Hasil (
Bahasa Indonesia) 1:
[Salinan]Disalin!
ConclusionThe present study examines how key intergroup perception variables concerning immigrants predict majority mem- bers’ attitudes toward proactive integration. Our findings, based upon correlational and multiple regression analysis, indicate significant relationships between perceived out- group entitativity and perception of outgroup good will (warmth) and competence and MIE attitudes. Future exper- imental studies could examine whether the relationship be- tween counterstereotypic variables and entitativity con- cerns questions of a potential bidirectional influence, or the role of warmth as a mediator of entitativity effects as ob- served in our study. Furthermore, combining the disposi- tional and contextual antecedent traditions into one model by looking at interactions between the intergroup situation (Meeus et al., 2009) with personality factors (e.g., Ekeham- mer & Akrami, 2007; Hodson, 2009; Sibley & Duckitt,2008) would be beneficial to better understand and predictMIE attitudes.In conclusion, we assume that the two strongest predic- tors of MIE attitudes – perceptions of the integration inten- tions of immigrants and perceived entitativity of immi- grants as a group – may be applied in everyday life to im- prove intergroup relations (e.g., through the media, public policy etc., see also ECRI, 2009; DID, 2009; OSI, 2010). However, there may be unintended negative consequences, as positive or corrective portrayals of immigrants may be perceived as subtle attempts by those in power to manipu- late majority attitudes. If people hold “wrong,” but deeply rooted beliefs about immigrants, corrective information may backfire and even strengthen those beliefs further (Ny- han & Reifler, 2010). Moreover, the portrayal of counter- stereotypic information may have another unintended ef- fect by legitimizing passive behavior such as neglect (Cud- dy et al., 2007), which would allow an unjust status quo to remain unchallenged. Along these lines, the Norwegian right-wing politician, Carl I. Hagen, has used such “posi- informasi tive"mengungkapkan bahwa imigran tidak lagi"disayangkan"dan bisa mengkritik (Stokke, 2010). Oleh karena itu, positif penggambaran imigran juga menjalankan bahaya melegitimasi retorika populis yang lebih lanjut dapat menghambat akomodasi ma-jority. Media karena itu harus re-berpikiran implikasi mungkin untuk percep-tion antarkelompok dan sikap mayoritas ketika melaporkan imigran. Sementara kesadaran dari kelemahan potensial ini sangat penting, sekarang temuan menunjukkan bahwa persepsi dari pos-itive Kejuaraan niat integrasi imigran dan heterogene-ity imigran mempromosikan dukungan mayoritas lebih untuk pro-aktif integrasi usaha.PengakuanPenulis ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada para mahasiswa psikologi klinis yang membantu dalam pengumpulan data.
Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..