Hasil (
Bahasa Indonesia) 1:
[Salinan]Disalin!
Jurnal internasional bisnis dan ilmu sosial Vol. 3 No 6; [Khusus masalah - Maret 2012] Abstrak Perbedaan lintas-budaya dalam manajemen Tagreed Issa KawarPutri Sumaya Universitas Teknologi P. O. Box: 1438 Al Jubaiha 11941Amman-Jordan Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mempelajari perbedaan lintas-budaya dalam manajemen. Ada daerah di manajemendimana perbedaan terhadap sikap, perilaku, berfungsi, isu-isu komunikasi dan implikasi budayadapat dilihat. Perbedaan lintas budaya berasal dari berbagai latar belakang budaya masing-masing. Varietas budayadapat disaksikan di tempat kerja, dan faktor-faktor lain yang diperkenalkan seperti mencapai target penjualan, pertemuantenggat waktu, bekerja pada anggaran yang ketat, yang dapat menyebabkan konflik. Karena perbedaan budaya, mungkin adamenjadi semacam kesalahpahaman antara orang-orang yang bekerja di organisasi yang sama karena mereka nilai yang berbeda,keyakinan, latar belakang, dll. Untuk manajemen yang sukses, setiap orang harus mampu bekerja dengan orang-orang dariberbagai latar belakang budaya yang tidak peduli apa orientasi budaya mereka. Bukti ini adalah yang suksesManajemen banyak perusahaan Barat yang beroperasi di berbagai belahan dunia seperti Timur Tengah danmereka datang dengan hasil manajerial yang baik. Kata kunci: Perbedaan lintas-budaya, manajemen, budaya. 1. Pendahuluan Untuk mulai dengan, harus ada definisi yang baik dari ekspresi "budaya" yang dapat didefinisikan sebagai warisanvalues, concepts, and ways of living which are shared by people of the same social group. To make the definitionclearer, culture is divided into two kinds; the first is generic culture which is a shared culture of all humans livingon this planet. The second is local culturewhich refers to symbols and schemas shared by a particular socialgroup. As is known, the world is becoming nowadays a global village, in the sense that the technological achievementsof this modern time have brought people closer together. This also means that people from different parts of theworld and with different cultural backgrounds are working and communicating together. This fact is in a wayinteresting, but dealing with people from different cultures requires knowing the cultural diversities; for instancethe way we deal with them, what we say and what we should avoid saying, how to communicate and to be awareof the cultural taboos because what is accepted in one culture might not be accepted in another. What applies toevery day communication among cultures applies to communication in the workplace. Working with people in anorganization requires dealing with certain issues such as motivating employees, structuring policies anddeveloping strategies. In this case, there has to be a kind of understanding of the cultural diversities in order toapply the afore-mentioned issues in the workplace. To give a broader definition of the word culture, the word comes in two meanings. The first meaning is“civilization” which entails arts and crafts, education and manners. While the second meaning refers to the waypeople think, feel and act in accordance with the values and norms dominant in their society. AccordingtoHofstede Geert, culture is defined as “the collective programming of the mind distinguishing the members ofone group or category of people from another.” In simple words, culture refers to the values known to a certainethnic group of the same social background. Most of one’s culture is acquired during childhood, before puberty. Humans at an early age have the ability toabsorb cultural norms from their cultural surroundings, from parents, siblings, playmates…. etc. Therefore, culture helps people to function smoothly within a specific society. There are certain levels at which a culture canwork: 1.1 National level: It is well known that national cultures differ at the level of unconscious values whichare acquired during childhood and these national cultures are stable, the afterward changes that occurare practices whereby the underlying values are left untouched. 105 The Special Issue on Contemporary Research in Business and Economics © Centre for Promoting Ideas, USA 1.2 Organizational level: Organizational cultures differ at the level of practices which can be described assuperficial and they are to some extent manageable. These organizational cultures differ from one company tothe other within the same country. 106 1.3 Occupational level: This kind of culture comes between the national and organizational cultures; getting intoan occupation such as teaching requires the social values acquired coupled with the practices of theorganization. 1.4 Gender level: Gender differences are recognized within the same culture, there is what can be called a men’sculture that differs from a women’s culture. Technically, men and women have the ability to perform thesame tasks at the workplace, but they have differences when it comes to responding to the symbols used insociety. The differences between men and women highly depend on the national culture of the country. 2. Cross-cultural Differences in Multi-national Corporations Geert Hofstede is a sociologist who studied employees working in a multi-national corporation (Reynolds &Valentine, 2011). He described four ways that can help in analysing and understanding other cultures as follows: 2.1 Individualism vs. Collectivism: In some cultures, the individual is emphasized while in others thegroup is emphasized. 2.2 Power distance: The culture that believes that organizational power should be distributed unequally. 2.3 Uncertainty avoidance: Hofstede found that some cultures tend to accept change as a challenge whileothers don’t. 2.4 Masculinity vs. Femininity: Hofstede himself tends to reject the terms “masculine” and “feminine”. These two terms should be overlooked in order to value other issues which are more important to theorganization such as achievement and assertiveness. Since culture may be defined as “the inherited values, concepts, and ways of living which are shared by people ofthe same social group.” Culture is not possessed by a certain social class; in fact each and every person has notonly one culture but cultures which causes the complexity of the term. Culture can be defined as “dynamic” in thesense that it changes over time, this change in culture might also lead to conflict. In order to better understand culture, there has to be an understanding of the conflicts that may arise due todifferences among cultures. According to Avruch (1998), who wrote a paper on cross- cultural conflict, he definesconflict as follows: “a competition by groups or individuals over incompatible goals, scarce resources, or the resourcesof power needed to acquire them. This competition is also determined by individuals’ perceptions ofgoals, resources, and power and such perceptions may differ greatly among individuals. Onedeterminant of perception is culture, the socially inherited, shared and learned ways of livingpossessed by individuals in virtue of their membership in social groups.” To give a definition of the word conflict, it is a characteristic that can be found in any human society and mayoccur as a result of any kind of social interaction. Conflict that might take place among cultures might faceproblems of intercultural miscommunication and misunderstanding. Such problems will cause an increasedconflict. In addition, culture may work as a link between what we call “an individual identity” to “collectiveones”. In order to understand the complexity of conflict, it has to be born in mind that conflict is not a matter ofthe one who wins takes it all, so conflict involves both competition and cooperation mixed together (Avruch,1998). In order to narrow the scope of this research, the conflict that might happen between individuals from differentcultural backgrounds can be considered a “cross-cultural conflict”. Conflict may occur within the same socialgroup according to different criteria: such as families; language; religion; ethnicity; nationality; socioeconomiccharacteristics; education; occupation among others. Thus, any society is made up of various “subcultures”, byvirtue members of any society are “multicultural”. International Journal of Business and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 6; [Special Issue -March 2012] 3. Cross-cultural Management According to Nancy Adler (2008), she gives a good definition of cross cultural management: “Cross-cultural management explains the behavior of people in organizations around the worldand shows people how to work in organizations with employees and client populations from manydifferent cultures.” The importance of cross-cultural management lies in the on-growing co-operation between companies in differentcountries where difficulties may arise because of the different cultural backgrounds. One of the well-known researchers in the field of culture and management is Geert Hofstede (1980). Therefore,Hofstede’s work is considered indispensable to any study on culture and management. He developed what iscalled a “dimensional approach to cross-cultural comparisons.” As the world is witnessing nowadays “globalization”, more and more companies are being run in different placesall around the world. This will result in more activities all over the world which result in communication acrosscultures. Culture is something that human beings learn and as a result, learning requires communication andcommunication is a way of coding and decoding language as well as symbols used in that language. For example,humans communicate through many means other than language such as facial expressions, gestures, bodylanguage, posture etc. I
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8ffb/d8ffb1a0e0c5bb2ea1157da16a04ec4b5a09e7aa" alt=""