The purpose of this investigation w

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if there was a difference in the development of effective urban teacher characteristics between student interns placed in either an urban Professional Development School environment or an urban non Professional Development School environment. Student interns in urban universities with partnerships in neighboring urban school districts participated in this investigation. The Urban Teacher Selection Interview was used to assess 10 characteristics, including (1) Persistence, (2) Values Children’s Learning, (3) Putting Ideas into Practice, (4) Approach to At-Risk Students, (5) Professional/Personal Orientation to Students, (6) The Bureaucracy, (7) Fallibility, (8) Teacher Success, (9) Student Success, and (10) Planning and Organization.
Assessments were completed before and after subjects participated in internship experiences. Using a causal comparative research design, pre- and post-test scores were compared using Descriptive Statistics and an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) statistical procedure. The results communicated that although there were individual growth and declines for the student interns on each of the characteristics, there was not a significant difference between the two groups. The results suggest that a link between the Professional Development School reform effort and the development of effective urban teacher characteristics could not be established.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan dalam pengembangan karakteristik guru perkotaan yang efektif antara mahasiswa magang ditempatkan baik lingkungan Pengembangan Sekolah Profesional perkotaan atau lingkungan non Pengembangan Sekolah Profesional perkotaan. Magang mahasiswa di universitas-universitas perkotaan dengan kemitraan di sekolah kabupaten kota tetangga berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Urban Guru Seleksi Wawancara digunakan untuk menilai 10 karakteristik, termasuk (1) Kegigihan, (2) Nilai Belajar Anak, (3) Menempatkan Situs ke Praktik, (4) Pendekatan At-Risk Mahasiswa, (5) Profesional / Personal Orientasi untuk Mahasiswa, (6) Birokrasi, (7) Falibilitas, (8) Guru Sukses, (9) Sukses Mahasiswa, dan (10) Perencanaan dan Organisasi.
Penilaian diselesaikan sebelum dan sesudah pelajaran berpartisipasi dalam pengalaman magang. Menggunakan desain penelitian komparatif kausal, skor pra dan pasca tes dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Statistik Deskriptif dan Analisis Kovarian (ANCOVA) prosedur statistik. Hasil dikomunikasikan bahwa meskipun ada pertumbuhan individu dan menurun untuk magang siswa pada masing-masing karakteristik, tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara kedua kelompok. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hubungan antara upaya reformasi Pengembangan Sekolah Profesional dan pengembangan karakteristik guru perkotaan yang efektif tidak dapat ditentukan.