Hasil (
Bahasa Indonesia) 1:
[Salinan]Disalin!
Implications for future researchWhen interpreting the results several limitations of the study are evident. The research design focuses on supermarket retail buyers, and brand perspectives at other levels within retail organisations may well be different. In this research context, the relationships between retailers and supplying manufacturers were well established. These findings may not apply to other retail sectors that either have less concentrated ownership or are more dynamic. In supermarket retailing the range of brands offered to customers is extensive. However, work in other retailer contexts would further test the framework. One example is where distributors sell branded goods to smaller retailers who offer a less extensive range of goods.One measurement issue is the elimination of co-operation and dependence in the scale validation process. These scales had previously assessed retailers' perceptions of manufacturers, not brands. Deletion of the co-operation construct may mean that co-operation with a manufacturer on brand matters occurred anyway and was less of a concern. The deletion of the dependence construct may indicate that given the large number of brands in supermarkets, this scale may not be sufficiently sensitive to measure brand dependence from a retailer perspective.In this study we also focus on the demand side of brands but not the supply side. Research could investigate supply-side issues such as the effect of service quality, sales force relationships and other demand issues such as the general marketing expertise of manufacturer. Furthermore, we used mainly grocery categories where the retailer resource investment is less than other supermarket categories such as chilled and frozen foods. Research could examine the effects of manufacturer brands in categories that require greater levels of retailer investment.ConclusionThe research demonstrates that manufacturers' brands have several benefits for retailers, which influence retailer satisfaction with the brand, performance trust and satisfaction. Thus, our research challenges the view that manufacturers' brands are not as important to retailers. The findings also show that the value of a manufacturers' brand to retailers is not only financial but also includes three other benefits that affect retailer brand evaluations.Manufacturer brand benefits to retailers derive not only from brand equity but also from the relationship with the retailer's customer, the financial benefits and the manufacturer support of the brand which influences retailer satisfaction with the brand. These brand benefits also impact differently on performance, trust and commitment. Financial benefits affect retailers' assessment of brand performance, while brand equity affects retailer commitment towards the brand, but not retailer satisfaction. Retailer satisfaction with a manufacturer's brand influences in-store brand performance, brand commitment and brand trust. Thus it is not just the brand name but also the associated brand benefits that create "trade leverage" for manufacturers.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..