Cost–benefit analysis is a rationale for conduct. If the conduct in qu terjemahan - Cost–benefit analysis is a rationale for conduct. If the conduct in qu Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

Cost–benefit analysis is a rational

Cost–benefit analysis is a rationale for conduct. If the conduct in question
is the practice of cost–benefit analysis, and if – following the principle of
instrumental rationality – a cost–benefit analysis is performed to provide a
rationale for this practice, what is the result? An instance of a practice is not
a rationale for that practice. This method of grounding a practice calls to mind
another Wittgensteinian metaphor: verifying what is reported in a newspaper by
purchasing a second copy of the same paper. Producing a rationale for cost–
benefit analysis by means of a cost–benefit analysis – the method dictated by
instrumental rationality – is circular. It assumes what it is undertaken to prove,
because it presupposes the rationality of the practice of which it is a case. Thus
utilitarian actors who are systematic confront a dilemma. Either their conduct is
value rational, in which case they obviously cannot act in an instrumentally
rational fashion; or a rationale for their conduct cannot be produced by a cost–
benefit analysis, in which case the same consequence follows. On either premise,
systematic instrumental rationality is impossible.
In order to escape this dilemma, it is necessary to find a basis for
instrumental rationality that is independent of cost–benefit reasoning. In Weber’s
analysis of rational action, there is only one possible basis: value rationality. In the
dilemma of systematic instrumental rationality, therefore, Weber reaches a logical
dead end.8
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
Cost–benefit analysis is a rationale for conduct. If the conduct in questionis the practice of cost–benefit analysis, and if – following the principle ofinstrumental rationality – a cost–benefit analysis is performed to provide arationale for this practice, what is the result? An instance of a practice is nota rationale for that practice. This method of grounding a practice calls to mindanother Wittgensteinian metaphor: verifying what is reported in a newspaper bypurchasing a second copy of the same paper. Producing a rationale for cost–benefit analysis by means of a cost–benefit analysis – the method dictated byinstrumental rationality – is circular. It assumes what it is undertaken to prove,because it presupposes the rationality of the practice of which it is a case. Thusutilitarian actors who are systematic confront a dilemma. Either their conduct isvalue rational, in which case they obviously cannot act in an instrumentallyrational fashion; or a rationale for their conduct cannot be produced by a cost–benefit analysis, in which case the same consequence follows. On either premise,systematic instrumental rationality is impossible.In order to escape this dilemma, it is necessary to find a basis forinstrumental rationality that is independent of cost–benefit reasoning. In Weber’sanalysis of rational action, there is only one possible basis: value rationality. In thedilemma of systematic instrumental rationality, therefore, Weber reaches a logicaldead end.8
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
Analisis biaya-manfaat adalah alasan untuk perilaku. Jika perilaku yang dimaksud
adalah praktek analisis biaya-manfaat, dan jika - mengikuti prinsip
rasionalitas instrumental - analisis biaya-manfaat dilakukan untuk memberikan
alasan untuk praktek ini, apa hasilnya? Sebuah contoh dari praktek tidak
alasan untuk praktek itu. Metode landasan praktek panggilan ke pikiran
metafora Wittgensteinian lain: memverifikasi apa yang dilaporkan dalam surat kabar dengan
membeli salinan kedua dari kertas yang sama. Menghasilkan pemikiran untuk biaya-
analisis manfaat dengan menggunakan analisis biaya-manfaat - metode ditentukan oleh
rasionalitas instrumental - melingkar. Ini mengasumsikan apa yang dilakukan untuk membuktikan,
karena mengandaikan rasionalitas praktek yang merupakan kasus. Dengan demikian
pelaku utilitarian yang adu sistematis dilema. Entah perilaku mereka adalah
nilai rasional, dalam kasus yang mereka jelas tidak dapat bertindak dalam instrumental
mode rasional; atau alasan untuk perilaku mereka tidak dapat diproduksi oleh biaya-
analisis manfaat, dalam hal konsekuensi yang sama berikut. Di kedua premis,
sistematis rasionalitas instrumental adalah mustahil.
Dalam rangka untuk melarikan diri dilema ini, perlu untuk menemukan dasar untuk
rasionalitas instrumental yang independen penalaran biaya-manfaat. Dalam Weber
analisis tindakan rasional, hanya ada satu kemungkinan dasar: nilai rasionalitas. Dalam
dilema rasionalitas instrumental yang sistematis, oleh karena itu, Weber mencapai logis
end.8 mati
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: