Hasil (
Bahasa Indonesia) 1:
[Salinan]Disalin!
The injury to the sensory and supporting cells is evident following the exposure andthe degeneration or loss of these cells will continue for some time after the exposurehas ceased. As the hair cells degenerate they are replaced by expansion of thesurrounding Deiters’ and pillar supporting cells which form a “phalangeal scar” in thesurface or reticular lamina of the organ of Corti.More recently attention has centred on pathological changes in the lateral wall tissuesof the cochlea as well as the fibrocytes in the spiral limbus, a region medial to thesensory cells of the organ of Corti. There is evidence of swelling and atrophy of thestria vascularis, loss of the fibrocytes within the spiral ligament and the spiral limbus.7, 9 Interestingly, all these structures are involved in the maintenance of the ioniccomposition of the cochlear fluids, particularly endolymph, suggesting some moregeneralised disturbance of ion homeostasis may occur as a consequence of thecochlear injury. Injury to the lateral wall and supporting tissues is now recognised as a more significant cochlear pathology following noise exposure than previouslyrealised.Changes occur in the central auditory nuclei which more likely are secondary to theperipheral injury (eg. Zhang and Kaltenbach10). However, some studies havesuggested that the functional and structural alterations in the central nuclei andauditory cortex may be more extensive than can be expected by the degree ofperipheral injury (eg Ryan et al.11). Cochlear injury and auditory function after noiseexposure may also be modified by further noise exposure in the post-noise period.12Relationship to hearing loss—There is good evidence that cochlear hair cell loss orpermanent stereocilia abnormalities on surviving hair cells are correlated with thepermanent hearing loss. However, there may be some functional change withoutsignificant sensory cell loss, although this may well be correlated with subtle sensorycell injury or other changes in the cochlea, such as to lateral wall tissues and neurons.Recent evidence 8 of continuing neuronal degeneration following noise exposure butin the absence of hair cell loss and changes in auditory thresholds indicates that there may be subtle cochlear injuries that are not manifest as changes in thresholds, a routine clinical test of auditory function.Temporary hearing loss has been shown to be correlated with reversible changes tostereocilia stiffness and swelling of the primary type I afferent neurons 14, and mayalso correlate to structural or molecular changes to the transduction channels (tiplinks). Significant metabolic and molecular changes are also observed in the cochleafollowing acute noise exposures that may represent a responsiveness of the cochlea to noise exposure, and it is not unreasonable to assume that not all the hearing loss is going to be correlated to structural abnormalities. Indeed it is becoming moreapparent that the acute hearing loss may occur without any evidence of overtstructural changes and may thus represent an adaptation to the noise exposure.Mechanisms—There have been substantial advances in our understanding of themechanisms of the cochlear injury following noise exposure. Some injury to the organof Corti, including the more subtle pathologies such as stereocilia fracture and loss,from high intensities and impulse noise exposures is a consequence of direct mechanical damage.However, there is good evidence that the hair cell injury from lower level and chronicexposures has a more metabolic genesis and most likely is due to oxidative stress and the excessive production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and free radicals.6, 16 These free radicals are molecules with an unpaired electron and in excessive amounts interact with other stable molecules, such as proteins, DNA and lipids, to cause cellular damage and degeneration. ROS may include oxygen free radicals, such as superoxide, which may be produced in the cochlea from excessive mitochondrial activity in hair cells and changes in cochlear blood flow (see Henderson et al.6 for more detail). These interact with hair cell molecules to cause cellular degeneration leading to cell loss.There is strong evidence for an increase in various ROS molecules after noiseexposure and treatment of the cochlea with free radical scavengers or antioxidants orblock of oxidative enzymes can reduce the amount of cochlear injury.The neuronal injury is likely the consequence of glutamate excitotoxicity. Glutamateis the main neurotransmitter at the IHC/primary afferent neuron synapse. Excessiverelease of glutamate during noise exposure, possibly coupled with poor clearance ofglutamate in the synaptic region by surrounding supporting cells, leads to prolongedstimulation of the afferent synapse, neuronal swelling and degeneration. This effecton the afferent terminals and the subsequent hearing loss can be blocked by glutamate receptor antagonists 14 (Gordon and Thorne unpublished observations), supporting an excitotoxic mechanism for the neuronal noise-induced injury. Oxidative stress may also be a cause or contributor to the neuronal injury 6.Degeneration of cochlear tissues results from a combination of necrotic and apoptoticprocesses.6, 17 Activation of a variety of apoptotic triggers have been identified incochlear tissues following noise exposure and this may also be a consequence ofincreased intracellular calcium associated with the uptake or release in hair cellsduring the chronic hair cell stimulation.The mechanism of the changes to the stria vascularis, the spiral ligament and spirallimbus have not been established. As these areas are involved in ion homeostasis, the structural and degenerative changes may be a consequence of a metabolically-induced abnormality in ion handling by these tissues. During sound stimulation there is a movement of potassium ions from endolymph, through the hair cells and into theextracellular space. This potassium is removed from the extracellular space by theepithelial supporting cells in the organ of Corti and the fibrocytes of the lateral andmedial wall tissues to be recycled back to the stria vascularis.During noise exposure there may be excessive release of potassium into theextracellular space which may not be removed adequately leading to the oedema anddegeneration observed in these supporting tissues. It is true that the functionalconsequences of the changes in the stria vascularis and fibrocytes are not wellestablished.7 However, the cochlea may cope adequately with this lateral walldegeneration whilst performing in quiet but there may be a more significant effectduring physiological noise exposure if the recycling pathway for potassium and othermetabolites has been impaired by the noise-induced degeneration of these supportingstructures. This has yet to be established.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..