana tidak ada spesies saingan. penelitian teoritis dan empiris lebih lanjut diperlukan untuk lebih mengeksplorasi ini masalah dan memeriksa sifat perilaku informasi sebagai kemampuan sosial kognitif untuk sepenuhnya memahami hubungan antara perilaku informasi dan evolusi. The evolusi pendekatan untuk memahami perilaku informasi merupakan pergeseran intelektual yang signifikan yang mempromosikan hubungan antara masa lalu dan kini manusia, dan di semua stasiun jalan sepanjang jalur evolusi manusia. Pendekatan ini membentuk ulang frame dan memurnikan lensa melalui mana manusia mampu melihat secara holistik di masa lalu, sekarang, dan masa depan perilaku informasi dalam konteks informasi yang relevan temporal-diperluas.






























































Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: