Hasil (
Bahasa Indonesia) 1:
[Salinan]Disalin!
Our learningAs well as making important findings about the homeless experience, this project enabled us todevelop an understanding about how children wanted to participate in research activities, indecision-making, and in service delivery more broadly. These are learnings that we have we havesince shared with community and government agencies and policymakers. Because of thepowerful nature of the direct voice of children’s experiences and insights, a reorientation ofservices and the implementation of a significant training agenda around children’s participationare under way.To engage children in ethical and meaningful ways meant that we needed to invest considerabletime and energy into the project, to constantly reflect on our experiences, and to “check in” withchildren to ensure that we had understood their expressed needs and wishes. This is a biginvestment to do properly, and a method such as this requires the time, resources, and skills thatsome researchers might not have available to them.Working with children also required us to transfer and to hone our skills as youth and socialworkers, particularly with regard to building rapport and promoting a trustworthy relationshipwith the children and their families (who had the power to gate-keep throughout the life of theproject). The need to do so was articulated clearly by the children in the reference group andreiterated by other participants. The question remains in our minds about whether generic orprofessionally specific research training equips researchers adequately to carry out this type ofresearch without also a background in, for example, social work or youth work or furtherspecialist study.Children involved in the study reported that they thought that it was important for children tohave opportunities to talk about their lives. They also reported that they personally placed greatvalue in their involvement in this study. For example, one young girl, who, when asked to takephotos of things were special to her, took a photo of the tape recorder that had just been used torecord her interview. When asked why she had done so, she responded that the tape recorder wasspecial because “it has my words on it.” She reported that her story was valuable, as was theopportunity to share it.In 1996 Mahon and colleagues argued that “it is neither theoretically nor methodologicallyappropriate to rely on proxies to represent the views and experiences of children. On the contrary,children’s views can and ought to be taken seriously” (p. 146). In this study it became quiteapparent how valuable it is to not only engage children about issues that affect their lives but alsoabout how best to engage children about the issues that affect their lives (Figure 5).Children in this project stressed the importance of relationship building, arguing that researcherswho connected with children and made them feel comfortable, safe, and valued were better thanthose who did not. Although they did not couch these discussions in terms of methodologicalvalidity, they did believe that research would be more credible because children could actuallytalk about things that were important to them without fear or discomfort.Children also stressed the importance of having rights and that, in most cases, they appreciatedlearning about them. They talked about the value of children’s having choices and some controlover the process, and how small demonstrations (such as being allowed to switch the taperecorder off) help children realize that their rights were real. They also asserted that researchersshould “stick to” their commitments and recognize it when they failed to do so.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..