As a first limitation, there might

As a first limitation, there might be concerns with common method variance (Podsakoff,MacKenzie, & Podsakoff, 2012). However, in line with procedural/statistical recommendationsby Podsakoff et al. (2012), we counterbalanced the order of all items and scales,ensured anonymity, and temporally separated the concepts under study. Second, theremight be concerns with the use of self-reports. However, self-reports are the conventionalmethod for collecting data on PCB, cynicism, and CWBs due to their highly subjectivenature. Nonetheless, CWB-O/CWB-S might be particularly susceptible to social desirability.However, meta-analytical research (Berry, Carpenter, & Barratt, 2012) indicates thatself-reports of CWB are more reliable and valid compared to observer-reports.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

As a first limitation, there might be concerns with common method variance (Podsakoff,
MacKenzie, & Podsakoff, 2012). However, in line with procedural/statistical recommendations
by Podsakoff et al. (2012), we counterbalanced the order of all items and scales,
ensured anonymity, and temporally separated the concepts under study. Second, there
might be concerns with the use of self-reports. However, self-reports are the conventional
method for collecting data on PCB, cynicism, and CWBs due to their highly subjective
nature. Nonetheless, CWB-O/CWB-S might be particularly susceptible to social desirability.
However, meta-analytical research (Berry, Carpenter, & Barratt, 2012) indicates that
laporan diri dari CWB lebih handal dan valid dibandingkan dengan pengamat-laporan.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Sebagai batasan pertama, mungkin ada kekhawatiran dengan metode umum varians (Podsakoff,
MacKenzie, & Podsakoff, 2012). Namun, sejalan dengan rekomendasi prosedural/Statistik
oleh Podsakoff et al. (2012), kita mengimbangi urutan semua item dan skala,
memastikan anonimitas, dan secara temporal memisahkan konsep di bawah studi. Kedua, ada
mungkin kekhawatiran dengan penggunaan laporan diri. Namun, Self-laporan adalah konvensional
metode untuk mengumpulkan data pada PCB, sinisme, dan CWBs karena mereka sangat subjektif
Alam. Namun, CWB-O/CWB-S mungkin sangat rentan terhadap keinginan sosial.
Namun, penelitian meta-analitis (Berry, Carpenter, & Barratt, 2012) menunjukkan bahwa
Self-laporan dari CWB lebih dapat diandalkan dan berlaku dibandingkan dengan pengamat-laporan.