Dear TantyThanks for the inputs and

Dear Tanty
Thanks for the inputs and explanations.

I tried to call but could not get through. I will try again later. Meanwhile, please be assured that we are not trying to stop the training. It is a good idea and very logical. We understand that impacts on your longer term planning.

Participant Numbers
My main concern is the number of people involved in training. 74 people is too many for any training in my opinion. As an experienced trainer I think you would agree with me? The participants do not always stay engaged at that number - added to long training days I think you will find it really challenging.

So are we agreed that we can split this into 2 training sessions in order to make the training more effective? The timing can be up to you guys. The one or two month was just an example (because of the pusas period). I know this is difficult with puasa coming. So let's see what is possible.

I would prefer to pay more for an effective training than to attempt to train such a large group. Perhaps the BPBD can identify the best times and availability of staff. I know this might make them a bit upset if certain decisions have already been made - but please try and we will support as much as possible from here.

Training schedule
As you have been involved in this kind of training before have you found that participants have struggled with 13 hour days? If this is the wish of BPBD to have the long training days and they are aware of the commitment, then I am happy. Perhaps this can be monitored and reviewed during the first phase training? Feedback from participants etc? And maybe changed in the next training??

Costs
It is unusual to hold a live-in, full-board training in the city where all participants come from and this becomes something I need to justify. From a cost-benefit perspective I need to report to MC and USAID on why and live-in training is justified. I assume this step is taken due to the long hours of the training? If yes, then Djoni's question would be the first one asked "why not add extra day/s and reduce the board costs?". This is the obvious devils-advocate question and one I would ask myself when developing my justification. We need a good reason/s for this in case we are asked about it in the future.

Resource persons
I assume you have been liaising with Pak Kheriawan about the need for facilitators - we just wondered who the facilitators were. Perhaps that has not yet been determined by BNPB.

In conclusion, most issues seem clear to me but I remain very concerned about us supporting a training for 74 people. I don't think it is really best practice. Can you provide us with an alternative, two-stage process. If you would like me to call the Kalaksa directly to explain our concerns I am very happy to do so - I do anot want to jeopardize our relationship with the BPBD in Southeast Sulawesi.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Dear TantyThanks for the inputs and explanations. I tried to call but could not get through. I will try again later. Meanwhile, please be assured that we are not trying to stop the training. It is a good idea and very logical. We understand that impacts on your longer term planning. Participant NumbersMy main concern is the number of people involved in training. 74 people is too many for any training in my opinion. As an experienced trainer I think you would agree with me? The participants do not always stay engaged at that number - added to long training days I think you will find it really challenging. So are we agreed that we can split this into 2 training sessions in order to make the training more effective? The timing can be up to you guys. The one or two month was just an example (because of the pusas period). I know this is difficult with puasa coming. So let's see what is possible. I would prefer to pay more for an effective training than to attempt to train such a large group. Perhaps the BPBD can identify the best times and availability of staff. I know this might make them a bit upset if certain decisions have already been made - but please try and we will support as much as possible from here. Training scheduleAs you have been involved in this kind of training before have you found that participants have struggled with 13 hour days? If this is the wish of BPBD to have the long training days and they are aware of the commitment, then I am happy. Perhaps this can be monitored and reviewed during the first phase training? Feedback from participants etc? And maybe changed in the next training?? CostsIt is unusual to hold a live-in, full-board training in the city where all participants come from and this becomes something I need to justify. From a cost-benefit perspective I need to report to MC and USAID on why and live-in training is justified. I assume this step is taken due to the long hours of the training? If yes, then Djoni's question would be the first one asked "why not add extra day/s and reduce the board costs?". This is the obvious devils-advocate question and one I would ask myself when developing my justification. We need a good reason/s for this in case we are asked about it in the future. Resource personsI assume you have been liaising with Pak Kheriawan about the need for facilitators - we just wondered who the facilitators were. Perhaps that has not yet been determined by BNPB. Kesimpulannya, sebagian besar masalah tampaknya jelas bagi saya tapi saya tetap sangat prihatin tentang kami mendukung pelatihan bagi orang-orang 74. Saya tidak berpikir itu adalah praktek yang benar-benar terbaik. Anda dapat memberikan alternatif, dua-tahap proses. Jika Anda ingin saya untuk menelepon Kalaksa langsung untuk menjelaskan keprihatinan saya sangat senang untuk melakukannya - saya lakukan anot ingin membahayakan hubungan kita dengan BPBD di Sulawesi Tenggara.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Sayang Tanty
Terima kasih atas masukan dan penjelasan. Saya mencoba menelepon tapi tidak bisa melewati. Saya akan coba lagi nanti. Sementara itu, yakinlah bahwa kita tidak mencoba untuk menghentikan pelatihan. Ini adalah ide yang baik dan sangat logis. Kami memahami bahwa dampak pada jangka panjang perencanaan. Anda Nomor Peserta perhatian utama saya adalah jumlah orang yang terlibat dalam pelatihan. 74 orang adalah terlalu banyak untuk pelatihan apapun dalam pendapat saya. Sebagai pelatih berpengalaman saya pikir Anda akan setuju dengan saya? Para peserta tidak selalu tetap terlibat di nomor itu - ditambahkan ke hari pelatihan lama saya pikir Anda akan menemukan itu benar-benar menantang. Jadi kita sepakat bahwa kita dapat membagi ini menjadi 2 sesi pelatihan untuk membuat pelatihan lebih efektif? Waktunya bisa sampai kalian. Satu atau dua bulan itu hanya sebuah contoh (karena masa pusas). Saya tahu ini sulit dengan puasa datang. Jadi mari kita lihat apa yang mungkin. Saya lebih suka untuk membayar lebih untuk sebuah pelatihan yang efektif daripada mencoba untuk melatih sebuah kelompok besar. Mungkin BPBD dapat mengidentifikasi waktu terbaik dan ketersediaan staf. Aku tahu ini mungkin membuat mereka agak marah jika keputusan tertentu telah dibuat -. Tapi coba dan kami akan mendukung sebanyak mungkin dari sini Jadwal Pelatihan Seperti yang Anda telah terlibat dalam pelatihan semacam ini sebelum Anda telah menemukan bahwa peserta memiliki berjuang dengan 13 jam hari? Jika ini adalah keinginan dari BPBD untuk memiliki hari-hari pelatihan yang panjang dan mereka menyadari komitmen, maka saya senang. Mungkin ini dapat dipantau dan dikaji selama pelatihan tahap pertama? Umpan balik dari peserta dll? Dan mungkin berubah dalam pelatihan berikutnya ?? Biaya Hal ini biasa untuk mengadakan pelatihan penuh-board live-in di kota di mana semua peserta berasal dari dan ini menjadi sesuatu yang saya butuhkan untuk membenarkan. Dari perspektif biaya-manfaat saya harus melapor ke MC dan USAID mengapa dan hidup-dalam pelatihan dibenarkan. Saya menganggap langkah ini diambil karena berjam-jam pelatihan? Jika ya, maka pertanyaan Djoni akan menjadi yang pertama bertanya "mengapa tidak menambahkan ekstra hari / s dan mengurangi biaya papan?". Ini adalah jelas pertanyaan setan-advokat dan satu saya akan bertanya pada diri sendiri ketika mengembangkan pembenaran saya. Kita perlu alasan yang baik / s untuk ini dalam kasus kita bertanya tentang hal itu di masa depan. Narasumber saya asumsikan Anda telah bekerjasama dengan Pak Kheriawan tentang perlunya fasilitator - kita hanya bertanya-tanya siapa fasilitator yang. Mungkin itu belum ditentukan oleh BNPB. Kesimpulannya, sebagian besar masalah tampaknya jelas bagi saya tapi saya tetap sangat prihatin tentang kami mendukung pelatihan bagi 74 orang. Saya tidak berpikir itu benar-benar praktek terbaik. Dapatkah Anda memberikan kami dengan proses alternatif, dua tahap. Jika Anda ingin saya untuk memanggil Kalaksa langsung untuk menjelaskan keprihatinan kami saya sangat senang melakukannya - saya anot ingin membahayakan hubungan kita dengan BPBD di Sulawesi Tenggara.