Determination was performed either

Determination was performed either to the spe-cies (A. galli,H. gallinarum), genus (Capillar-ia), or class (in the case of cestodes) [15, 16].
Analysis of Parasitological Data
For worm counts, generalized linear models
assuming clumped data and negative binomial
distribution [17, 18] were applied using the sta-tistical software Stata /IC10.0 [19]. Fecal egg
counts were analyzed according to Torgerson et
al. [20].
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Vegetation
Descriptive results of vegetation scoring are
presented in Figure 2 using pooled data per ob-servation point (data of 2 vegetation periods on
farm X; data of 1 vegetation period and 2 repli-cates on farm Y). Rotational use of runs led to
a reduction of the bare area close to the house
(Figure 2); over 90% of the soil was bare in
the first quarter and almost 40% in the middle
of the permanently used paddock. This propor-tion was reduced to ≤22% in the area close to
the house of runs used alternately, the bare soil
being mainly replaced by grass cover. Where
vegetation was present, its average height was
between 9 and 12 cm in all the quarters except
for paddock A at 36 m from the henhouse, where
vegetation height was 4 cm (data not shown).
The results from farm Y were similar (Figure 2),
with the exception that 10 to 20% of the soil was
bare in the distant quarters of the paddocks as
well. Vegetation height was between 8 and 15
cm in the quarters with >20% vegetation cover,
whereas it was only 5 cm in paddocks A and B at
36 m from the henhouse (data not shown).
Soil Analysis
Soil type on farm X was defined as medium
to heavy brown soil (pH 7, 1–3% soil carbon).
Descriptive results of the soil analysis are pre-sented in Table 1.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Penentuan dilakukan baik dengan spe-species (A. galli, H. Gallinarum), genus (Capillar-besarbesaran), atau kelas (dalam kasus cestoda) [15, 16].
Analisis Parasitological data
Untuk jumlah cacing, umum model linier
dengan asumsi data yang mengelompok dan binomial negatif
distribusi [17, 18] yang diterapkan menggunakan sta-tistical software Stata /IC10.0 [19]. Telur tinja
jumlah dianalisis menurut Torgerson et
al. . [20]
HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN
Vegetasi
hasil deskriptif scoring vegetasi yang
disajikan pada Gambar 2 menggunakan data panel per titik ob-konservasi (data 2 periode vegetasi di
peternakan X; data periode 1 vegetasi dan 2 repli-Cates di pertanian Y) . Penggunaan rotasi berjalan menyebabkan
pengurangan area telanjang dekat dengan rumah
(Gambar 2); lebih dari 90% dari tanah telanjang di
kuartal pertama dan hampir 40% di tengah
dari paddock digunakan secara permanen. Ini propor-tion dikurangi menjadi ≤22% di daerah dekat dengan
rumah berjalan digunakan secara bergantian, tanah kosong
yang terutama digantikan oleh penutup rumput. Di mana
vegetasi hadir, tinggi rata-rata adalah
antara 9 dan 12 cm di semua tempat kecuali
untuk paddock A pada 36 m dari kandang ayam, di mana
ketinggian vegetasi adalah 4 cm (data tidak ditampilkan).
Hasil dari peternakan Y adalah serupa (Gambar 2),
dengan pengecualian bahwa 10 sampai 20% dari tanah adalah
telanjang di perempat jauh dari padang sebagai
baik. Ketinggian vegetasi adalah antara 8 dan 15
cm di perempat dengan> 20% tutupan vegetasi,
sedangkan itu hanya 5 cm di padang A dan B di
36 m dari kandang ayam (data tidak ditampilkan).
Analisis Tanah
Jenis tanah di peternakan X didefinisikan sebagai media
untuk tanah berat coklat (pH 7, 1-3% karbon tanah).
Hasil deskriptif analisis tanah pra-sented pada Tabel 1.