Assumptions Borrowing linguistic vo

Assumptions
Borrowing linguistic vocabulary, theory and methods from Saussure and to a smaller degree from Peirce, structuralists believe that codes, signs, and rules govern all human social and cultural practices, including communication. The proper study of meaning and therefore reality is an investigation of the system behind these practices, not individual practices themselves. To discover how all the parts fit together and function is their aim. Structuralist find meaning in the relationship among the various components of a system. They believe that a study of the system of rules that govern literary interpretation becomes the critic’s primary task. Such a belief presupposes that the structure of literature is similar to the structure of language. Literature is a self-enclosed system of rules that is composed of language and literature needs no outside referent but its own rule-governed but socially constrained system. For the structuralist, how a symbol or any other literary device funtions becomes of chief importance, not how literary devices imitate reality or express feeling. In addition to emphasizing the system of literature and not individual texts, structuralism claims to demystify literature. By explaining literature as a system of signs encased in a cultural frame that allows that system to operate, no longer, says structuralism, can a literary work be considered a mystical or magical relationship between author and the reader, the place where author and reader share emotions, ideas and truth. Meaning can be found by analyzing the system of rules that make up literature itself.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Asumsi Borrowing linguistic vocabulary, theory and methods from Saussure and to a smaller degree from Peirce, structuralists believe that codes, signs, and rules govern all human social and cultural practices, including communication. The proper study of meaning and therefore reality is an investigation of the system behind these practices, not individual practices themselves. To discover how all the parts fit together and function is their aim. Structuralist find meaning in the relationship among the various components of a system. They believe that a study of the system of rules that govern literary interpretation becomes the critic’s primary task. Such a belief presupposes that the structure of literature is similar to the structure of language. Literature is a self-enclosed system of rules that is composed of language and literature needs no outside referent but its own rule-governed but socially constrained system. For the structuralist, how a symbol or any other literary device funtions becomes of chief importance, not how literary devices imitate reality or express feeling. In addition to emphasizing the system of literature and not individual texts, structuralism claims to demystify literature. By explaining literature as a system of signs encased in a cultural frame that allows that system to operate, no longer, says structuralism, can a literary work be considered a mystical or magical relationship between author and the reader, the place where author and reader share emotions, ideas and truth. Meaning can be found by analyzing the system of rules that make up literature itself.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Asumsi
Meminjam kosakata bahasa, teori dan metode dari Saussure dan untuk tingkat yang lebih kecil dari Peirce, strukturalis percaya bahwa kode, tanda-tanda, dan peraturan pemerintah semua praktik sosial dan budaya manusia, termasuk komunikasi. Studi yang tepat makna dan karena kenyataannya adalah investigasi dari sistem balik praktek-praktek ini, bukan individual praktek sendiri. Untuk menemukan bagaimana semua bagian cocok bersama-sama dan fungsi tujuan mereka. Strukturalis menemukan makna dalam hubungan antara berbagai komponen dari sistem. Mereka percaya bahwa studi tentang sistem aturan yang mengatur interpretasi sastra menjadi tugas utama kritikus. Keyakinan seperti mengandaikan bahwa struktur sastra mirip dengan struktur bahasa. Sastra adalah sistem self-tertutup aturan yang terdiri dari bahasa dan sastra kebutuhan tidak ada rujukan luar tetapi sistem aturan-diatur tapi terkendala sosial sendiri. Untuk strukturalis, bagaimana simbol atau fungsi di perangkat sastra lainnya menjadi kepala penting, bukan bagaimana perangkat sastra meniru realitas atau perasaan ekspres. Selain menekankan sistem sastra dan tidak teks individu, strukturalisme mengklaim untuk mengungkap sastra. Dengan menjelaskan sastra sebagai sistem tanda terbungkus dalam bingkai budaya yang memungkinkan sistem untuk beroperasi, tidak lagi, kata strukturalisme, dapat karya sastra dianggap hubungan mistis atau magis antara penulis dan pembaca, tempat di mana penulis dan pembaca berbagi emosi, ide-ide dan kebenaran. Yang berarti dapat ditemukan dengan menganalisis sistem aturan yang membentuk sastra itu sendiri.