This review of the evidence for early agriculture in New Guinea suppor terjemahan - This review of the evidence for early agriculture in New Guinea suppor Bahasa Indonesia Bagaimana mengatakan

This review of the evidence for ear

This review of the evidence for early agriculture in New Guinea supported by new data from Kuk Swamp demonstrates that cultivation had begun there by at least 6950-6440 cal BP and probably much earlier. Contrary to previous ideas, the first farming in New Guinea was not owed to South-East Asia, but emerged independently in the Highlands. Indeed plants such as the banana were probably first domesticated in New Guinea and later diffused into the Asian continent.
Recent multi-disciplinary investigation shavefilledoutprevious,largelyspeculative
chronologiesofprehistoricplaneexploitation(Harri s1995)andconfirmprevious
interpretationsthatagriculturearoseindependentlyinNewGuinea(Table3).NewmultidisciplinaryinvestigationsatKukhaveadvancedpreviousinterpretationsofprehistoricplant
exploitationintheHighlandsofNewGuineaintwosignificantways.
First,multi-disciplinarylinesofevidence(includingarchaeological,archaeobotanical,
palaeoecologicalandstratigraphic)showthatagriculturewaspracticedintheUpperWahgi
Valleybyatleast6950-6440calBPandprobablymuchearlier.Theevidenceforearlierplant
exploitationpracticesatKuki sinsufficientrobedefinitiveofagriculture,aspreviouslyclaimed
(Golson1977a:613-5,1991a;Golson&Hughes1980;Hope&GoLson1995:824).The
timingoftheemergenceofagricultureintheHighlandso fNewGuinearequiresclarification
throughgreaterinterpretativeresolutionofthePhase1recordatKukandtheexcavationof
additionalsiteswithevidenceofearlyHoloceneplantexploitation.
Second,agriculturemayhaveemergedintheHighlandsofNewGuineaasopposedtothe
lowlands.Golsonsuggestedthatagricultureoriginatedinrhelowlandsandspreadwiih
expandingpopulationsintotheHighlandsasclimatesamelioratedatthebeginningofthe
Holocene(Golson1991b:88-9;Hope&Golson1995:827-8).Iti sarguedherethat
agricultureemergedfrombroad-spectrumplantexploitationpracticesintheHighlandswhich
hadenabledpermanentoccupationoftheinteriorduringtheLarePleistocene.Glimatic
(LatePleistocene)andenvironmental(earlytomid-Holocene)forcingofexistingplant
exploitationpracticesledrorhedeveiopmentofmoreinterventionistandextensivestrategies
intheHighlands.Althoughthespecificmechanismsremainuncertain,anincreasingfocus
852
77 mDenham.SimonHaberle&CarolLentfer
onmajorsourcesofstarch,includingColocasiarareandEumusabananas,werecentraltothe
emergenceofagricultureintheHighlands.
Aswirhanearlierdebateconcerningarboriculture(compareKirch1989toSwadlingf frt/.
1991andYe n1996),agricultureinNewGuineawastraditionallyviewedasbeingofSoutheast
Asianorigin(e.g.Sauer1952).Thearchaeological,archaeobotanicalandpalaeoecological
fmdingsatKukcorroboratephytogeographicandgeneticinterpretationsofindependen t
plantdomesticationinMelanesiaanddemonstratethatagricultureemergedinNewGuinea
independentlyofanySouth-eastAsianinfluencebyatleast6950-6440calBP.Indeed,the
earlyHoloceneEumusasectionbananasatKuksolidifypreviousinterpretationsfortheearly
diffusionofdomesticatedplantsfromNewGuineaandtheirsubsequentinfluenceonthe
developmentofagricultureinSoutheastAsia(DeLanghe&deMaret1999:378-82)and
Africa(Mbidaetal.2000,2001).Suchfmdingsopenupnewpossibilitiesforinteraction
betweenmainlandSoutheastAsiaandNewGuineaduringtheearlyandmid-Holocene(i.e.
priorroAuscronesiandispersalintoIndo-MalaysiaandMelanesia)andrequireustorethink
theoriginsandspreadofagricultureinthePacific,SoutheastAsiaandbeyond.
0/5000
Dari: -
Ke: -
Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]
Disalin!
Review ini bukti awal pertanian di New Guinea didukung oleh data baru dari rawa-rawa Kuk menunjukkan bahwa budidaya telah dimulai di sana oleh setidaknya 6950-6440 cal BP dan mungkin banyak sebelumnya. Bertentangan dengan ide-ide sebelumnya, pertanian pertama di New Guinea tidak berutang untuk Asia Tenggara, tetapi muncul secara mandiri di dataran tinggi. Memang tanaman seperti pisang yang mungkin pertama dijinakkan di New Guinea dan kemudian menyebar ke benua Asia.Shavefilledoutprevious Recentmulti-disciplinaryinvestigation, largelyspeculativeandconfirmprevious chronologiesofprehistoricplaneexploitation (Harri s1995)interpretationsthatagriculturearoseindependentlyinNewGuinea(Table3).NewmultidisciplinaryinvestigationsatKukhaveadvancedpreviousinterpretationsofprehistoricplantexploitationintheHighlandsofNewGuineaintwosignificantways.Pertama, multi-disciplinarylinesofevidence(includingarchaeological,archaeobotanical,showthatagriculturewaspracticedintheUpperWahgi palaeoecologicalandstratigraphic)Valleybyatleast6950-6440calBPandprobablymuchearlier.TheevidenceforearlierplantexploitationpracticesatKuki sinsufficientrobedefinitiveofagriculture, aspreviouslyclaimed(Golson1977a:613-5, 1991a;Golson & Hughes1980;Harapan & GoLson1995:824).ThetimingoftheemergenceofagricultureintheHighlandso fNewGuinearequiresclarificationthroughgreaterinterpretativeresolutionofthePhase1recordatKukandtheexcavationofadditionalsiteswithevidenceofearlyHoloceneplantexploitation.Kedua, agriculturemayhaveemergedintheHighlandsofNewGuineaasopposedtothedataran rendah.GolsonsuggestedthatagricultureoriginatedinrhelowlandsandspreadwiihexpandingpopulationsintotheHighlandsasclimatesamelioratedatthebeginningoftheHolosen (Golson1991b:88-9;Harapan & Golson1995:827-8).ITI sarguedherethatagricultureemergedfrombroad-spectrumplantexploitationpracticesintheHighlandswhichhadenabledpermanentoccupationoftheinteriorduringtheLarePleistocene.Glimatic(LatePleistocene) andenvironmental(earlytomid-Holocene) forcingofexistingplantexploitationpracticesledrorhedeveiopmentofmoreinterventionistandextensivestrategiesintheHighlands.Althoughthespecificmechanismsremainuncertain,anincreasingfocus85277 mDenham.SimonHaberle & CarolLentferonmajorsourcesofstarch, includingColocasiarareandEumusabananas, werecentraltotheemergenceofagricultureintheHighlands.Aswirhanearlierdebateconcerningarboriculture (compareKirch1989toSwadlingf frt /.1991andYe n1996), agricultureinNewGuineawastraditionallyviewedasbeingofSoutheastAsianorigin(e.g.Sauer1952).Thearchaeological, archaeobotanicalandpalaeoecologicalfmdingsatKukcorroboratephytogeographicandgeneticinterpretationsofindependen tplantdomesticationinMelanesiaanddemonstratethatagricultureemergedinNewGuineaindependentlyofanySouth-eastAsianinfluencebyatleast6950-6440calBP.Indeed,theearlyHoloceneEumusasectionbananasatKuksolidifypreviousinterpretationsfortheearlydiffusionofdomesticatedplantsfromNewGuineaandtheirsubsequentinfluenceonthedevelopmentofagricultureinSoutheastAsia (DeLanghe & deMaret1999:378-82) danAfrica(Mbidaetal.2000,2001).SuchfmdingsopenupnewpossibilitiesforinteractionbetweenmainlandSoutheastAsiaandNewGuineaduringtheearlyandmid-Holosen (yaituandrequireustorethink priorroAuscronesiandispersalintoIndo-MalaysiaandMelanesia)theoriginsandspreadofagricultureinthePacific, SoutheastAsiaandbeyond.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
 
Bahasa lainnya
Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.

Copyright ©2024 I Love Translation. All reserved.

E-mail: