As seen in Table 1, according to th

As seen in Table 1, according to the scores of the AAT pre-test, there was no difference between GIG and
RWPG (t=1,576; p>.05.). This finding supports the assumption that the groups should be considered equal.
However, according to the scores of the post-test, there was a significant difference between GIG and RWPG
(t=2,975, p

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

As seen in Table 1, according to the scores of the AAT pre-test, there was no difference between GIG andRWPG (t=1,576; p>.05.). This finding supports the assumption that the groups should be considered equal.However, according to the scores of the post-test, there was a significant difference between GIG and RWPG(t=2,975, p<.05). The results of this analysis show that reading-writing-presentation method is more successfulthan group investigation method.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Seperti yang terlihat pada Tabel 1, sesuai dengan nilai dari AAT pre-test, tidak ada perbedaan antara GIG dan
RWPG (t = 1.576;. p> .05). Temuan ini mendukung asumsi bahwa kelompok harus dianggap sama.
Namun, menurut sejumlah pos-tes, ada perbedaan yang signifikan antara GIG dan RWPG
(t = 2.975, p <.05). Hasil analisis ini menunjukkan bahwa metode membaca-menulis-presentasi lebih sukses
dibandingkan dengan metode investigasi kelompok.