The creation of new institutions for each Security Council mission has the
advantage of flexibility—organizational structure can be arranged to suit each
specific mission. It also has the advantage, from the perspective of member states,
of maximizing state control over the use of military force by minimizing the
operational discretion of the UN bureaucracy in such matters. The proliferation of
mission-specific organizations, however, also has disadvantages. One is resource
inefficiency, in that each new mission has to create its own bureaucratic structure.
Another disadvantage is that each new mission must solicit donations of forces from
member countries, which takes time and is not always as successful as it might be.
A third disadvantage is that it makes coordination both across and within missions
more difficult. Coordination across missions is more difficult because of the institutional
peculiarities of the individual organizations and because there is little in the
way of central bureaucratic capabilities to oversee communication among institutions.
Coordination within missions is made more difficult because the proliferation of
specific institutional structures undermines the orderly development of standardized
procedures and expectations.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
