Great help when building new course

Great help when building new course with Constructivism theory is hidden in case studies. This practical
examples can be used as a basis for theoretical reflection and also promote active postures in students. For example
the survey conducted by (Eroglu et. al., 2013) on 79 students from industrial design departments of various
universities in Turkey was beside other areas aimed on satisfaction/dissatisfaction with their ergonomics education.
The mean value of the answer was 2.6 from maximal 5 points, which is below average. Regarding the concrete
reasons reflecting students dissatisfaction, these were coded into five categories: instructor was incapable (30,2%),
insufficient applied studies (41,9%), syllabus was not suitable for industrial design (11,6%), course duration was
short (4,7%) and finally the syllabus was found poor (30,2%). From these result we can see that “insufficient applied
studies” was the most mentioned category and obviously the most desired one. Most of the respondents indicated
that the education they received was mainly theoretical. Their general idea was, for industrial design education,
ergonomics should be thought through hands-on application and case studies.
Although we would like to put emphasis on Constructivism approach in proposed course we need to present some
of the basic knowledge to the students to unify everybody’s view. Knowledge base of ergonomics can be described
by four levels (Bridger, 2012):
x Core knowledge: fundamental concepts in basic sciences, statistics and engineering that underpin research and
practice.
x Basic applications: Principally, the use of core knowledge to optimize user-device interaction and, more
generally, person-environment fit.
x Tools and processes: Implementation of core knowledge and data into structured design and risk assessment
tools. Processes for human-machine integration in system design.
x System integration: Macroergonomic and systems-theoretical constructs used to manage the application of
ergonomics in systems design and development. Ergonomics as a tool for policy development.

Hasil (Melayu) 1:

Besar membantu apabila bangunan baru kursus dengan Teori Konstruktivisme yang tersembunyi dalam kajian kes. Praktikal inicontoh-contoh boleh digunakan sebagai asas untuk mencerminkan teori dan juga menggalakkan postur aktif pelajar. Sebagai contohkaji selidik yang dijalankan oleh (Eroglu et. al., 2013) 79 pelajar dari Jabatan Reka bentuk perindustrian kepada pelbagaiUniversiti-Universiti di Turki adalah di sebelah kawasan-kawasan lain yang bertujuan pada kepuasan/ketidakpuasan hati pelajaran ergonomik.Nilai min jawapan adalah 2.6 daripada maksima 5 mata, yang adalah di bawah purata. Mengenai konkritsebab-sebab yang mencerminkan rasa tidak puas hati pelajar, ini telah dikodkan kepada lima Kategori: pengajar tidak berupaya (30,2%),tidak mencukupi digunakan kajian (41,9%), sukatan pelajaran adalah tidak sesuai untuk Reka bentuk perindustrian (11,6%), tempoh kursus adalahpendek (4,7%) dan akhirnya sukatan pelajaran telah dijumpai miskin (30,2%). Daripada keputusan ini, kita dapat melihat bahawa "tidak mencukupi digunakanKajian"adalah kategori Tempahan tersebut dan sudah tentu orang yang dikehendaki. Kebanyakan responden menyatakanbahawa pendidikan yang diterima adalah terutamanya teori. Idea umum mereka adalah, Reka bentuk perindustrian pendidikan,ergonomik perlu berfikir melalui aplikasi praktikal dan kajian kes.Walaupun kita ingin meletakkan penekanan terhadap pendekatan konstruktivisme dalam cadangan kursus yang kami perlu menyerahkan sebahagianpengetahuan asas kepada pelajar untuk menyatukan pandangan semua orang. Pangkalan pengetahuan ergonomik boleh ditakrifkanby four levels (Bridger, 2012):x Core knowledge: fundamental concepts in basic sciences, statistics and engineering that underpin research andpractice.x Basic applications: Principally, the use of core knowledge to optimize user-device interaction and, moregenerally, person-environment fit.x Tools and processes: Implementation of core knowledge and data into structured design and risk assessmenttools. Processes for human-machine integration in system design.x System integration: Macroergonomic and systems-theoretical constructs used to manage the application ofergonomics in systems design and development. Ergonomics as a tool for policy development.