- Teks
- Sejarah
In yet another article, Gorsuch (19
In yet another article, Gorsuch (1990) contended that researchers should not develop
new scales until a clear need can be established on one of four bases: (1) existing measures
are not psychometrically adequate to the task; (2) conceptual or theoretical issues
demand modification of existing measures; (3) no existing measures appear useful within
a specific clinical population; or (4) there are no measures available for particular constructs.
Indeed, modification of existing measures, the second criterion listed above, is
sometimes necessary in this young and developing field, especially since people’s understanding
of religion appears, as noted earlier, to be undergoing change. Furthermore, religious
and spiritual measures designed for clinical populations (the third criterion above)
are rare, and new or revised measures for such populations may be necessary. And, surely,
with regard to the fourth criterion, there are specific functional or operational relationships
that religion and spirituality may have with other variables that call for specific new
measures (e.g., religious coping with stressful agents). All too often, however, Gorsuch’s
advice has been largely ignored and many new measures, some unnecessarily duplicating
other measures, have been constructed. In fact, since Hill and Hood’s (1999) edited volume
reviewing 125 scales, many new scales (some of which are discussed in this chapter)
have been developed, perhaps in some cases unnecessarily so.
new scales until a clear need can be established on one of four bases: (1) existing measures
are not psychometrically adequate to the task; (2) conceptual or theoretical issues
demand modification of existing measures; (3) no existing measures appear useful within
a specific clinical population; or (4) there are no measures available for particular constructs.
Indeed, modification of existing measures, the second criterion listed above, is
sometimes necessary in this young and developing field, especially since people’s understanding
of religion appears, as noted earlier, to be undergoing change. Furthermore, religious
and spiritual measures designed for clinical populations (the third criterion above)
are rare, and new or revised measures for such populations may be necessary. And, surely,
with regard to the fourth criterion, there are specific functional or operational relationships
that religion and spirituality may have with other variables that call for specific new
measures (e.g., religious coping with stressful agents). All too often, however, Gorsuch’s
advice has been largely ignored and many new measures, some unnecessarily duplicating
other measures, have been constructed. In fact, since Hill and Hood’s (1999) edited volume
reviewing 125 scales, many new scales (some of which are discussed in this chapter)
have been developed, perhaps in some cases unnecessarily so.
1499/5000
In yet another article, Gorsuch (1990) contended that researchers should not developnew scales until a clear need can be established on one of four bases: (1) existing measuresare not psychometrically adequate to the task; (2) conceptual or theoretical issuesdemand modification of existing measures; (3) no existing measures appear useful withina specific clinical population; or (4) there are no measures available for particular constructs.Indeed, modification of existing measures, the second criterion listed above, issometimes necessary in this young and developing field, especially since people’s understandingof religion appears, as noted earlier, to be undergoing change. Furthermore, religiousand spiritual measures designed for clinical populations (the third criterion above)are rare, and new or revised measures for such populations may be necessary. And, surely,with regard to the fourth criterion, there are specific functional or operational relationshipsthat religion and spirituality may have with other variables that call for specific newmeasures (e.g., religious coping with stressful agents). All too often, however, Gorsuch’sadvice has been largely ignored and many new measures, some unnecessarily duplicatingother measures, have been constructed. In fact, since Hill and Hood’s (1999) edited volumereviewing 125 scales, many new scales (some of which are discussed in this chapter)have been developed, perhaps in some cases unnecessarily so.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
In yet another article, Gorsuch (1990) contended that researchers should not develop
new scales until a clear need can be established on one of four bases: (1) existing measures
are not psychometrically adequate to the task; (2) conceptual or theoretical issues
demand modification of existing measures; (3) no existing measures appear useful within
a specific clinical population; or (4) there are no measures available for particular constructs.
Indeed, modification of existing measures, the second criterion listed above, is
sometimes necessary in this young and developing field, especially since people’s understanding
of religion appears, as noted earlier, to be undergoing change. Furthermore, religious
and spiritual measures designed for clinical populations (the third criterion above)
are rare, and new or revised measures for such populations may be necessary. And, surely,
with regard to the fourth criterion, there are specific functional or operational relationships
that religion and spirituality may have with other variables that call for specific new
measures (e.g., religious coping with stressful agents). All too often, however, Gorsuch’s
advice has been largely ignored and many new measures, some unnecessarily duplicating
other measures, have been constructed. In fact, since Hill and Hood’s (1999) edited volume
reviewing 125 scales, many new scales (some of which are discussed in this chapter)
have been developed, perhaps in some cases unnecessarily so.
new scales until a clear need can be established on one of four bases: (1) existing measures
are not psychometrically adequate to the task; (2) conceptual or theoretical issues
demand modification of existing measures; (3) no existing measures appear useful within
a specific clinical population; or (4) there are no measures available for particular constructs.
Indeed, modification of existing measures, the second criterion listed above, is
sometimes necessary in this young and developing field, especially since people’s understanding
of religion appears, as noted earlier, to be undergoing change. Furthermore, religious
and spiritual measures designed for clinical populations (the third criterion above)
are rare, and new or revised measures for such populations may be necessary. And, surely,
with regard to the fourth criterion, there are specific functional or operational relationships
that religion and spirituality may have with other variables that call for specific new
measures (e.g., religious coping with stressful agents). All too often, however, Gorsuch’s
advice has been largely ignored and many new measures, some unnecessarily duplicating
other measures, have been constructed. In fact, since Hill and Hood’s (1999) edited volume
reviewing 125 scales, many new scales (some of which are discussed in this chapter)
have been developed, perhaps in some cases unnecessarily so.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.
- Lebih baik diam dari pada menjelaskan ap
- Jika tidak ada model seperti ini bagaima
- Tuhan menyuruhku ke bumi, untuk mengikat
- aku sangat menyesal melakukan kebodohan
- sepanjang
- Ok dear waiting saya kirim foto sexsi sa
- sepanjang
- Pak narjan mengatakan
- bersukacitah dalam pengharapan, sabarlah
- aku bertelut tuk mohon maafmu, maafkanla
- bersukacitalah dalam pengharapan, sabarl
- Ok dear waiting saya kirim foto sexsi sa
- Aku baru saja sampai di bali lagi,tapi a
- Jangan ganggu
- Aku baru saja sampai di bali lagi,tapi a
- Do not disturb
- Aku baru saja sampai di bali lagi,tapi a
- tolong jangan bebani fikiran aku dengan
- Aku baru saja sampai di bali lagi,tapi a
- Dengan hormat. Kami dari pt sodara sport
- Lebih baik aku diam
- tolong jangan bebani fikiran aku dengan
- Aku baru saja sampai di bali lagi,tapi a
- Romans is an occasional letter written b
