OLexemes are related to other lexem

OLexemes are related to other lexemes on various semantic criteria.
Field theory tries to discover sets of lexemes such that members of a
set share some semantic feature(s) and are differentiated from one
another by other systematically distributed features. Sets may be
hierarchical, part-whole, sequential, cyclical, and may form structural
paradigms.
All societies have kinship systems, which can be analyzed in terms
of a few semantic features that co-occur. The features parent, offspring,
sibling and spouse are universal. Older and younger siblings are named
differently in some cultures. Gender figures differently in different systems,
so that relations on the mother’s side may have different names than
those on the father’s side, and similarly for the bride’s family as distinct
from the bridegroom’s family. Logical entailments, paraphrases, and
contradictions derive from conjunctions, negative ‘not,’ and quantifier
pronouns like ‘no one’ and ‘someone.’ Meaning relations of this sort
are used to make inferences.
Truth conditional semantics investigates the relations among
lexemes that can be predicates for the same referring expression.
Two such predicates may be related to each other as synonyms, as
hyponym and superordinate, or as antonyms. Among antonyms we
L E X I C A L R E L A T I O N S
113
distinguish binary and non-binary antonyms; non-binary antonyms
are opposite ends of a scale along which intermediate degrees exist;
for binary antonyms there are no intermediate degrees. For any pair
of sentences in which the predicates are synonymous, antonymous,
or related as hyponym-superordinate a truth table can be established,
setting out what can be known about one sentence if the other is
known to be true or to be false.
Two predicates are converse antonyms if each links noun phrases
in the roles of theme and associate, the noun phrases occur in reverse
roles with the two predicates, and the resulting sentences have the
same truth value. A symmetrical predicate also links noun phrases
in the roles of theme and associate; the noun phrases may be reversed
without changing the truth of the predication.
Quantifiers such as all, some, no can be understood and explained
by comparing sentences in which a superordinate term and a hyponym
are contrasted in subject position and in object position.
Suggested reading
For lexical analyses within the framework of field theory see, in
addition to the works mentioned in section 5.1, Nida (1975) and
(1979).
Cruse (1986) contains the most extensive exploration of lexical
relations published to date. Recommended chapters are: 6, Taxonomies;
7, Meronomies; 9, Opposites I: complementaries and antonyms;
10, Opposites II: directional opposites; 11, Opposites III: general
questions; 12, Synonymy.
A more thorough analysis of lexical relations than that presented
here is Lyons (1977), Chapter 9.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

OLexemes yang berhubungan dengan lain lexemes pada berbagai kriteria semantik.Teori medan berusaha menemukan set lexemes seperti bahwa anggotaberbagi beberapa semantik feature(s) dan dibedakan dari satulain dengan fitur yang sistematis didistribusikan. Set mungkinhierarki, Bagian-seluruh, berurutan, siklus, dan mungkin bentuk strukturalparadigma.Semua masyarakat memiliki sistem kekerabatan, yang dapat dianalisis dalam istilahBeberapa fitur semantik yang turut terjadi. Fitur orangtua, keturunan,saudara kandung dan pasangan bersifat universal. Diberi nama saudara-saudara yang lebih tua dan lebih mudaberbeda dalam beberapa budaya. Tokoh-tokoh gender berbeda dalam sistem yang berbeda,sehingga hubungan sisi ibu mungkin memiliki nama yang berbeda daripadaorang-orang di sisi ayahnya, dan juga untuk keluarga pengantin perempuan sebagai berbedadari keluarga mempelai pria. Logis entailments, sedekat, dankontradiksi berasal dari kata sambung, negatif 'tidak' dan quantifierkata ganti seperti 'tidak ada satu' dan 'seseorang'. Berarti hubungan semacam inidigunakan untuk membuat kesimpulan.Kebenaran bersyarat semantik menyelidiki hubungan antaralexemes yang dapat predikat untuk ekspresi pengarah yang sama.Dua predikat tersebut mungkin terkait satu sama lain sebagai sinonim, sebagaihyponym dan superordinate, atau sebagai Antonim. Antara Antonim kamiL E X I C A R E L L T SAYA O N S113membedakan biner dan non-biner Antonim; Antonim non-binerdi seberang ujung skala sepanjang yang menengah derajat ada;for binary antonyms there are no intermediate degrees. For any pairof sentences in which the predicates are synonymous, antonymous,or related as hyponym-superordinate a truth table can be established,setting out what can be known about one sentence if the other isknown to be true or to be false.Two predicates are converse antonyms if each links noun phrasesin the roles of theme and associate, the noun phrases occur in reverseroles with the two predicates, and the resulting sentences have thesame truth value. A symmetrical predicate also links noun phrasesin the roles of theme and associate; the noun phrases may be reversedwithout changing the truth of the predication.Quantifiers such as all, some, no can be understood and explainedby comparing sentences in which a superordinate term and a hyponymare contrasted in subject position and in object position.Suggested readingFor lexical analyses within the framework of field theory see, inaddition to the works mentioned in section 5.1, Nida (1975) and(1979).Cruse (1986) contains the most extensive exploration of lexicalrelations published to date. Recommended chapters are: 6, Taxonomies;7, Meronomies; 9, Opposites I: complementaries and antonyms;10, Opposites II: directional opposites; 11, Opposites III: generalquestions; 12, Synonymy.A more thorough analysis of lexical relations than that presentedhere is Lyons (1977), Chapter 9.