Consistent with recent research that has shown theimportance of unders terjemahan - Consistent with recent research that has shown theimportance of unders Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

Consistent with recent research tha

Consistent with recent research that has shown the
importance of understanding other within-culture
differences such as socio-cultural generations (Egri
& Ralston, 2004) and regional differences (Egri et al.,
2000; Ralston, Egri, Stewart, Terpstra & Yu, 1999;
Ralston, Nguyen & Napier, 1999), this study found
that life stage is a significant predictor variable in
cross-cultural research. While not rejecting the
importance of understanding cross-cultural differences,
this study’s findings show that national culture
is but one of the factors that need to be taken into
consideration when trying to understand the behavior
of different cultural groups (Fu et al., 2001).
Interestingly, as shown in Table 2, we found that for
destructive influence behavior, life stagewas significant
while culturewas not.Given an eta-squared value of .13
for age group and .11 for country group, it appears that
life stage is at least as good, if not a better predictor, than
national culture for determining the acceptability of
destructive influence behaviors. Consistent with life
stage theory, younger Thai and U.S. managers and
professionals attributed significantly higher acceptability
to destructive behaviors than both groups of
older Thai and U.S. managers. Contrary to previous
research that has found significant cultural differences
in the acceptability of unethical and corrupt business
practices (e.g., Husted, 1999; Davis& Ruhe, 2003), we
found no significant country difference in the perceived
acceptability of destructive influence behaviors. While
one possible explanation may be the weak predictive
utility of the Hofstede dimensions (Bond, 2002; Fang,
2003; McSweeney, 2002; Tayeb, 1994; Triandis, 2004),
another possible explanation is that there has been a
cross-cultural convergence regarding the low acceptability
of destructive influence tactics. Specifically, this
finding suggests the predominance of a global business
ideology with respect to unethical business practices
(Kaptein, 2004; Snider, Hill & Martin, 2003).
We found that both life stage and culture contribute
significantly to our understanding of the relative
acceptability of self-indulgent influence strategies.
Consistent with life stage theory, younger Thai and
U.S. managers and professionals viewed self-indulgent
behaviors as being more acceptable than did their
older counterparts. Contrary to expectations based on
Hofstede and Hofstede (2005) values dimensions, the
acceptability of these self-interested influence strategies
was significantly higher in a country (Thailand)
that has a high power distance, collectivistic, and
feminine values orientation, than in a country (U.S.)
with a contrasting values profile.
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
Consistent with recent research that has shown theimportance of understanding other within-culturedifferences such as socio-cultural generations (Egri& Ralston, 2004) and regional differences (Egri et al.,2000; Ralston, Egri, Stewart, Terpstra & Yu, 1999;Ralston, Nguyen & Napier, 1999), this study foundthat life stage is a significant predictor variable incross-cultural research. While not rejecting theimportance of understanding cross-cultural differences,this study’s findings show that national cultureis but one of the factors that need to be taken intoconsideration when trying to understand the behaviorof different cultural groups (Fu et al., 2001).Interestingly, as shown in Table 2, we found that fordestructive influence behavior, life stagewas significantwhile culturewas not.Given an eta-squared value of .13for age group and .11 for country group, it appears thatlife stage is at least as good, if not a better predictor, thannational culture for determining the acceptability ofdestructive influence behaviors. Consistent with lifestage theory, younger Thai and U.S. managers andprofessionals attributed significantly higher acceptabilityto destructive behaviors than both groups ofolder Thai and U.S. managers. Contrary to previousresearch that has found significant cultural differencesin the acceptability of unethical and corrupt businesspractices (e.g., Husted, 1999; Davis& Ruhe, 2003), wefound no significant country difference in the perceivedacceptability of destructive influence behaviors. Whileone possible explanation may be the weak predictiveutility of the Hofstede dimensions (Bond, 2002; Fang,2003; McSweeney, 2002; Tayeb, 1994; Triandis, 2004),another possible explanation is that there has been across-cultural convergence regarding the low acceptabilityof destructive influence tactics. Specifically, thisfinding suggests the predominance of a global businessideology with respect to unethical business practices(Kaptein, 2004; Snider, Hill & Martin, 2003).We found that both life stage and culture contributesignificantly to our understanding of the relativeacceptability of self-indulgent influence strategies.Consistent with life stage theory, younger Thai andU.S. managers and professionals viewed self-indulgentbehaviors as being more acceptable than did theirolder counterparts. Contrary to expectations based onHofstede and Hofstede (2005) values dimensions, theacceptability of these self-interested influence strategieswas significantly higher in a country (Thailand)that has a high power distance, collectivistic, andfeminine values orientation, than in a country (U.S.)with a contrasting values profile.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
Konsisten dengan penelitian terbaru yang telah menunjukkan
pentingnya memahami lain dalam budaya
perbedaan seperti generasi sosial budaya (Egri
& Ralston, 2004) dan perbedaan regional (Egri et al,.
2000; Ralston, Egri, Stewart, Terpstra & Yu, 1999;
Ralston, Nguyen & Napier, 1999), studi ini menemukan
bahwa tahap kehidupan adalah variabel prediktor signifikan dalam
penelitian lintas budaya. Meskipun tidak menolak
pentingnya pemahaman perbedaan lintas-budaya,
temuan studi ini menunjukkan bahwa budaya nasional
hanyalah salah satu faktor yang perlu diambil dalam
pertimbangan ketika mencoba untuk memahami perilaku
dari kelompok budaya yang berbeda (Fu et al., 2001) .
Menariknya, seperti yang ditunjukkan pada Tabel 2 kami menemukan bahwa untuk
mempengaruhi perilaku destruktif, kehidupan stagewas signifikan
sementara culturewas not.Given nilai eta-squared dari 0,13
kelompok usia dan 0,11 untuk kelompok negara, tampak bahwa
tahap kehidupan di setidaknya sama baiknya, jika tidak prediktor yang lebih baik, daripada
kebudayaan nasional untuk menentukan penerimaan
perilaku pengaruh yang merusak. Konsisten dengan kehidupan
tahap teori, lebih muda Thailand dan AS manajer dan
profesional dikaitkan penerimaan secara signifikan lebih tinggi
untuk perilaku destruktif dari kedua kelompok
yang lebih tua Thailand dan manajer AS. Bertentangan dengan sebelumnya
penelitian yang telah menemukan perbedaan budaya yang signifikan
dalam penerimaan bisnis yang tidak etis dan korup
praktek (misalnya, Husted, 1999; Davis & Ruhe, 2003), kami
tidak menemukan perbedaan yang signifikan dalam negeri dirasakan
penerimaan perilaku pengaruh yang merusak. Sementara
salah satu penjelasan yang mungkin dapat menjadi prediksi lemah
utilitas dari dimensi Hofstede (Bond, 2002; Fang,
2003; McSweeney, 2002; Tayeb, 1994; Triandis, 2004),
penjelasan lain yang mungkin adalah bahwa telah terjadi
konvergensi lintas budaya mengenai penerimaan yang rendah
taktik pengaruh yang merusak. Secara khusus, ini
temuan menunjukkan dominasi dari bisnis global
ideologi sehubungan dengan praktik bisnis yang tidak etis
(Kaptein, 2004; Snider, Bukit & Martin, 2003).
Kami menemukan bahwa kedua panggung dan budaya kehidupan kontribusi
signifikan terhadap pemahaman kita tentang relatif
penerimaan strategi Pengaruh memanjakan diri.
Konsisten dengan teori tahap kehidupan, muda Thailand dan
AS manajer profesional dan melihat memanjakan diri sendiri
perilaku sebagai lebih diterima daripada mereka
rekan-rekan yang lebih tua. Bertentangan dengan harapan berdasarkan
Hofstede dan Hofstede (2005) nilai dimensi,
penerimaan strategi pengaruh kepentingan pribadi ini
secara signifikan lebih tinggi di negara (Thailand)
yang memiliki jarak kekuasaan yang tinggi, kolektif, dan
nilai-nilai feminin orientasi, daripada di negara (AS)
dengan nilai profil kontras.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: