Modern safety legislation places re

Modern safety legislation places responsibility on site developers, contractors and
jack-up owners/operators to identify and manage the risks associated with their equipment and operations, and to demonstrate that they are doing so in a safe and effective manner. This has led to the use of formal risk assessment procedures as the start of the risk management process.

The structure and discipline of the risk assessment technique will vary depending
upon characteristics of the equipment and the complexity of the proposed operation. The assessment may involve a Hazard Identification Study (HAZID), a Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) or any other suitable process that
has been jointly agreed upon and is formally recorded by the parties involved. Comprehensive guidance in the conduct of this process is widely available elsewhere and is not covered in this document. Whatever technique is used, there is a fundamental requirement to understand the particular risks that are specific to the operation of jack-ups.

The purpose of this final section of the guidelines is to identify common hazards
that are specific to the operation of jack-ups. The potential consequences of an encounter with these hazards are listed, together with existing control measures that can be implemented through compliance with the technical guidance contained in the previous sections.

The hazards, potential consequences and existing controls listed in the following
examples for Section 1 of this form of risk assessment are specific to jack-up operations. The list is not exhaustive and should be used only as a guide. Duty holders should develop a complete risk assessment that accounts for all the hazards that are common to all types of vessel and to each task undertaken

In the following tables an incident frequency range from reasonably probable to
remote has been considered, with the consequences in each case listed from serious to reasonably credible, based on actual industry experience.

When considering the additional control measures that should be implemented
it is important to remember that the Health and Safety at Work Act etc. (HSWA) requires that the risk has been reduced to a level that is as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP).

The risk of personal injury has not been specifically addressed at this level,
but such risk is self-evident from inspection of the possible consequences in each case. Every care should be taken to ensure that risk assessments are fully developed to include an assessment of criticality, together with calculation of risk factors and recommendations for additional control measures where necessary

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Undang-undang Keamanan modern menempatkan tanggung jawab pada situs pengembang, kontraktor danJack-up pemilik atau operator untuk mengidentifikasi dan mengelola risiko yang terkait dengan peralatan dan operasi mereka, dan untuk menunjukkan bahwa mereka melakukannya dengan cara yang aman dan efektif. Hal ini menyebabkan penggunaan prosedur penilaian risiko formal sebagai awal dari proses manajemen risiko.Struktur dan disiplin teknik penilaian risiko akan bervariasi tergantungBerdasarkan Karakteristik dari peralatan dan kompleksitas operasi diusulkan. Penilaian mungkin melibatkan identifikasi bahaya yang studi (HAZID), bahaya dan operabilitas studi (HAZOP) atau apapun lainnya sesuai proses yangtelah bersama-sama disepakati dan dicatat secara resmi oleh pihak-pihak yang terlibat. Komprehensif bimbingan dalam melakukan proses ini tersedia luas di tempat lain dan tidak tercakup dalam dokumen ini. Teknik apa pun digunakan, ada persyaratan mendasar untuk memahami risiko tertentu yang ditujukan khusus untuk pengoperasian jack-up.Tujuan dari bagian akhir dari pedoman adalah untuk mengidentifikasi bahaya Umumkhusus untuk pengoperasian jack-up. Konsekuensi potensial dari sebuah pertemuan dengan bahaya ini tercantum, bersama-sama dengan langkah-langkah pengendalian yang ada yang dapat diimplementasikan melalui kepatuhan dengan bimbingan teknis yang terkandung dalam bagian sebelumnya.Bahaya, konsekuensi potensial dan kontrol yang ada yang tercantum dalam berikutexamples for Section 1 of this form of risk assessment are specific to jack-up operations. The list is not exhaustive and should be used only as a guide. Duty holders should develop a complete risk assessment that accounts for all the hazards that are common to all types of vessel and to each task undertakenIn the following tables an incident frequency range from reasonably probable toremote has been considered, with the consequences in each case listed from serious to reasonably credible, based on actual industry experience.When considering the additional control measures that should be implementedit is important to remember that the Health and Safety at Work Act etc. (HSWA) requires that the risk has been reduced to a level that is as low as reasonably practicable (ALARP).The risk of personal injury has not been specifically addressed at this level,but such risk is self-evident from inspection of the possible consequences in each case. Every care should be taken to ensure that risk assessments are fully developed to include an assessment of criticality, together with calculation of risk factors and recommendations for additional control measures where necessary