This variety and historical scope s

This variety and historical scope sets the task for a commentary on the book of Micah. A commentary must undertake first of all to identif,’ the individual sayings collected in the book and to determine their original historical setting so that each can be heard in its own right. It must attempt to trace and follow the stages in which the sayings were collected and seek to discern the way they are to be under.. stood as the word of YHWH in the new and broader context in which they were set. Was the process of collecting and arranging more or less arbitrary and based only on a concern with the past and its tradition, or did it grow out of a perception of the meaning and coherence of larger groupings as a testimony to YHWH? A commentary must also seek to do justice to the present form of the book as the final stage in the shaping of a prophetic witness to YHWH. What is its coherence? Is there a prophetic intention which pervades the whole and makes the book itself an instance of prophecy as well as a hermeneutical context in which its parts are to be heard? The last question involves more than simply a consideration of the final stage of redaction. It asks whether the book itself can be read with a measure of continuity and unity as prophecy in a larger sense, heard as ‘the word of YHWH’ in a fashion that does justice to the title.
In the following discussion, the last question is dealt with first in hope that an awareness of the content, arrangement, and integrating features of the book will provide a point of vantage for dealing with the mission of Micah as the book’s origin and then with an attempt to discern the history of its formation. The comment on single passages will point to the way the sayings are related to their literary context as part of the whole and to their place in process of forming the book.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Ini variasi dan sejarah lingkup menetapkan tugas untuk komentar pada kitab Mikha. Komentar harus pertama-tama berupaya identif,' kata-kata individu dikumpulkan dalam buku dan untuk menentukan mereka asli sejarah pengaturan sehingga masing-masing dapat didengar dalam dirinya sendiri. Itu harus berusaha untuk melacak dan mengikuti tahap di mana perkataan-perkataan dikumpulkan dan berusaha untuk melihat cara mereka berada di bawah... berdiri sebagai firman YHWH dalam konteks yang baru dan lebih luas di mana yang telah ditentukan. Adalah proses mengumpulkan dan mengatur lebih atau kurang sewenang-wenang dan hanya berdasarkan keprihatinan dengan masa lalu dan tradisi, atau apakah itu tumbuh dari persepsi dari makna dan koherensi dari kelompok-kelompok yang lebih besar sebagai kesaksian untuk YHWH? Komentar harus juga mencari untuk melakukan keadilan ke bentuk sekarang buku sebagai tahap akhir dalam membentuk saksi nubuatan YHWH. Apa yang dimaksud dengan koherensi? Apakah ada niat kenabian yang meliputi seluruh dan membuat buku itu sendiri sebuah instance dari nubuatan serta hermeneutical konteks di mana bagiannya yang terdengar? Pertanyaan terakhir melibatkan lebih dari sekedar pertimbangan tahap akhir dari Redaksi. It meminta Apakah buku itu sendiri dapat dibaca dengan ukuran kesinambungan dan kesatuan sebagai nubuatan dalam pengertian yang lebih luas, terdengar seperti 'kata YHWH' dengan cara yang tidak adil kepada judul.In the following discussion, the last question is dealt with first in hope that an awareness of the content, arrangement, and integrating features of the book will provide a point of vantage for dealing with the mission of Micah as the book’s origin and then with an attempt to discern the history of its formation. The comment on single passages will point to the way the sayings are related to their literary context as part of the whole and to their place in process of forming the book.