Each approach ( embedded or detache

Each approach ( embedded or detached ) has general advantages and disadvantages. Embedded training can be superior to detached training in transfer to real – life task (Resnick, 1987). In addition, strategies taught in an embedded setting, such as problem solving taught in science courses, can be applied across domains, something more likely to occur given explicit instruction and practice in application to other domains (Niaz, 1995). On the other hand, the embedded training may suffer from insufficient attention to the learning strategy caused by pursuing it at the same time as content objectives.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

Each approach (embedded or apart) has general advantages and disadvantages. Embedded training can excel regardless of training in transfers to real-life tasks (Resnick, 1987). In addition, the strategies taught in an atmosphere of embedded, such as problem solving taught in science courses, can be applied in all domains, something more likely to happen given explicit instruction and practice in the application to other domains (Niaz, 1995). On the other hand, embedded training may suffer from a lack of attention on learning strategies that are caused by the pursuit at the same time as the content destination.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

Setiap pendekatan (tertanam atau terpisah) memiliki kelebihan umum dan kekurangan. pelatihan tertanam dapat menjadi lebih unggul untuk pelatihan terpisah di transfer ke real - tugas kehidupan (Resnick, 1987). Selain itu, strategi mengajar dalam pengaturan tertanam, seperti pemecahan masalah diajarkan dalam kursus ilmu, dapat diterapkan di seluruh domain, sesuatu yang lebih mungkin untuk terjadi diberikan instruksi yang eksplisit dan praktek di aplikasi untuk domain lainnya (Niaz, 1995). Di sisi lain, pelatihan tertanam mungkin menderita dari cukup perhatian pada strategi pembelajaran yang disebabkan oleh mengejar itu pada waktu yang sama seperti tujuan konten.