Santhanam et al. found a significant difference in learning achievemen terjemahan - Santhanam et al. found a significant difference in learning achievemen Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

Santhanam et al. found a significan

Santhanam et al. found a significant difference in learning achievement for the group that received pretraining and midpoint scripts with SRL information.
Schober, Spiel, Reimann, and Wagner (2008) evaluated the effects of online modules designed to
prompt university students in a psychology course to learn more effectively by completing different tasks. The modules were based in SRL principles and structured according to the phases of activation, action, and reflection from Zimmerman (2000). Upon logging in to a module, students in the intervention group were provided with a description of the module and a question that activated prior knowledge of the subject. Students in the control group did not receive the online modules. Goals specifying the learning objectives of the module were provided followed by any projects that needed to be accomplished. A project deliverable checklist was provided for the group project. The instructor, group members, and peer groups gave group specific feedback about the project deliverables. Self-tests allowed students to individually monitor their understanding of the concepts during the module. The module culminated with students reflecting on their ability to plan, organize, and complete projects individually and in groups. Academic achievement was measured on three different levels by means of recall, comprehension, and production. Students in the intervention group achieved better results in completing more complex “comprehension” and productive “production” items.
Shen, Lee, & Tsai (2007) randomly assigned college freshmen in a web-enabled computer software
applications course to one of four groups: (a) SRL with problem-based learning; (b) SRL only; c) problem-based learning only; or (d) no SRL or problem-based learning. The SRL groups received a twohour training on how to manage study time and self-regulate their learning. Content of the SRL training was on the following four processes: (a) self-evaluation and monitoring; (b) goal setting and strategy planning; (c) strategy implementation; and (d) monitoring the outcome of the strategy. Students were taught how to apply these four processes to become more self-regulated learners. Additionally, students were required to record their learning behavior on a weekly basis. The problem-based learning (PBL) group received an authentic problem situation along with a web-based multimedia application that helped students construct their own models for problem solving. Student learning outcomes were measured by their skills in using the application software to create graphs and tables with accuracy and artistry. Overall, Shen, et al. (2007) found that the students who received the SRL intervention performed significantly better than students who did not. Likewise, students who received the PBL intervention were also better performers, especially when they received it in combination with the SRL intervention.
Tsai, Shen, and Tsai (2011) explored the effects of providing students with SRL training and webenabled prompts in a college level, blended course in database management. Delivered in the
classroom, the SRL training discussed how students could manage study time and regulate their
learning by implementing four SRL processes: (a) self-evaluation and monitoring; (b) goal setting and strategy planning; (c) strategy implementation; and (d) monitoring of the outcome strategy. Students recorded the data of their learning behaviors in the course website. In the assessment section of the course website, assignment link prompts instructed students to submit by certain due dates and then became unavailable when the time was up. To measure the learning outcomes, students were required to solve simulated problems by designing and building a database for a customer. The results of this study revealed that students’ skills in using database management software were significantly higher when they received SRL training and SRL web-enabled prompts.
Researchers seem to agree that embedding SRL prompts within the course design has a positive effect on student learning. These empirical studies of SRL interventions strongly suggest that there are benefits for students’ academic success when SRL prompts or training are incorporated into the design of e-learning environments. Instructional design, therefore, can play a key role in supporting and expanding the use of SRL interventions in this context. An important practical implication of these studies is that self-regulation could be incorporated into already established standards and models for elearning course design.
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
Santhanam et al. found a significant difference in learning achievement for the group that received pretraining and midpoint scripts with SRL information.Schober, Spiel, Reimann, and Wagner (2008) evaluated the effects of online modules designed toprompt university students in a psychology course to learn more effectively by completing different tasks. The modules were based in SRL principles and structured according to the phases of activation, action, and reflection from Zimmerman (2000). Upon logging in to a module, students in the intervention group were provided with a description of the module and a question that activated prior knowledge of the subject. Students in the control group did not receive the online modules. Goals specifying the learning objectives of the module were provided followed by any projects that needed to be accomplished. A project deliverable checklist was provided for the group project. The instructor, group members, and peer groups gave group specific feedback about the project deliverables. Self-tests allowed students to individually monitor their understanding of the concepts during the module. The module culminated with students reflecting on their ability to plan, organize, and complete projects individually and in groups. Academic achievement was measured on three different levels by means of recall, comprehension, and production. Students in the intervention group achieved better results in completing more complex “comprehension” and productive “production” items. Shen, Lee, & Tsai (2007) randomly assigned college freshmen in a web-enabled computer softwareapplications course to one of four groups: (a) SRL with problem-based learning; (b) SRL only; c) problem-based learning only; or (d) no SRL or problem-based learning. The SRL groups received a twohour training on how to manage study time and self-regulate their learning. Content of the SRL training was on the following four processes: (a) self-evaluation and monitoring; (b) goal setting and strategy planning; (c) strategy implementation; and (d) monitoring the outcome of the strategy. Students were taught how to apply these four processes to become more self-regulated learners. Additionally, students were required to record their learning behavior on a weekly basis. The problem-based learning (PBL) group received an authentic problem situation along with a web-based multimedia application that helped students construct their own models for problem solving. Student learning outcomes were measured by their skills in using the application software to create graphs and tables with accuracy and artistry. Overall, Shen, et al. (2007) found that the students who received the SRL intervention performed significantly better than students who did not. Likewise, students who received the PBL intervention were also better performers, especially when they received it in combination with the SRL intervention.Tsai, Shen, and Tsai (2011) explored the effects of providing students with SRL training and webenabled prompts in a college level, blended course in database management. Delivered in theclassroom, the SRL training discussed how students could manage study time and regulate theirlearning by implementing four SRL processes: (a) self-evaluation and monitoring; (b) goal setting and strategy planning; (c) strategy implementation; and (d) monitoring of the outcome strategy. Students recorded the data of their learning behaviors in the course website. In the assessment section of the course website, assignment link prompts instructed students to submit by certain due dates and then became unavailable when the time was up. To measure the learning outcomes, students were required to solve simulated problems by designing and building a database for a customer. The results of this study revealed that students’ skills in using database management software were significantly higher when they received SRL training and SRL web-enabled prompts.Researchers seem to agree that embedding SRL prompts within the course design has a positive effect on student learning. These empirical studies of SRL interventions strongly suggest that there are benefits for students’ academic success when SRL prompts or training are incorporated into the design of e-learning environments. Instructional design, therefore, can play a key role in supporting and expanding the use of SRL interventions in this context. An important practical implication of these studies is that self-regulation could be incorporated into already established standards and models for elearning course design.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]
Disalin!
Santhanam dkk. menemukan perbedaan yang signifikan dalam prestasi belajar untuk kelompok yang menerima sebelum pelatihan dan skrip titik tengah dengan informasi SRL.
Schober, Spiel, Reimann, dan Wagner (2008) mengevaluasi efek dari modul online yang dirancang untuk
mendorong mahasiswa dalam kursus psikologi belajar lebih efektif dengan menyelesaikan tugas yang berbeda. Modul didasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip SRL dan terstruktur sesuai dengan tahapan aktivasi, tindakan, dan refleksi dari Zimmerman (2000). Setelah masuk ke modul, siswa pada kelompok intervensi diberikan dengan deskripsi modul dan pertanyaan yang diaktifkan pengetahuan tentang subjek. Siswa dalam kelompok kontrol tidak menerima modul online. Tujuan menentukan tujuan pembelajaran dari modul yang tersedia diikuti oleh proyek-proyek yang perlu diselesaikan. Sebuah proyek checklist penyampaian disediakan untuk proyek kelompok. Instruktur, anggota kelompok, dan kelompok sebaya memberikan umpan balik kelompok spesifik tentang deliverable proyek. Self-tes memungkinkan siswa untuk secara individu memantau pemahaman mereka tentang konsep-konsep selama modul. Modul ini memuncak dengan siswa merefleksikan kemampuan mereka untuk merencanakan, mengatur, dan menyelesaikan proyek-proyek individual dan kelompok. Prestasi akademik diukur pada tiga tingkat yang berbeda dengan cara recall, pemahaman, dan produksi. Siswa pada kelompok intervensi mencapai hasil yang lebih baik dalam menyelesaikan lebih kompleks "pemahaman" dan produktif "produksi" item.
Shen, Lee, & Tsai (2007) mahasiswa perguruan tinggi secara acak dalam perangkat lunak komputer web-enabled
saja aplikasi ke salah satu dari empat kelompok: (a) SRL dengan pembelajaran berbasis masalah; (b) SRL saja; c) hanya pembelajaran berbasis masalah; atau (d) tidak ada SRL atau pembelajaran berbasis masalah. Kelompok SRL menerima pelatihan twohour tentang bagaimana mengelola waktu belajar dan mengatur diri belajar mereka. Isi pelatihan SRL berada di empat proses berikut: (a) evaluasi diri dan pemantauan; (b) penetapan tujuan dan perencanaan strategi; (c) implementasi strategi; dan (d) memantau hasil dari strategi. Siswa diajarkan bagaimana menerapkan empat proses ini untuk menjadi pembelajar mandiri lagi. Selain itu, siswa diminta untuk merekam perilaku belajar mereka setiap minggu. Pembelajaran berbasis masalah (PBL) kelompok menerima situasi masalah otentik bersama dengan aplikasi multimedia berbasis web yang membantu siswa membangun model mereka sendiri untuk pemecahan masalah. Hasil belajar siswa diukur oleh kemampuan mereka dalam menggunakan perangkat lunak aplikasi untuk membuat grafik dan tabel dengan akurasi dan kesenian. Secara keseluruhan, Shen, dkk. (2007) menemukan bahwa siswa yang menerima intervensi SRL dilakukan secara signifikan lebih baik daripada siswa yang tidak. Demikian juga, siswa yang menerima intervensi PBL juga pemain yang lebih baik, terutama ketika mereka menerima dalam kombinasi dengan intervensi SRL.
Tsai, Shen, dan Tsai (2011) mengeksplorasi efek menyediakan siswa dengan pelatihan SRL dan webenabled petunjuknya di tingkat perguruan tinggi , dicampur saja di manajemen database. Disampaikan dalam
kelas, pelatihan SRL membahas bagaimana siswa bisa mengelola waktu belajar dan mengatur mereka
belajar dengan menerapkan empat proses SRL: (a) evaluasi diri dan pemantauan; (b) penetapan tujuan dan perencanaan strategi; (c) implementasi strategi; dan (d) pemantauan strategi hasil. Siswa mencatat data perilaku belajar mereka di website saja. Pada bagian penilaian dari situs saja, petunjuknya Link tugas menginstruksikan siswa untuk menyerahkan oleh tanggal jatuh tempo tertentu dan kemudian menjadi tidak tersedia ketika waktu naik. Untuk mengukur hasil belajar, siswa diminta untuk memecahkan masalah simulasi dengan merancang dan membangun database untuk pelanggan. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan bahwa kemampuan siswa dalam menggunakan perangkat lunak manajemen database secara signifikan lebih tinggi ketika mereka menerima pelatihan SRL dan SRL web-enabled petunjuknya.
Para peneliti tampaknya setuju bahwa embedding SRL meminta dalam desain saja memiliki efek positif pada siswa belajar. Studi empiris intervensi SRL sangat menyarankan bahwa ada manfaat untuk keberhasilan akademis siswa ketika petunjuknya SRL atau pelatihan yang dimasukkan ke dalam desain lingkungan e-learning. Desain instruksional, oleh karena itu, dapat memainkan peran kunci dalam mendukung dan memperluas penggunaan intervensi SRL dalam konteks ini. Implikasi praktis yang penting dari studi ini adalah bahwa pengaturan diri dapat dimasukkan ke dalam standar yang sudah mapan dan model untuk elearning desain saja.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2025 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: