Language Skills There is a logical

Language Skills
There is a logical consensus with regard to the positive relationship between language skills and international assignee adjustment (e.g., Abe & Wiseman, 1983; Church, 1982; Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). There is some disagreement, however, to the relative importance of language compared to other factors, such as personality characteristics (e.g., Benson, 1978; Cui & van den Berg, 1991; Dinges, 1983). The disagreement in the importance of language skills has its roots in whether interpersonal contact between people from different cultures leads to increased cultural understanding. Those who support contact theory believe that language skills, given that they are necessary for communication, are critical for cross-cultural adjustment. Others (e.g., Cui & Van den Berg, 1991) suggest that merely interacting with host nationals is not enough to produce cross-cultural adjustment. They suggest that cross-cultural adjustment only occurs when international assignees have the cultural empathy to be open to different norms and fully acceptant of their host cultures (Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). In other words, one could both speak the host language fluently and know the "correct" behaviors to display, and yet only superficially be immersed in the host culture (Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). Since it would be difficult for the opposite to be true (i.e., that one could be immersed in a culture without language skills), basic language skills should, at very least, be a minimum precondition for success as an international assignee. At a minimum, in most circumstances an attempt should be made to find a qualified candidate with language skills – while for some positions the language skills may be more critical than with others.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Keterampilan bahasa There is a logical consensus with regard to the positive relationship between language skills and international assignee adjustment (e.g., Abe & Wiseman, 1983; Church, 1982; Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). There is some disagreement, however, to the relative importance of language compared to other factors, such as personality characteristics (e.g., Benson, 1978; Cui & van den Berg, 1991; Dinges, 1983). The disagreement in the importance of language skills has its roots in whether interpersonal contact between people from different cultures leads to increased cultural understanding. Those who support contact theory believe that language skills, given that they are necessary for communication, are critical for cross-cultural adjustment. Others (e.g., Cui & Van den Berg, 1991) suggest that merely interacting with host nationals is not enough to produce cross-cultural adjustment. They suggest that cross-cultural adjustment only occurs when international assignees have the cultural empathy to be open to different norms and fully acceptant of their host cultures (Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). In other words, one could both speak the host language fluently and know the "correct" behaviors to display, and yet only superficially be immersed in the host culture (Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). Since it would be difficult for the opposite to be true (i.e., that one could be immersed in a culture without language skills), basic language skills should, at very least, be a minimum precondition for success as an international assignee. At a minimum, in most circumstances an attempt should be made to find a qualified candidate with language skills – while for some positions the language skills may be more critical than with others.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Keterampilan Bahasa
Ada konsensus logis berkaitan dengan hubungan positif antara kemampuan bahasa dan penyesuaian pengalihan internasional (misalnya, Abe & Wiseman, 1983; Gereja, 1982; Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). Ada beberapa ketidaksepakatan, namun, untuk kepentingan relatif dari bahasa dibandingkan dengan faktor-faktor lain, seperti karakteristik kepribadian (misalnya, Benson, 1978; Cui & van den Berg, 1991; Dinges, 1983). Ketidaksepakatan di pentingnya kemampuan bahasa berakar pada apakah kontak interpersonal antara orang-orang dari budaya yang berbeda menyebabkan peningkatan pemahaman budaya. Mereka yang mendukung teori kontak percaya bahwa kemampuan berbahasa, mengingat bahwa mereka diperlukan untuk komunikasi, sangat penting untuk penyesuaian lintas budaya. Lain (misalnya, Cui & Van den Berg, 1991) menunjukkan bahwa hanya berinteraksi dengan warga tuan rumah tidak cukup untuk menghasilkan penyesuaian lintas budaya. Mereka berpendapat bahwa penyesuaian lintas budaya hanya terjadi ketika assignees internasional memiliki empati budaya terbuka dengan norma-norma yang berbeda dan sepenuhnya acceptant budaya tuan rumah mereka (Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). Dengan kata lain, orang bisa berdua berbicara bahasa tuan lancar dan tahu yang "benar" perilaku untuk menampilkan, namun hanya dangkal akan tenggelam dalam budaya tuan rumah (Cui & Van den Berg, 1991). Karena akan sulit bagi lawan untuk benar (yaitu, satu yang bisa tenggelam dalam budaya tanpa kemampuan bahasa), kemampuan bahasa dasar harus, paling tidak, menjadi prasyarat minimum untuk sukses sebagai penerima hak internasional. Minimal, dalam sebagian besar keadaan upaya harus dilakukan untuk menemukan calon yang memenuhi syarat dengan keterampilan bahasa - sedangkan untuk beberapa posisi kemampuan bahasa mungkin lebih penting daripada dengan orang lain.