Whereas the WCC theory predicts tha

Whereas the WCC theory predicts that people with autism or Asperger syndrome will be forever lost in the detail and never achieve an understanding of the system as a whole (since this would require a global overview), the E - S theory predicts that over time the person may achieve an excellent understanding of a whole system, given the opportunity to observe and control all the variables in that system. The existence of talented mathematicians with Asperger syndrome like Richard Borcherds is proof that such individuals can integrate the details into a true understanding of the system (Baron - Cohen, 2003 ). It is worth noting that the Executive Dysfunction (ED) theory (Ozonoff, Pennington, & Rogers, 1991 ; Rumsey & Hamberger, 1988 ; Russell, 1997 ) has even more diffi culty in explaining instances of good understanding of a whole system, such as calendrical calculation, or indeed why the “ obsessions ” in autism and Asperger syndrome should center on systems at all.
So, when the low - functioning person with classic autism has shaken a piece of string thousands of times close to his eyes, whilst the ED theory sees this as perseveration arising from some neural dysfunction which would normally enable the individual to shift attention, the E - S theory sees the same behavior as a sign that the individual understands the physics of that string movement. He may be able to make it move in exactly the same way every time. When he makes a long, rapid sequence of sounds, he may know exactly that acoustic pattern, and get some pleasure from the confirmation that the sequence is the same every time. Much as a mathematician might feel an ultimate sense of pleasure that the “ golden ratio ” (that a + b/a = a/b) always comes out as 1.61803399, so the child – even with low - functioning autism – who produces the same outcome every time with his repetitive behavior appears to derive some emotional pleasure at the predictability of the world. This may be what is clinically described as “ stimming ” (Wing, 1997 ). Autism was originally described as involving “ resistance to change ” and “ need for sameness ” (Kanner, 1943 ), and here we see that this important clinical observation may be the hallmark of strong systemizing.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Sedangkan WCC Teori memprediksi bahwa orang-orang dengan autism atau Asperger syndrome akan selamanya hilang secara detail dan tidak pernah mencapai pemahaman tentang sistem secara keseluruhan (karena ini akan memerlukan gambaran global), E - S Teori memprediksi bahwa dari waktu ke waktu orang dapat mencapai pemahaman yang sangat baik dari seluruh sistem, diberi kesempatan untuk mengamati dan mengontrol semua variabel dalam sistem itu. Keberadaan berbakat matematikawan dengan Sindrom Asperger seperti Richard Borcherds bukti bahwa individu-individu tersebut dapat mengintegrasikan rincian ke pemahaman yang benar dari sistem (Baron - Cohen, 2003). It's worth dicatat bahwa teori eksekutif disfungsi (ED) (Ozonoff, Pennington, & Rogers, 1991; Rumsey & Hamberger, 1988; Russell, 1997) memiliki lebih diffi culty dalam menjelaskan contoh dari pemahaman yang baik dari seluruh sistem, seperti perhitungan kalendar, atau memang mengapa "obsesi" di autism dan Asperger syndrome harus pusat pada sistem sama sekali. So, when the low - functioning person with classic autism has shaken a piece of string thousands of times close to his eyes, whilst the ED theory sees this as perseveration arising from some neural dysfunction which would normally enable the individual to shift attention, the E - S theory sees the same behavior as a sign that the individual understands the physics of that string movement. He may be able to make it move in exactly the same way every time. When he makes a long, rapid sequence of sounds, he may know exactly that acoustic pattern, and get some pleasure from the confirmation that the sequence is the same every time. Much as a mathematician might feel an ultimate sense of pleasure that the “ golden ratio ” (that a + b/a = a/b) always comes out as 1.61803399, so the child – even with low - functioning autism – who produces the same outcome every time with his repetitive behavior appears to derive some emotional pleasure at the predictability of the world. This may be what is clinically described as “ stimming ” (Wing, 1997 ). Autism was originally described as involving “ resistance to change ” and “ need for sameness ” (Kanner, 1943 ), and here we see that this important clinical observation may be the hallmark of strong systemizing.