Crawford and Hollis reported that d

Crawford and Hollis reported that direct comparisons of allylamines and azoles showed allylamines to be more efficacious
than azoles. This difference among classes was detected in out-
comes assessed 6 weeks after treatment began and appeared to
remain over longer periods. 8 A result favouring the use of allylamines was also obtained by Hart et al., although some language
bias was detected. Thus eight studies reported in English
favoured allylamines, while four foreign language reports
showed no difference among azoles and allylamines.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Crawford dan Hollis melaporkan bahwa perbandingan langsung allylamines dan azoles menunjukkan allylamines menjadi lebih mujarabdaripada azoles. Perbedaan antara kelas terdeteksi di out-datang dinilai 6 minggu setelah perawatan mulai dan tampaknyatetap selama waktu yang lama. 8 hasil mendukung penggunaan allylamines juga diperoleh oleh Hart et al., meskipun beberapa bahasabias terdeteksi. Dengan demikian studi delapan melaporkan dalam bahasa Inggrisallylamines disukai, sementara empat laporan bahasa asingmenunjukkan tidak ada perbedaan antara azoles dan allylamines.