2. Methodology This is a descriptiv

2. Methodology
This is a descriptive survey designed to collect data from students opinions to measure the quality of infrastructural development in four institutions of higher learning in Faculty of Architecture Planning and Surveying, UiTM Shah Alam. Final year students were randomly selected for the study. Final year students were used because they have been in school long enough to possess enough experience about the environment and therefore had adequate experience to respond intelligently to the checklist. The results are presented in the tables according to the order of the research. Physical assets and facilities development indicators’ checklist and questionnaire physical asset and facilities development quality questionnaire were the instruments used for data collection. It contains 30 parameters based on the physical assets and facilities development quality indicators’ checklist addressing the research questions. Research question Part 1 addresses the stakeholder perspective on physical assets and facilities development as contained in parameter 1 to 7; parameter 8 to 11 supplied answers to research part 2 (core activities process on physical assets and facilities development); part 3 (comfortability physical assets and facilities development) was address with parameter 12 to 15; parameter 16 to 20 focused on research question 4 (the level of maintenance culture in the institutions); parameter 21 to 26 answered research question 5 (global acceptability of the facilities) while parameter 27 to 30 addressed research question 6 (environmental safety and sanitation of the institutions). The expected mean of 2.50 assigned to the grade for agree or disagree was used. Any grade of 2.50 and above was taken to agree with the point while below 2.50 was disagree.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

2. metodologi This is a descriptive survey designed to collect data from students opinions to measure the quality of infrastructural development in four institutions of higher learning in Faculty of Architecture Planning and Surveying, UiTM Shah Alam. Final year students were randomly selected for the study. Final year students were used because they have been in school long enough to possess enough experience about the environment and therefore had adequate experience to respond intelligently to the checklist. The results are presented in the tables according to the order of the research. Physical assets and facilities development indicators’ checklist and questionnaire physical asset and facilities development quality questionnaire were the instruments used for data collection. It contains 30 parameters based on the physical assets and facilities development quality indicators’ checklist addressing the research questions. Research question Part 1 addresses the stakeholder perspective on physical assets and facilities development as contained in parameter 1 to 7; parameter 8 to 11 supplied answers to research part 2 (core activities process on physical assets and facilities development); part 3 (comfortability physical assets and facilities development) was address with parameter 12 to 15; parameter 16 to 20 focused on research question 4 (the level of maintenance culture in the institutions); parameter 21 to 26 answered research question 5 (global acceptability of the facilities) while parameter 27 to 30 addressed research question 6 (environmental safety and sanitation of the institutions). The expected mean of 2.50 assigned to the grade for agree or disagree was used. Any grade of 2.50 and above was taken to agree with the point while below 2.50 was disagree.

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

2. Metodologi
ini adalah survei deskriptif dirancang untuk mengumpulkan data dari opini siswa untuk mengukur kualitas pembangunan infrastruktur di empat perguruan tinggi di Fakultas Arsitektur Perencanaan dan Survei, UiTM Shah Alam. Mahasiswa tahun terakhir secara acak dipilih untuk penelitian ini. Mahasiswa tingkat akhir yang digunakan karena mereka telah di sekolah cukup lama untuk memiliki pengalaman yang cukup tentang lingkungan dan karena itu memiliki pengalaman yang memadai untuk merespon secara cerdas untuk daftar. Hasilnya disajikan dalam tabel sesuai dengan urutan penelitian. Aset fisik dan checklist fasilitas indikator pembangunan 'dan angket aset fisik dan kualitas fasilitas pengembangan kuesioner adalah instrumen yang digunakan untuk pengumpulan data. Ini berisi 30 parameter berdasarkan checklist kualitas aset fisik dan fasilitas pengembangan indikator 'menyikapi pertanyaan penelitian. Pertanyaan Penelitian Bagian 1 alamat perspektif pemangku kepentingan di fisik pembangunan aset dan fasilitas sebagaimana tercantum dalam parameter 1 sampai 7; parameter 8-11 disediakan jawaban untuk penelitian bagian (proses kegiatan inti pada aset fisik dan fasilitas pengembangan) 2; bagian 3 (kenyamanan aset dan fasilitas fisik pembangunan) adalah alamat dengan parameter 12 sampai 15; parameter 16 sampai 20 difokuskan pada pertanyaan penelitian 4 (tingkat budaya pemeliharaan di lembaga); parameter 21-26 menjawab pertanyaan penelitian 5 (penerimaan global fasilitas) sementara parameter 27-30 ditangani pertanyaan penelitian 6 (keamanan lingkungan dan sanitasi lembaga). Mean diharapkan dari 2,50 ditugaskan untuk kelas untuk setuju atau tidak setuju digunakan. Setiap kelas dari 2,50 dan di atas diambil setuju dengan titik sedangkan di bawah 2,50 adalah tidak setuju.