The approach emphasizing an increasing subtilization of management dis terjemahan - The approach emphasizing an increasing subtilization of management dis Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

The approach emphasizing an increas

The approach emphasizing an increasing subtilization of management discourse on labor force control does not receive total support. While it is certain that, if we compare the postbureaucratic model of the new paradigm of management with Taylorism, such subtilization does exist, this process must be subject to some qualifications. In the nineteenth century, the discourse of authors like Owen and Montgomery presented clear elements of normative control, something that does not seem to be in consonance with the hypothesis of coercive control as the dominant form of the period. Besudes, the managerial ideologies that did not legitimize the social order of the time advocated the creation of exemplary communities to increase economic productivity. The fact that these were socialist attempts does not invalidate their relevance from the standpoint of administrative experimentation. The ideology of industrial betterment, which enjoyed wide diffusion at its time, also displayed a normative and subtle view of workforce control. Moreover, when we compare the discourse of the human relations ideology with systematic rationalism, its successor as a dominant ideology, it is difficult to ascertain whether the ineluctable tendency towards a refinement of control methods existed or if, in reality, a return to an earlier form of control (rational control) actually accurred. These reservations notwithstanding, this approach does not lack plausibility.
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
Pendekatan yang menekankan subtilization peningkatan manajemen wacana tentang tenaga kerja kekuatan kontrol tidak menerima dukungan total. Sementara itu tertentu bahwa, jika kita membandingkan model postbureaucratic paradigma baru manajemen dengan Taylorism, subtilization seperti itu memang ada, proses ini harus tunduk pada beberapa kualifikasi. Pada abad kesembilan belas, wacana penulis seperti Owen dan Montgomery disajikan jelas elemen kontrol normatif, sesuatu yang tampaknya tidak berada dalam harmoni dengan hipotesis koersif kontrol sebagai bentuk dominan periode. Besudes, ideologi manajerial yang tidak melegitimasi tatanan waktu menganjurkan penciptaan teladan masyarakat untuk meningkatkan produktivitas ekonomi. Fakta bahwa ini adalah upaya sosialis tidak membatalkan relevansi dari sudut pandang administrasi eksperimen. Ideologi kemajuan industri, yang menikmati berbagai difusi pada waktunya, juga ditampilkan pandangan normatif dan halus kontrol tenaga kerja. Selain itu, ketika kita membandingkan wacana ideologi hubungan manusia dengan sistematis rasionalisme, penggantinya sebagai ideologi yang dominan, sangat sulit untuk memastikan apakah ada kecenderungan ineluctable ke arah perbaikan dari metode pengendalian atau jika, pada kenyataannya, kembali ke bentuk sebelumnya kontrol (rasional kontrol) benar-benar accurred. Reservasi ini sekalipun, pendekatan ini tidak kekurangan masuk akal.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
The approach emphasizing an increasing subtilization of management discourse on labor force control does not receive total support. While it is certain that, if we compare the postbureaucratic model of the new paradigm of management with Taylorism, such subtilization does exist, this process must be subject to some qualifications. In the nineteenth century, the discourse of authors like Owen and Montgomery presented clear elements of normative control, something that does not seem to be in consonance with the hypothesis of coercive control as the dominant form of the period. Besudes, the managerial ideologies that did not legitimize the social order of the time advocated the creation of exemplary communities to increase economic productivity. The fact that these were socialist attempts does not invalidate their relevance from the standpoint of administrative experimentation. The ideology of industrial betterment, which enjoyed wide diffusion at its time, also displayed a normative and subtle view of workforce control. Moreover, when we compare the discourse of the human relations ideology with systematic rationalism, its successor as a dominant ideology, it is difficult to ascertain whether the ineluctable tendency towards a refinement of control methods existed or if, in reality, a return to an earlier form of control (rational control) actually accurred. These reservations notwithstanding, this approach does not lack plausibility.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: