An analogy helps to bring out the i

An analogy helps to bring out the intuitive strength of the argument from
testing (cf. Nozick, 1983, 109). Suppose that Jacob, my elder son, takes
his trusty bow and arrow, shoots at a target on the side of a barn, and hits
the bulls-eye. We are impressed and give him a lot of credit. Now Jonah,
my younger son, steps up to a different barn, pulls back his bow and shoots
his arrow. Then he walks up to the side of the barn and paints a bulls-eye
around his arrow. We would give him rather less credit, for archery
anyway. That is the idea behind the argument from testing.
Accommodation is like drawing the bulls-eye afterwards, whereas in
prediction the target is there in advance. This argument seems clearly to
show why successful prediction should count more than accommodation.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Analogi yang membantu untuk membawa keluar kekuatan intuitif argumentasipengujian (rujuk Nozick, 1983, 109). Anggaplah bahwa Yakub, anakku penatua, mengambilterpercaya busur dan panah, menembak pada sasaran di gudang, dan hitslembu-mata. Kami terkesan dan memberinya banyak kredit. Sekarang Yunus,anakku, langkah-langkah ke gudang berbeda, menarik kembali busur dan tunaspanahnya. Kemudian ia berjalan ke sisi gudang dan cat bantengdi sekitar panahnya. Kami akan memberikan dia agak kurang kredit, untuk panahanPokoknya. Itulah ide di balik argumen dari pengujian.Akomodasi adalah seperti gambar lembu-mata setelah itu, sedangkan diPrediksi target ada terlebih dahulu. Argumen ini tampaknya jelasmenunjukkan mengapa sukses prediksi harus menghitung lebih dari akomodasi.