tries to specify the most problems

tries to specify the most problems encountered in the students vocabulary. From the result of that test they have made, the writer will make a conclusion about the influence translating short story to improve the students’ vocabulary. There are some techniques to analyze data that the writer uses:
Students correct answer
Score: X 100
Total test items



Tabulating and classifying the students score into the following classification:
The classified of Score
No Score of Range Classification
1 96-100 Excellent
2 86-95 Very good
3 76-85 Good
4 66-75 Fairly good
5 56-65 Fair
6 36-55 Fairly poor
7 0-35 Poor

Found the percentage of the students’ score:
F
P = — x 100
N

Where:
P = percentage
F = frequency
N = the total number of the students

Calculating the mean score of the students answer by using the following formula:
M= (∑(x))/N

Where:
M : Mean Score
∑(x) : The sum of total score
N : Number of students


Calculating the standard deviation of students’ pre-test and post-test by using the following formula:

SD = √((∑▒〖〖x_1〗^2-〖(∑▒x_1 )〗^2/n〗)/(n-1))

Where: SS: sum of squares
N: total number of sample

Hypothesis in this research using t-test by the following formula:
t=(x ̅_1-x ̅_2)/√(1/n_1 +1/n_2 )

Where:
S = Standard deviation
x ̅_1 = The average of value group learning
x ̅_2 = The average of value individual learning
n_1 = Number of students in group learning
n_2 = Number of students in individual learning

The testing hypothesis criteria are as follows:
If ttest ≥ ttable, the hypothesis is accepted. It means that there is significant improvement of students vocabulary mastery through translation short story in of SMAN 4 Baubau.
If ttest ≤ ttable, the hypothesis is rejected. It means that there is not significant improvement of students vocabulary mastery through translation short story in of SMAN 4 Baubau.

 

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1:

tries to specify the most problems encountered in the students vocabulary. From the result of that test they have made, the writer will make a conclusion about the influence translating short story to improve the students’ vocabulary. There are some techniques to analyze data that the writer uses: Students correct answer Score: X 100 Total test items Tabulating and classifying the students score into the following classification:The classified of Score No Score of Range Classification1 96-100 Excellent2 86-95 Very good3 76-85 Good4 66-75 Fairly good5 56-65 Fair6 36-55 Fairly poor7 0-35 Poor Found the percentage of the students’ score: FP = — x 100 NWhere: P = percentage F = frequency N = the total number of the students Calculating the mean score of the students answer by using the following formula: M= (∑(x))/NWhere:M : Mean Score ∑(x) : The sum of total scoreN : Number of students Calculating the standard deviation of students’ pre-test and post-test by using the following formula: SD = √((∑▒〖〖x_1〗^2-〖(∑▒x_1 )〗^2/n〗)/(n-1))Where: SS: sum of squares N: total number of sample Hypothesis in this research using t-test by the following formula: t=(x ̅_1-x ̅_2)/√(1/n_1 +1/n_2 )Where:S = Standard deviationx ̅_1 = The average of value group learningx ̅_2 = The average of value individual learningn_1 = Number of students in group learningn_2 = Number of students in individual learningPengujian hipotesis kriteria adalah sebagai berikut: Jika ttest ≥ ttable, hipotesis diterima. Itu berarti bahwa ada peningkatan yang signifikan penguasaan Kosakata siswa melalui cerita pendek terjemahan di SMAN 4 Baubau. Jika ttest ≤ ttable, hipotesis ditolak. Itu berarti bahwa tidak ada peningkatan yang signifikan penguasaan Kosakata siswa melalui cerita pendek terjemahan di SMAN 4 Baubau. 

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:

mencoba untuk menentukan yang paling masalah yang dihadapi dalam kosakata siswa. Dari hasil tes yang telah mereka buat, penulis akan membuat kesimpulan tentang pengaruh menerjemahkan cerita pendek untuk meningkatkan kosakata siswa. Ada beberapa teknik untuk menganalisis data yang penulis menggunakan:
Mahasiswa jawaban yang benar
Score: X 100
Jumlah item tes Tabulating dan mengklasifikasikan siswa skor ditetapkan sebagai berikut: The diklasifikasikan Skor No Skor Range Klasifikasi 1 96-100 biasa 2 86- 95 Sangat baik 3 76-85 Baik 4 66-75 Cukup baik 5 56-65 Adil 6 36-55 Cukup miskin 7 0-35 Miskin Ditemukan persentase skor siswa: F P = - x 100 N Dimana: P = Persentase F = frekuensi N = jumlah siswa Menghitung nilai rata-rata siswa menjawab dengan menggunakan rumus berikut: M = (Σ (x)) / N Dimana: M: Berarti Skor Σ (x): Jumlah total skor N: Jumlah siswa Menghitung deviasi standar pre-test dan post-test siswa dengan menggunakan rumus berikut: SD = √ ((Σ▒ 〖〖x_1〗 ^ 2 - 〖(Σ▒x_1)〗 ^ 2 / n〗) / (n-1)) Dimana: SS: jumlah kuadrat N: jumlah sampel Hipotesis dalam penelitian ini menggunakan t-test dengan rumus berikut: t = (x ̅_1-x ̅_2) / √ (1 / n_1 + 1 / n_2) Dimana: S = Standar deviasi x ̅_1 = rata-rata dari kelompok belajar nilai x ̅_2 = rata-rata nilai pembelajaran individual n_1 = Jumlah siswa dalam belajar kelompok n_2 = Jumlah siswa di masing-masing belajar Pengujian hipotesis kriteria adalah sebagai berikut: Jika ttest ≥ ttabel, hipotesis diterima. Ini berarti bahwa ada peningkatan yang signifikan dari siswa penguasaan kosakata melalui terjemahan cerita pendek di SMAN 4 Baubau. Jika ttest ≤ ttabel, hipotesis ditolak. Ini berarti bahwa tidak ada peningkatan yang signifikan dari siswa penguasaan kosakata melalui terjemahan cerita pendek di SMAN 4 Baubau.