I would counter that the Creator endowed me with my intellect and my a terjemahan - I would counter that the Creator endowed me with my intellect and my a Melayu Bagaimana mengatakan

I would counter that the Creator en

I would counter that the Creator endowed me with my intellect and my ability to utilize and develop tools to better survive in my environment and to refuse to make full use of all that has been made available to me is the grossest of insults to that which Created me! The prehistoric Shaman who first ground up a cactus between two rocks and boiled it in a clay pot with water and lemon juice was utilizing the full scope of the technology available to him at the time... one can best believe that had he had access to such things as mek, he would surely have used it! There is nothing inherantly spiritual about crude prehistoric technology that is not present in modern technology...

the simple fact of the matter is that the more pure a given drug becomes the safer it becomes for the end user (more accurate dosing along with the absence of potentially dangerous and unknown impurities translates into greater safety for those who consume the products) and also the more potent it becomes... many people steadfastly believe that there are additional alkaloids present in trichocerus cacti than mescaline, however, long, long experimentation (several years) has convinced swim otherwise... trichocerus cacti do not share the same alkaloid profile with peyote cacti which are know to legitimate science to contain several additional alkaloids, a number of which are known to be psychoactive in one way or another... every indication seems to point to the trichocerus cacti containing but a single alkaloid, mescaline...

swim has not, however, performed TLC or other such direct investigations of the material to verify this... most of the reason he believes as he does is based on observations of the melting points of very highly purified samples of trichocerus based mescaline... swim has successfully produced samples that routinely and predictably melt within fractions of a degree of published known values for the alkaloid... were additional alkaloids presnt, crystallization alone would not seperate them (chromatography or other such advanced methods would be required) from one another and the resulting products' melting points would be divergant from published values for the pure substance...

just as certain impurities in *************** can radically modify the percieved effects of the drug, so do impurities modify the percieved effects of mescaline...

swim finds that, as purity of the material increases, body load decreases and the effect becomes more cerebral and more "clear"... above all, same as with *************** HCl, the potency of the material seems to increase exponentially as purity increases... it seems the impurities present do much more than merely throw off the dosing... they seem to invariably inhibit the actions of almost all drugs... true, some impurities in **** seem to intensify the rush but this inevitably comes at a cost of a shorter duration at best or obnoxious and/or unhealthy (even dangerous) side effects at worse... mescaline, being a hallucinogen that shares the same phenethylamine core with the true amphetamines is also something of a stimulant and seems to follow the exact same pattern.

in spite of the volumes swim and others write in attempts to explain this technique, it really is an extremely simple and easy proceedure... much, much more foolproof than regular dual solvent crystalization techniques (ie: those that use water and acetone or an alcohol and acetone...)
Tregar (May, 2007):
Quote
Can the sanchez just be added to boiling MEK on a hotplate outside, allowed to cool, then put in freezer for a while till xtals formed, then filtered off under vacuum? Or is there more to it than that, what is with the adding of distilled water to get out cloudiness...don't understand any of that.
Avalo (May, 2007): Excellent answer, thanks so much for this Avalo, learned alot. NOW I understand.
Quote
No, that wouldn't work because mescaline.hcl is practically insoluble in MEK, but it is soluble in water. The MEK thing is a dual solvent recrystalisation: MEK and water. The impurities are soluble in both water and mescaline, but are slightly more soluble in MEK then the mescaline is. That's why the mescaline will drop out first.

This has to be done quite precisely because if you add too much water, then not all your mescaline will precipitate out. But if you don't add enough water, then the impurities stay stuck to mescaline powder instead of dissolving into the solution. So you have to use well dried MEK, and once it's boiling, you add 1 drop of water at a time, just until all the mescaline powder dissolves. This gets both the impurities and the mescaline dissolved in the MEK/water mix. And then the solution becomes clear instead of shimmery. It would help if you could stir the solution with a glass rod in between water drop additions, as this helps get everything mixed round well, and would help to avoid adding too much water.
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Melayu) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
I would counter that the Creator endowed me with my intellect and my ability to utilize and develop tools to better survive in my environment and to refuse to make full use of all that has been made available to me is the grossest of insults to that which Created me! The prehistoric Shaman who first ground up a cactus between two rocks and boiled it in a clay pot with water and lemon juice was utilizing the full scope of the technology available to him at the time... one can best believe that had he had access to such things as mek, he would surely have used it! There is nothing inherantly spiritual about crude prehistoric technology that is not present in modern technology...the simple fact of the matter is that the more pure a given drug becomes the safer it becomes for the end user (more accurate dosing along with the absence of potentially dangerous and unknown impurities translates into greater safety for those who consume the products) and also the more potent it becomes... many people steadfastly believe that there are additional alkaloids present in trichocerus cacti than mescaline, however, long, long experimentation (several years) has convinced swim otherwise... trichocerus cacti do not share the same alkaloid profile with peyote cacti which are know to legitimate science to contain several additional alkaloids, a number of which are known to be psychoactive in one way or another... every indication seems to point to the trichocerus cacti containing but a single alkaloid, mescaline...swim has not, however, performed TLC or other such direct investigations of the material to verify this... most of the reason he believes as he does is based on observations of the melting points of very highly purified samples of trichocerus based mescaline... swim has successfully produced samples that routinely and predictably melt within fractions of a degree of published known values for the alkaloid... were additional alkaloids presnt, crystallization alone would not seperate them (chromatography or other such advanced methods would be required) from one another and the resulting products' melting points would be divergant from published values for the pure substance...just as certain impurities in *************** can radically modify the percieved effects of the drug, so do impurities modify the percieved effects of mescaline...swim finds that, as purity of the material increases, body load decreases and the effect becomes more cerebral and more "clear"... above all, same as with *************** HCl, the potency of the material seems to increase exponentially as purity increases... it seems the impurities present do much more than merely throw off the dosing... they seem to invariably inhibit the actions of almost all drugs... true, some impurities in **** seem to intensify the rush but this inevitably comes at a cost of a shorter duration at best or obnoxious and/or unhealthy (even dangerous) side effects at worse... mescaline, being a hallucinogen that shares the same phenethylamine core with the true amphetamines is also something of a stimulant and seems to follow the exact same pattern.in spite of the volumes swim and others write in attempts to explain this technique, it really is an extremely simple and easy proceedure... much, much more foolproof than regular dual solvent crystalization techniques (ie: those that use water and acetone or an alcohol and acetone...)Tregar (May, 2007):QuoteCan the sanchez just be added to boiling MEK on a hotplate outside, allowed to cool, then put in freezer for a while till xtals formed, then filtered off under vacuum? Or is there more to it than that, what is with the adding of distilled water to get out cloudiness...don't understand any of that.Avalo (May, 2007): Excellent answer, thanks so much for this Avalo, learned alot. NOW I understand.QuoteNo, that wouldn't work because mescaline.hcl is practically insoluble in MEK, but it is soluble in water. The MEK thing is a dual solvent recrystalisation: MEK and water. The impurities are soluble in both water and mescaline, but are slightly more soluble in MEK then the mescaline is. That's why the mescaline will drop out first.This has to be done quite precisely because if you add too much water, then not all your mescaline will precipitate out. But if you don't add enough water, then the impurities stay stuck to mescaline powder instead of dissolving into the solution. So you have to use well dried MEK, and once it's boiling, you add 1 drop of water at a time, just until all the mescaline powder dissolves. This gets both the impurities and the mescaline dissolved in the MEK/water mix. And then the solution becomes clear instead of shimmery. It would help if you could stir the solution with a glass rod in between water drop additions, as this helps get everything mixed round well, and would help to avoid adding too much water.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Melayu) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
Saya akan bertindak balas terhadap perkara Pencipta dikurniakan saya dengan akal saya dan keupayaan saya untuk menggunakan dan membangunkan alat untuk lebih baik hidup dalam persekitaran saya dan menolak untuk menggunakan sepenuhnya semua yang telah diberikan kepada saya adalah grossest penghinaan kepada suatu yang Dibuat saya! The Shaman prasejarah yang pertama dikisar kaktus antara dua batu-batu dan direbus dalam periuk tanah liat dengan air dan lemon jus telah menggunakan skop sepenuhnya teknologi yang ada untuk beliau pada masa yang ... satu terbaik boleh percaya bahawa jika dia mempunyai akses kepada perkara-perkara seperti mek, dia pasti telah menggunakannya! Tiada apa yang inherantly rohani mengenai teknologi prasejarah mentah yang tidak hadir dalam teknologi moden ... fakta mudah perkara itu adalah yang lebih tulen dadah yang diberikan menjadi dos yang lebih selamat ia menjadi untuk pengguna akhir (lebih tepat bersama-sama dengan ketiadaan yang berpotensi kekotoran berbahaya dan tidak diketahui diterjemahkan ke dalam keselamatan yang lebih besar bagi mereka yang mengambil produk) dan juga lebih kuat ia menjadi ... ramai orang sabar dan percaya bahawa terdapat alkaloid tambahan di dalam trichocerus cacti daripada mescaline, bagaimanapun, panjang, eksperimentasi panjang ( beberapa tahun) telah meyakinkan berenang sebaliknya ... cacti trichocerus tidak berkongsi profil alkaloid yang sama dengan peyote cacti yang tahu untuk sains yang sah untuk mengandungi beberapa alkaloid tambahan, sebilangan yang dikenali sebagai psikoaktif dalam satu cara atau yang lain .. . setiap petunjuk seolah-olah menunjukkan cacti trichocerus mengandungi tetapi alkaloid tunggal, mescaline ... berenang tidak, bagaimanapun, yang dilakukan TLC atau lain-lain siasatan langsung apa-apa bahan untuk mengesahkan ini ... kebanyakan sebab dia percaya kerana dia merupakan berdasarkan pemerhatian daripada takat lebur sampel sangat sangat disucikan trichocerus berdasarkan mescaline ... berenang telah berjaya menghasilkan sampel yang rutin dan boleh diramal mencairkan dalam pecahan tahap nilai-nilai yang diterbitkan terkenal dengan alkaloid ... adalah alkaloid tambahan presnt , penghabluran sahaja tidak akan memisahkan mereka (kromatografi atau lain-lain kaedah canggih seperti dikehendaki) dari yang lain dan takat lebur produk yang terhasil 'akan divergant daripada nilai diterbitkan untuk bahan tulen ... hanya kekotoran yang tertentu dalam **** *********** radikal boleh mengubah suai kesan percieved dadah, jadi jangan kekotoran mengubah suai kesan percieved daripada mescaline ... berenang mendapati bahawa, sebagai kesucian bahan meningkat, penurunan beban badan dan kesan menjadi lebih serebrum dan lebih "jelas" ... di atas semua, sama seperti dengan *************** HCl, potensi bahan seolah-olah meningkat dengan pesat sebagai kesucian meningkatkan ia ... seolah-olah kekotoran hadir melakukan lebih daripada sekadar melepaskan dos ... mereka seolah-olah sentiasa menghalang tindakan hampir semua ubat ... benar, beberapa kekotoran dalam **** seolah-olah meningkatkan tergesa-gesa tetapi ini tidak dapat tidak datang pada kos dalam jangka masa yang lebih pendek yang terbaik atau menjijikkan dan / atau tidak sihat (walaupun berbahaya) kesan sampingan sama teruk ... mescaline, sebagai halusinogen yang berkongsi teras phenethylamine yang sama dengan amfetamin benar juga sesuatu perangsang dan seolah-olah ikut . corak yang sama tepat walaupun jumlah berenang dan lain-lain menulis dalam percubaan untuk menjelaskan teknik ini, ia benar-benar adalah proceedure amat mudah dan mudah ... banyak lagi foolproof daripada teknik crystalization pelarut dual biasa (iaitu: orang-orang yang menggunakan air dan aseton atau alkohol dan aseton ...) Tregar (Mei 2007): Quote Bolehkah sanchez hanya ditambah kepada mendidih MEK atas plat panas di luar, dibiarkan sejuk, kemudian dimasukkan ke dalam peti sejuk untuk sementara sehingga xtals dibentuk, kemudian ditapis off di bawah vakum? Atau ada yang lebih dari itu, apa yang dengan menambah air suling untuk keluar keadaan mendung ... tidak faham apa-apa itu. Avalo (Mei 2007): jawapan yang sangat baik, terima kasih banyak untuk Avalo ini, belajar banyak. SEKARANG saya faham. Quote Tidak, itu tidak akan berfungsi kerana mescaline.hcl boleh dikatakan tidak larut dalam MEK, tetapi ia adalah larut dalam air. Perkara MEK adalah recrystalisation pelarut dua: MEK dan air. Kekotoran larut dalam air dan mescaline, tetapi lebih sedikit larut dalam MEK kemudian mescaline adalah. Itulah sebabnya mescaline akan jatuh dahulu. Ini perlu dilakukan agak tepat kerana jika anda menambah terlalu banyak air, maka tidak semua mescaline anda akan mendakan keluar. Tetapi jika anda tidak menambah air yang mencukupi, maka kekotoran tinggal melekat mescaline serbuk dan bukannya membubarkan ke dalam penyelesaian. Jadi, anda perlu menggunakan juga kering MEK, dan apabila ia mendidih, anda menambah 1 setitik air pada satu masa, hanya sehingga semua larut serbuk mescaline. Ini mendapat kedua-dua kekotoran dan mescaline dibubarkan dalam campuran / air MEK. Dan kemudian penyelesaian menjadi jelas bukan shimmery. Ia akan membantu jika anda boleh kacau penyelesaian dengan rod kaca di antara penambahan drop air, kerana ini membantu mendapatkan semua pusingan campuran dengan baik, dan akan membantu untuk mengelakkan menambah terlalu banyak air.


















Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: