The purpose of this investigation w

The purpose of this investigation was to determine if there was a difference in the development of effective
urban teacher characteristics between student interns placed in either an urban Professional Development School
environment or an urban non-Professional Development School environment. Student interns in urban universities
with partnerships in neighboring urban school districts participated in this investigation. The Urban Teacher
Selection Interview was used to assess 10 characteristics, including (1) Persistence, (2) Values Children’s Learning,
(3) Putting Ideas into Practice, (4) Approach to At-Risk Students, (5) Professional/Personal Orientation to Students,
(6) The Bureaucracy, (7) Fallibility, (8) Teacher Success, (9) Student Success, and (10) Planning and Organization.
Assessments were completed before and after subjects participated in internship experiences. Using a causal
comparative research design, pre- and post-test scores were compared using Descriptive Statistics and an Analysis
of Covariance (ANCOVA) statistical procedure. The results communicated that although there were individual
growth and declines for the student interns on each of the characteristics, there was not a significant difference
between the two groups. The results suggest that a link between the Professional Development School reform effort
and the development of effective urban teacher characteristics could not be established.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada perbedaan dalam pengembangan efektif
karakteristik guru perkotaan antara mahasiswa magang ditempatkan di salah satu Pengembangan Sekolah Profesional perkotaan
lingkungan atau lingkungan non-profesional Pembangunan Sekolah perkotaan. Magang mahasiswa di universitas-universitas perkotaan
dengan kemitraan di sekolah kabupaten kota tetangga berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Urban Guru
Seleksi Wawancara digunakan untuk menilai 10 karakteristik, termasuk (1) Kegigihan, (2) Nilai Belajar Anak,
(3) Menempatkan Situs ke Praktik, (4) Pendekatan At-Risk Mahasiswa, (5) Profesional / Personal Orientasi untuk Mahasiswa,
(6) Birokrasi, (7) Falibilitas, (8) Guru Sukses, (9) Sukses Mahasiswa, dan (10) Perencanaan dan Organisasi.
Penilaian diselesaikan sebelum dan sesudah pelajaran berpartisipasi dalam pengalaman magang. Menggunakan kausal
desain penelitian komparatif, skor pra dan pasca tes dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Statistik Deskriptif dan Analisis
dari Kovarian (ANCOVA) prosedur statistik. Hasil dikomunikasikan bahwa meskipun ada individu
pertumbuhan dan penurunan untuk magang siswa pada masing-masing karakteristik, tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan
antara kedua kelompok. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hubungan antara upaya reformasi Pengembangan Sekolah Profesional
dan pengembangan karakteristik guru perkotaan yang efektif tidak dapat ditentukan.