In Society of the Spectacle Guy Debord (1931/1994) suggests that in so terjemahan - In Society of the Spectacle Guy Debord (1931/1994) suggests that in so Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

In Society of the Spectacle Guy Deb

In Society of the Spectacle Guy Debord (1931/1994) suggests that in societies where modern conditions of production prevail, through the autocratic reign of the market economy, spectacle is more than a collection of images, it is social relations among people, mediated by images. The fact that contemporary 'reality' programming represents an ahistorical and spectacular approach to social life does not mean that class is not present


but it is precisely because class has ideologically shifted on to questions of moral visibility and individuality in political culture that makes it so easy to see. By denigrating the traditions of emotion and sensation8 generated through melodrama on 'reality' television some critics have failed to register precisely the mechanisms by which class is being remade in the present. This is not to say that class is not made by other factors (economic, for
instance) and across other sites (in political rhetoric and policy, as we have seen), rather 'reality' television is one of the sites where its making is made spectacular, reduced to psychologisation and shown to be loaded with moral value.
In a neoliberal society where a person's social worth is demonstrated by
the capacity to self-manage, 'reality' television puts people in situations in which they can be only out of control, making them appear as completely incapable and inadequate; but rather than locating the forces that put them out of control as social, coping becomes instead a test of a person's individual capacity, and is marked on the body, dispositions, the house, the speech, the faeces, etc., through metonymic morality, where each part carries the value of the whole. Responsibility converts each mistake into a fault, which is the philosophical principle for attributing liability. If Williams (2001) is correct to suggest that melodrama carries a nation's moral values more generally, we suggest that 'reality' television is one of the most visible present political forms of generating inequalities in the moral economy of personhood.
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
In Society of the Spectacle Guy Debord (1931/1994) suggests that in societies where modern conditions of production prevail, through the autocratic reign of the market economy, spectacle is more than a collection of images, it is social relations among people, mediated by images. The fact that contemporary 'reality' programming represents an ahistorical and spectacular approach to social life does not mean that class is not present but it is precisely because class has ideologically shifted on to questions of moral visibility and individuality in political culture that makes it so easy to see. By denigrating the traditions of emotion and sensation8 generated through melodrama on 'reality' television some critics have failed to register precisely the mechanisms by which class is being remade in the present. This is not to say that class is not made by other factors (economic, forinstance) and across other sites (in political rhetoric and policy, as we have seen), rather 'reality' television is one of the sites where its making is made spectacular, reduced to psychologisation and shown to be loaded with moral value.In a neoliberal society where a person's social worth is demonstrated bythe capacity to self-manage, 'reality' television puts people in situations in which they can be only out of control, making them appear as completely incapable and inadequate; but rather than locating the forces that put them out of control as social, coping becomes instead a test of a person's individual capacity, and is marked on the body, dispositions, the house, the speech, the faeces, etc., through metonymic morality, where each part carries the value of the whole. Responsibility converts each mistake into a fault, which is the philosophical principle for attributing liability. If Williams (2001) is correct to suggest that melodrama carries a nation's moral values more generally, we suggest that 'reality' television is one of the most visible present political forms of generating inequalities in the moral economy of personhood.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
Dalam Masyarakat dari Spectacle Guy Debord (1931/1994) menunjukkan bahwa dalam masyarakat di mana kondisi modern produksi menang, melalui pemerintahan otokratis ekonomi pasar, tontonan lebih dari koleksi gambar, itu adalah hubungan sosial antara orang-orang, yang dimediasi oleh gambar. Fakta bahwa 'realitas' pemrograman kontemporer merupakan pendekatan ahistoris dan spektakuler untuk kehidupan sosial tidak berarti kelas yang tidak hadir tapi justru karena kelas telah ideologis bergeser ke pertanyaan visibilitas moral dan individualitas dalam budaya politik yang membuatnya begitu mudah untuk melihat. Dengan merendahkan tradisi emosi dan sensation8 dihasilkan melalui melodrama tentang 'realitas' televisi beberapa kritikus telah gagal untuk mendaftar secara tepat mekanisme yang kelas sedang dibuat ulang pada saat ini. Ini bukan untuk mengatakan kelas yang tidak dibuat oleh faktor lain (ekonomi, untuk misalnya) dan di situs lain (dalam retorika politik dan kebijakan, seperti telah kita lihat), bukan 'realitas' televisi adalah salah satu situs di mana pembuatannya adalah dibuat spektakuler, dikurangi menjadi psychologisation dan terbukti sarat dengan nilai moral. Dalam masyarakat neoliberal di mana layak sosial seseorang ditunjukkan oleh kapasitas untuk mengelola sendiri, 'realitas' televisi menempatkan orang dalam situasi di mana mereka dapat hanya dari kontrol, membuat mereka tampil sebagai benar tidak mampu dan tidak memadai; tapi bukannya menemukan kekuatan yang menempatkan mereka di luar kendali sosial, mengatasi menjadi bukan tes kapasitas individu seseorang, dan ditandai pada tubuh, disposisi, rumah, pidato, tinja, dll, melalui moralitas metonymic , di mana setiap bagian membawa nilai keseluruhan. Tanggung Jawab mengkonversi setiap kesalahan dalam kesalahan, yang merupakan prinsip filosofis untuk menghubungkan kewajiban. Jika Williams (2001) adalah benar untuk menunjukkan melodrama yang mengusung nilai-nilai moral bangsa lebih umum, kami sarankan 'realitas' televisi adalah salah satu bentuk politik sekarang yang paling terlihat dari menghasilkan ketidaksetaraan dalam ekonomi moral kepribadian.






Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: