Moreover, the construct validityof

Moreover, the construct validity
of the SIRS criteria can be empirically assessed
by testing whether the cutoff value of two
criteria represents a significant transitional increase
in the risk of death to logically justify its
choice (in preference to one or three or four
criteria) to diagnose or define severe sepsis.
We hypothesized that in the first 24 hours
after ICU admission, the presence of symptoms
meeting two or more SIRS criteria would have
low face and construct validity and sensitivity
and that the fulfillment of two criteria would
not identify a transitional increase in an otherwise
linear increased risk of death that would be
logically expected with each additional criterion.
We tested these hypotheses by conducting a
study of all ICU admissions in Australia and
New Zealand over the past 14 years.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Selain itu, validitas membangundari Bapak kriteria dapat secara empiris dinilaidengan menguji apakah nilai cutoff duakriteria mewakili peningkatan transisidalam risiko kematian untuk membenarkan logis yangpilihan (dalam preferensi satu atau tiga atau empatkriteria) untuk mendiagnosa atau menetapkan sepsis berat.Kami hipotesis bahwa dalam 24 jam pertamaSetelah masuk ICU, adanya gejalapertemuan dua atau lebih Bapak kriteria akan memilikirendah wajah dan membangun validitas dan sensitivitasdan bahwa pemenuhan dua kriteria akanmengidentifikasi kenaikan transisi dalam hal lainLinear peningkatan risiko kematian yang akanLogis diharapkan dengan setiap kriteria tambahan.Kami menguji hipotesis ini dengan melakukanStudi dari semua penerimaan ICU di Australia danSelandia Baru selama 14 tahun.