The decision difficulty factor (Nen

The decision difficulty factor (Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-D) correlated positively with indecisiveness, avoidance, regret, neuroticism, and depression. This factor also significantly correlated negatively with life satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and need for cognition. The high standards factor (Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-H) significantly correlated positively with regret, life satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and need for cognition. The high standards factor was significantly negatively correlated to indecisiveness, neuroticism, and depression. These results are in the opposite direction compared to the other two factors.
The Revised MS was also examined by each factor separately. The revised alternative search factor (Re- vised MS-A) significantly correlated positively with indecisiveness, avoidance, regret, and neuroticism. The only significant negative correlation was with need for cognition. It was unrelated to life satisfaction, depression, happiness, and optimism. The revised decision difficulty factor (Revised MS-D) correlated positively with indecisiveness, avoidance, regret, neuroticism, and depression. This factor also significantly correlated negatively with life satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and need for cognition. The revised high standards factor (Revised MS- H) significantly correlated positively with life satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and need for cognition. The high standards factor was significantly negatively correlated to indecisiveness, avoidance, neuroticism, and depression. The factor was also unrelated to regret. Similar to the Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-H these results are in the opposite direction compared to the other two factors. In addition, in almost every instance the correlations were stronger for the Revised MS-H than for the Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-H.
The original MTS and our revised MTS are negatively related to indecisiveness, avoidance, neuroticism, and de- pression. They are both positively related to life satisfaction, happiness, optimism and need for cognition. The original MTS is significantly related to regret, which Diab et al. (2008) also found. However, our revised scale is un- related to regret.
4 Discussion
The purpose of the current study was two-fold: to address the construct validity of the maximizing construct, and to address the psychometric properties of the two promi- nent scales in hopes of clarifying conflicting findings. In regards to the construct validity of the maximizing construct, we conclude that the MS and MTS are measuring two distinct constructs. Specifically, the MS appears to be measuring difficulty and restlessness with the search for the best alternative, whereas the MTS is more focused on the search for the best option, regardless of choice dif

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Faktor kesulitan keputusan (Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-D) berkorelasi positif dengan keraguan, menghindari, penyesalan, neuroticism, dan depresi. Faktor ini juga secara signifikan negatif berkorelasi dengan kepuasan hidup, kebahagiaan, optimisme, dan kebutuhan kognisi. Faktor standar tinggi (Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-H) secara signifikan berkorelasi positif dengan penyesalan, kepuasan hidup, kebahagiaan, optimisme, dan kebutuhan kognisi. Faktor standar tinggi secara signifikan negatif berkorelasi dengan keraguan, neuroticism, dan depresi. Hasil ini berada di arah yang berlawanan dibandingkan faktor-faktor lain yang dua.The Revised MS was also examined by each factor separately. The revised alternative search factor (Re- vised MS-A) significantly correlated positively with indecisiveness, avoidance, regret, and neuroticism. The only significant negative correlation was with need for cognition. It was unrelated to life satisfaction, depression, happiness, and optimism. The revised decision difficulty factor (Revised MS-D) correlated positively with indecisiveness, avoidance, regret, neuroticism, and depression. This factor also significantly correlated negatively with life satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and need for cognition. The revised high standards factor (Revised MS- H) significantly correlated positively with life satisfaction, happiness, optimism, and need for cognition. The high standards factor was significantly negatively correlated to indecisiveness, avoidance, neuroticism, and depression. The factor was also unrelated to regret. Similar to the Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-H these results are in the opposite direction compared to the other two factors. In addition, in almost every instance the correlations were stronger for the Revised MS-H than for the Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-H.The original MTS and our revised MTS are negatively related to indecisiveness, avoidance, neuroticism, and de- pression. They are both positively related to life satisfaction, happiness, optimism and need for cognition. The original MTS is significantly related to regret, which Diab et al. (2008) also found. However, our revised scale is un- related to regret.4 DiscussionThe purpose of the current study was two-fold: to address the construct validity of the maximizing construct, and to address the psychometric properties of the two promi- nent scales in hopes of clarifying conflicting findings. In regards to the construct validity of the maximizing construct, we conclude that the MS and MTS are measuring two distinct constructs. Specifically, the MS appears to be measuring difficulty and restlessness with the search for the best alternative, whereas the MTS is more focused on the search for the best option, regardless of choice dif

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Kesulitan Keputusan faktor (Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-D) berkorelasi positif dengan ketidaktegasan, menghindari, penyesalan, neurotisisme, dan depresi. Faktor ini juga secara signifikan berkorelasi negatif dengan kepuasan hidup, kebahagiaan, optimisme, dan kebutuhan untuk kognisi. Faktor yang tinggi standar (Nenkov et al. (2008) MS-H) secara signifikan berkorelasi positif dengan penyesalan, kepuasan hidup, kebahagiaan, optimisme, dan perlu untuk kognisi. Faktor standar tinggi secara signifikan berkorelasi negatif dengan keraguan, neurotisisme, dan depresi. Hasil ini dalam arah yang berlawanan dibandingkan dengan dua faktor lainnya.
MS Revisi juga diperiksa oleh setiap faktor secara terpisah. Direvisi Faktor pencarian alternatif (Re- vised MS-A) secara signifikan berkorelasi positif dengan ketidaktegasan, menghindari, penyesalan, dan neurotisisme. Satu-satunya korelasi negatif yang signifikan adalah dengan kebutuhan kognisi. Itu terkait dengan kepuasan hidup, depresi, kebahagiaan, dan optimisme. Direvisi faktor kesulitan keputusan (Revisi MS-D) berkorelasi positif dengan ketidaktegasan, menghindari, penyesalan, neurotisisme, dan depresi. Faktor ini juga secara signifikan berkorelasi negatif dengan kepuasan hidup, kebahagiaan, optimisme, dan kebutuhan untuk kognisi. Direvisi faktor standar tinggi (Revisi MS- H) secara signifikan berkorelasi positif dengan kepuasan hidup, kebahagiaan, optimisme, dan perlu untuk kognisi. Faktor standar tinggi secara signifikan berkorelasi negatif dengan keraguan, penghindaran, neurotisisme, dan depresi. Faktor ini juga terkait dengan menyesal. Serupa dengan Nenkov dkk. (2008) MS-H hasil ini dalam arah yang berlawanan dibandingkan dengan dua faktor lainnya. Selain itu, di hampir setiap contoh korelasi yang kuat untuk Revisi MS-H daripada untuk Nenkov dkk. (2008) MS-H.
The MTS asli dan MTS direvisi kami berhubungan negatif dengan keraguan, penghindaran, neurotisisme, dan pression de-. Mereka berdua positif terkait dengan kepuasan hidup, kebahagiaan, optimisme dan perlu untuk kognisi. Asli MTS secara signifikan berhubungan dengan menyesal, yang Diab et al. (2008) juga ditemukan. Namun, skala direvisi kami adalah un terkait dengan menyesal.
4 Diskusi
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah dua kali lipat: untuk mengatasi validitas konstruk konstruk memaksimalkan, dan untuk mengatasi sifat psikometrik dari dua skala komponen- promi- harapan mengklarifikasi temuan yang saling bertentangan. Dalam hal validitas konstruk konstruk memaksimalkan, kami menyimpulkan bahwa MS dan MTS mengukur dua konstruksi yang berbeda. Secara khusus, MS tampaknya mengukur kesulitan dan kegelisahan dengan pencarian alternatif terbaik, sedangkan MTS lebih difokuskan pada pencarian untuk pilihan terbaik, terlepas dari dif pilihan