Vol. 27, 2009, Special Issue 2: S2-75–S2-81 Czech J. Food Sci.(bp)5002 terjemahan - Vol. 27, 2009, Special Issue 2: S2-75–S2-81 Czech J. Food Sci.(bp)5002 Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

Vol. 27, 2009, Special Issue 2: S2-

Vol. 27, 2009, Special Issue 2: S2-75–S2-81 Czech J. Food Sci.





(bp)

500

200

162

100

Figure 7. Amplification of CaMV 35S promoter (162 bp). Line contents: M – HindIII DNA ladder (Fermentas, Canada); 1 – ≥ 0.03% positive control (BF410a); 2 – 0.1% positive control (BF410b); 3 – 1% positive control (BF410d); 4 – pa-paya flesh (isolation A); 5 – papaya flesh (isolation B); 6 – papaya stone (isolation A); 7 – papaya stone (isolation B); 8 – extraction control; 9 – MasterMix control




(bp)

500

200

162

100


Figure 8. Amplification of CaMV 35S promoter (162 bp). Line contents: M – HindIII DNA ladder (Fermentas, Can-ada); 1 – ≥ 0.03% positive control (BF410a); 2 – 0.1% po-sitive control (BF410b); 3 – 1% positive control (BF410d); 4 – candied papaya (isolation A); 5 – candied papaya (iso-lation B); 6 – extraction control; 7 – MasterMix control


result as an appropriate control, no 35S CaMV promoter sequence was detected in any assayed papaya material (Figures 7 and 8).


CONCLUSIONS

We verified and applied suitable protocol for DNA isolation from fresh papaya fruit and opti-mised the protocol for amplificable DNA isolation from candied fruits. The procedures can be suc-cessfully used for control purposes and monitoring of papaya import. No GM papaya fruits fresh or candied was found on the market.


References

Anonymous (2003): EC Regulation 1829/2003: on ge-netically modified (GM) food and feed. Available at http://europa.eu/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_268/ l_26820031018en00010023.pdf (accessed 7. 9. 2009).


Anklam E., Gadani F., Heinze P., Pijnenburg H., Van Den Eede G. (2002): Analytical methods for detection and determination of genetically modified organisms in agricultural crops and plant-derived food products. European Food Research and Technology, 214: 3–26.

AgBios GM Database: Available at www.agbios.com (accessed 7. 9. 2009).

Busch U., Pecoraro S., Posthoff K. (2004): Estendorfer-Rinner S First time detection of a genetically modified papaya in Europe – Official complaint of a non author-ized genetically modified organism within the EU Source. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau, 100: 377–380.

Bustin S.A. (2000): Asolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, 25: 169–193.

Chapela M.J., Sotelo C.G., Pérez-Martín R.I., Par-do M.A., Pérez-Villareal B., Gilardi P., Riese J. (2007): Comparison of DNA extraction methods from muscle of canned tuna for species identification. Food Control, 18: 1211–1215.

Demeke T., Ratnayaka I., Phan A. (2009): Effects of DNA extraction and purification methods on real-time quantitative PCR analysis of Roundup Ready soybean. Journal of AOAC International, 92: 1136–1144.

EN ISO 21571:2002: Foodstuffs – Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products – Nucleic acid extraction.

Fitch M.M., Manshardt R.M., Gonsalves D., Slightom J.L., Sanford J.C. (1990): Stable transfor-mation of papaya via microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Reports, 9: 189–194.

Fitch M.M., Manshardt R .M., Gonsalves D., Slightom J.L., Sanford J.C. (1992): Virus resistant papaya derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus. Bio/Technology, 10: 1466–1472.


0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
Vol. 27, 2009, Special Issue 2: S2-75–S2-81 Czech J. Food Sci.(bp)500200162100Figure 7. Amplification of CaMV 35S promoter (162 bp). Line contents: M – HindIII DNA ladder (Fermentas, Canada); 1 – ≥ 0.03% positive control (BF410a); 2 – 0.1% positive control (BF410b); 3 – 1% positive control (BF410d); 4 – pa-paya flesh (isolation A); 5 – papaya flesh (isolation B); 6 – papaya stone (isolation A); 7 – papaya stone (isolation B); 8 – extraction control; 9 – MasterMix control (bp)500200162100Figure 8. Amplification of CaMV 35S promoter (162 bp). Line contents: M – HindIII DNA ladder (Fermentas, Can-ada); 1 – ≥ 0.03% positive control (BF410a); 2 – 0.1% po-sitive control (BF410b); 3 – 1% positive control (BF410d); 4 – candied papaya (isolation A); 5 – candied papaya (iso-lation B); 6 – extraction control; 7 – MasterMix controlresult as an appropriate control, no 35S CaMV promoter sequence was detected in any assayed papaya material (Figures 7 and 8).CONCLUSIONSWe verified and applied suitable protocol for DNA isolation from fresh papaya fruit and opti-mised the protocol for amplificable DNA isolation from candied fruits. The procedures can be suc-cessfully used for control purposes and monitoring of papaya import. No GM papaya fruits fresh or candied was found on the market.ReferencesAnonymous (2003): EC Regulation 1829/2003: on ge-netically modified (GM) food and feed. Available at http://europa.eu/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2003/l_268/ l_26820031018en00010023.pdf (accessed 7. 9. 2009). Anklam E., Gadani F., Heinze P., Pijnenburg H., Van Den Eede G. (2002): Analytical methods for detection and determination of genetically modified organisms in agricultural crops and plant-derived food products. European Food Research and Technology, 214: 3–26.AgBios GM Database: Available at www.agbios.com (accessed 7. 9. 2009).Busch U., Pecoraro S., Posthoff K. (2004): Estendorfer-Rinner S First time detection of a genetically modified papaya in Europe – Official complaint of a non author-ized genetically modified organism within the EU Source. Deutsche Lebensmittel-Rundschau, 100: 377–380.Bustin S.A. (2000): Asolute quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, 25: 169–193.Chapela M.J., Sotelo C.G., Pérez-Martín R.I., Par-do M.A., Pérez-Villareal B., Gilardi P., Riese J. (2007): Comparison of DNA extraction methods from muscle of canned tuna for species identification. Food Control, 18: 1211–1215.Demeke T., Ratnayaka I., Phan A. (2009): Effects of DNA extraction and purification methods on real-time quantitative PCR analysis of Roundup Ready soybean. Journal of AOAC International, 92: 1136–1144.EN ISO 21571:2002: Foodstuffs – Methods of analysis for the detection of genetically modified organisms and derived products – Nucleic acid extraction.Fitch M.M., Manshardt R.M., Gonsalves D., Slightom J.L., Sanford J.C. (1990): Stable transfor-mation of papaya via microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Reports, 9: 189–194.Fitch M.M., Manshardt R .M., Gonsalves D., Slightom J.L., Sanford J.C. (1992): Virus resistant papaya derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus. Bio/Technology, 10: 1466–1472.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: