4.2.2. Scientific Panel ValuationTh

4.2.2. Scientific Panel Valuation
The most valued ecosystem service by the scientific panel was
“provision of quality food”, followed by “maintenance of landraces”,
“heritage value of home gardens and associated traditional ecological
knowledge”, and “place for creating and enhancing social networks”.
All those services received an average value from 4.5 to 4.67 by the
scientific panel (Table 2, Column B). The first three of the above
services were also the most valued services among stakeholders.
The ecosystem services less valued by the scientific panel were
“flood prevention” and “enhanced water quality”, which obtained
an average value of 1.5, followed by “prevention/buffering of pests
and diseases”. So, the three ecosystem services less valued by the sci￾entific panel also correspond with the ecosystem services less valued
by the stakeholders. Results of the power correlation analysis showed
a great similarity (0.9987, pb0.01) between the stakeholders’ and the
scientists’ sets of responses.
Results regarding the relative importance of each group of ecosys￾tem services show that scientists, as stakeholders, confer larger value
to home gardens cultural (0.78), habitat/support (0.73), and produc￾tion (0.68) services than to regulating services (0.43).

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

4.2.2. Panel ilmiah penilaianLayanan ekosistem yang paling berharga oleh panel ilmiah"penyediaan makanan berkualitas", diikuti oleh "pemeliharaan landraces","warisan nilai rumah kebun dan terkait tradisional ekologipengetahuan", dan"tempat untuk menciptakan dan meningkatkan jaringan sosial".Semua layanan tersebut menerima nilai rata-rata dari 4,5 4,67 olehpanel ilmiah (Tabel 2, kolom B). Tiga di atasLayanan juga adalah layanan yang paling berharga antara para pemegang peran.Layanan ekosistem yang kurang dihargai oleh panel ilmiah"pencegahan banjir" dan "manfaat air kualitas", yang diperolehnilai rata-rata 1.5, diikuti oleh "pencegahan/buffering hamadan penyakit". Jadi, tiga ekosistem kurang dihargai oleh sci entific panel juga sesuai dengan jasa ekosistem kurang dihargaioleh para pemangku kepentingan. Hasil analisis korelasi kekuatan menunjukkankemiripan yang besar (0.9987, pb0.01) antara para pemegang peran danilmuwan set tanggapan.Hasil mengenai pentingnya relatif setiap kelompok menimbulkan tem Layanan menunjukkan bahwa ilmuwan, sebagai pemangku kepentingan, memberikan nilai yang lebih besaruntuk Taman Rumah Budaya (0.78), habitat/dukungan (0,73), dan layanan produc tion (0,68) daripada untuk mengatur layanan (0,43).