Hasil (
Bahasa Indonesia) 1:
[Salinan]Disalin!
High levels of survivorship of all stages of C. capitatawere observed over the range 15–30°C consistent with previous studies (Messenger & Flitters, 1958; Crovetti et al.,1986; Delrio et al., 1986; Vargas et al., 1996). Developmentaltime of C. capitata from egg to adult ranged from 16 to 64days, between 30 and 15°C. These results for the immaturestages are in general agreement with data from previousstudies (Messenger & Flitters, 1958; Tassan et al., 1983;Crovetti et al., 1986; Delrio et al., 1986; Vargas et al., 1996).Values for the temperature threshold and thermalconstant were also consistent with previous studies, exceptfor the period of larval development. In Hawaii, Vargas et al.(1996) found a lower temperature threshold of 5.2°C and athermal constant of 139 DD for the larval stages of C.capitata, when using a linear model and working over arange of constant temperatures from 16 to 32°C, similar tothe range used in our study. These important differencescould result from the utilization of different rearing diets, thestock used, or from rearing conditions (e.g. larval density).These authors, however, recognized that the temperaturethreshold for larval development was probablyunderestimated in their study. The low value of thisthreshold in their study may have resulted from thebehaviour of cohorts: larvae were observed crowding at thebottom of diet cups, probably to keep warm. Indeed, highdensities of larvae in diet produce high levels of metabolicheat which can also affect developmental rate (Tanaka et al.,1972; Hooper, 1978). This behaviour was not observed in ourstudy because of the low density of larvae used. Moreover,the threshold for egg plus larval stage calculated by Tassanet al. (1983) (t = 9.7°C) match our results. As the lineartemperature summation model is less valid at extremes oftemperature, it would be interesting to substantiate our datawith further studies at lower temperatures, close to thedevelopmental threshold, using non-linear models(Schoolfield et al., 1981; Wagner et al., 1984).The lower developmental threshold for ovarianmaturation of C. capitata has been estimated as 16.6°C byTassan et al. (1983) compared to 8.1°C in our study. Thisdifference may be due to laboratory adaptation of the strainstested or to different biological characteristics of C. capitatastrains, as has been observed in other groups of insects(Lopez-Edwards et al., 1999).No previous work has been published on thedevelopment of C. rosa at different temperatures. Noimmature stages of C. rosa were able to develop at 35°C andsurvivorship was low at 30°C. Mean larval developmenttime and duration of ovarian maturation were significantlylonger in C. rosa than C. capitata at all temperatures.The biology of C. catoirii has not been studied before. Thesurvivorship of this species was generally lower than that ofC. rosa and C. capitata at the temperatures studied. Therearing diet used for C. catoirii in this study was developedoriginally for C. rosa and may not be optimal for this species.Lower survivorship rates of C. catoirii may be linked more tothe dietary constraints factors than to intrinsic differences insurvivorship abilities, though this rate is higher than that ofC. rosa and that of C. capitata at certain given temperatures. Itwould be necessary to check the results obtained with C.catoirii on other artificial diets or on host fruits.Linear regressions of developmental rate againsttemperature for all three species show that most of thecorrelation coefficients are close to one, indicating a stronglinearity of the model between 15 and 30°C. The temperaturesummation model is thus a convenient means for estimatingdevelopment times of these species over the range oftemperatures studied. As the upper developmentalthresholds have not been precisely investigated, it would beinteresting to study development at temperatures rangingfrom 30 to 35°C in more detail to establish whether thespecies exhibit distinct temperature preferences.In our study, the duration of ovarian maturation wasused to assess the complete life cycle from egg-laying of onegeneration to egg-laying of the next one. However, Kasana &Aliniazee (1994), in their study on the effect of temperatureon the pre-oviposition period of Rhagoletis completa Cresson(Diptera: Tephritidae), showed that numerous females neverlaid eggs despite the presence of mature eggs in theirovaries. If such a phenomenon should exist in the studiedspecies, then the duration of their whole life-cycle would beunderestimated in our study.Comparisons of developmental times among thedifferent species show that they differ mostly during thelarval stages. As far as pre-imaginal development isconcerned, C. capitata has a shorter life-cycle than the twoother species within the range of temperatures studied. At25°C for instance, the life-cycle of C. capitata (18 days) isthree days shorter than that of C. catoirii and five days
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
