Each approach ( embedded or detache

Each approach ( embedded or detached ) has general advantages and disadvantages. Embedded training can be superior to detached training in transfer to real – life task (Resnick, 1987). In addition, strategies taught in an embedded setting, such as problem solving taught in science courses, can be applied across domains, something more likely to occur given explicit instruction and practice in application to other domains (Niaz, 1995). On the other hand, the embedded training may suffer from insufficient attention to the learning strategy caused by pursuing it at the same time as content objectives.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Each approach (embedded or apart) has general advantages and disadvantages. Embedded training can excel Regardless of training in transfers to real-life tasks (Resnick, 1987). In addition, the strategies taught in an atmosphere of embedded, such as problem solving taught in science courses, can be applied in all domains, something more Likely to happen given explicit instruction and practice in the application to other domains (Niaz, 1995). On the other hand, embedded training may suffer from a lack of attention on learning strategies that are the caused by the pursuit at the same time as the content destination.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Each approach (embedded or separate) has the general advantages and disadvantages. embedded training may be superior to a separate training transfers to real - life tasks (Resnick, 1987). In addition, the teaching strategies in embedded settings, such as problem solving taught in science courses, can be applied in all domains, something more likely to happen given the explicit instruction and practice in the application to other domains (Niaz, 1995). On the other hand, embedded training may suffer from insufficient attention to learning strategy caused by the pursuit of it at the same time as the content destination.