ConclusionThe present study examine

Conclusion

The present study examines how key intergroup perception variables concerning immigrants predict majority mem- bers’ attitudes toward proactive integration. Our findings, based upon correlational and multiple regression analysis, indicate significant relationships between perceived out- group entitativity and perception of outgroup good will (warmth) and competence and MIE attitudes. Future exper- imental studies could examine whether the relationship be- tween counterstereotypic variables and entitativity con- cerns questions of a potential bidirectional influence, or the role of warmth as a mediator of entitativity effects as ob- served in our study. Furthermore, combining the disposi- tional and contextual antecedent traditions into one model by looking at interactions between the intergroup situation (Meeus et al., 2009) with personality factors (e.g., Ekeham- mer & Akrami, 2007; Hodson, 2009; Sibley & Duckitt,
2008) would be beneficial to better understand and predict
MIE attitudes.
In conclusion, we assume that the two strongest predic- tors of MIE attitudes – perceptions of the integration inten- tions of immigrants and perceived entitativity of immi- grants as a group – may be applied in everyday life to im- prove intergroup relations (e.g., through the media, public policy etc., see also ECRI, 2009; DID, 2009; OSI, 2010). However, there may be unintended negative consequences, as positive or corrective portrayals of immigrants may be perceived as subtle attempts by those in power to manipu- late majority attitudes. If people hold “wrong,” but deeply rooted beliefs about immigrants, corrective information may backfire and even strengthen those beliefs further (Ny- han & Reifler, 2010). Moreover, the portrayal of counter- stereotypic information may have another unintended ef- fect by legitimizing passive behavior such as neglect (Cud- dy et al., 2007), which would allow an unjust status quo to remain unchallenged. Along these lines, the Norwegian right-wing politician, Carl I. Hagen, has used such “posi-

tive” information to express that immigrants are no longer “unfortunate” and can be criticized (Stokke, 2010). Hence, positive portrayals of immigrants also run the danger of legitimizing populist rhetoric that could further hinder ma- jority accommodation. The media should therefore be re- minded of the possible implications for intergroup percep- tion and majority attitudes when reporting on immigrants. While awareness of these potential drawbacks is critical, the present findings indicate that the perception of the pos- itive integration intentions of immigrants and heterogene- ity of immigrants promotes more majority support for pro- active integration efforts.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the clinical psychology students who assisted in data collection.

Conclusion

The present study examines how key intergroup perception variables concerning immigrants predict majority mem- bers’ attitudes toward proactive integration. Our findings, based upon correlational and multiple regression analysis, indicate significant relationships between perceived out- group entitativity and perception of outgroup good will (warmth) and competence and MIE attitudes. Future exper- imental studies could examine whether the relationship be- tween counterstereotypic variables and entitativity con- cerns questions of a potential bidirectional influence, or the role of warmth as a mediator of entitativity effects as ob- served in our study. Furthermore, combining the disposi- tional and contextual antecedent traditions into one model by looking at interactions between the intergroup situation (Meeus et al., 2009) with personality factors (e.g., Ekeham- mer & Akrami, 2007; Hodson, 2009; Sibley & Duckitt,
2008) would be beneficial to better understand and predict
MIE attitudes.
In conclusion, we assume that the two strongest predic- tors of MIE attitudes – perceptions of the integration inten- tions of immigrants and perceived entitativity of immi- grants as a group – may be applied in everyday life to im- prove intergroup relations (e.g., through the media, public policy etc., see also ECRI, 2009; DID, 2009; OSI, 2010). However, there may be unintended negative consequences, as positive or corrective portrayals of immigrants may be perceived as subtle attempts by those in power to manipu- late majority attitudes. If people hold “wrong,” but deeply rooted beliefs about immigrants, corrective information may backfire and even strengthen those beliefs further (Ny- han & Reifler, 2010). Moreover, the portrayal of counter- stereotypic information may have another unintended ef- fect by legitimizing passive behavior such as neglect (Cud- dy et al., 2007), which would allow an unjust status quo to remain unchallenged. Along these lines, the Norwegian right-wing politician, Carl I. Hagen, has used such “posi-

tive” information to express that immigrants are no longer “unfortunate” and can be criticized (Stokke, 2010). Hence, positive portrayals of immigrants also run the danger of legitimizing populist rhetoric that could further hinder ma- jority accommodation. The media should therefore be re- minded of the possible implications for intergroup percep- tion and majority attitudes when reporting on immigrants. While awareness of these potential drawbacks is critical, the present findings indicate that the perception of the pos- itive integration intentions of immigrants and heterogene- ity of immigrants promotes more majority support for pro- active integration efforts.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank the clinical psychology students who assisted in data collection.

0/5000

Dari: -

Ke: -

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 1: [Salinan]

Disalin!

KesimpulanPenelitian ini meneliti bagaimana kunci persepsi antarkelompok variabel mengenai imigran memprediksi mayoritas mem-bers' sikap proaktif integrasi. Temuan kami, berdasarkan correlational dan analisis regresi, menunjukkan hubungan yang signifikan antara dirasakan-kelompok entitativity dan persepsi dari outgroup akan baik (kehangatan) dan kompetensi dan sikap MIE. Studi masa depan exper-imental bisa memeriksa apakah hubungan menjadi-tween counterstereotypic variabel dan entitativity con-mereka pertanyaan bidirectional potensi mempengaruhi, atau peran kehangatan sebagai mediator entitativity efek sebagai ob - disajikan dalam penelitian kami. Selain itu, menggabungkan disposi-mem dan kontekstual yg tradisi menjadi salah satu model dengan melihat interaksi antara situasi antarkelompok (Meeus et al., 2009) dengan faktor-faktor kepribadian (misalnya, Ekeham-mer & Akrami, 2007; Hodson, 2009; Sibley & Duckitt,2008) akan bermanfaat untuk lebih memahami dan memprediksiSikap MIE.Kesimpulannya, kita berasumsi bahwa dua terkuat predic-tur sikap MIE-persepsi integrasi inten-tions imigran dan dianggap entitativity immi-hibah sebagai kelompok – dapat diterapkan dalam kehidupan sehari-hari untuk im - membuktikan hubungan antarkelompok (misalnya, melalui media, kebijakan publik dll, lihat juga ECRI, 2009; LAKUKAN, 2009; OSI, 2010). Namun, mungkin ada konsekuensi negatif yang tidak diinginkan, seperti penggambaran positif atau korektif imigran mungkin dianggap sebagai upaya halus oleh mereka yang berkuasa untuk manipu - akhir mayoritas sikap. Jika orang-orang memegang keyakinan "salah", tapi berakar tentang imigran, korektif informasi mungkin menjadi bumerang dan bahkan memperkuat mereka keyakinan lebih lanjut (Ny - han & Reifler, 2010). Selain itu, penggambaran counter - informasi stereotypic mungkin memiliki lain tidak diinginkan ef-fect oleh melegitimasi pasif perilaku seperti mengabaikan (Cud-dy et al., 2007), yang akan memungkinkan status quo tidak adil untuk tetap tak tertandingi. Sepanjang jalur tersebut, Norwegia sayap kanan politisi, Carl I. Hagen, telah digunakan seperti "loterei- informasi tive"mengungkapkan bahwa imigran tidak lagi"disayangkan"dan bisa mengkritik (Stokke, 2010). Oleh karena itu, positif penggambaran imigran juga menjalankan bahaya melegitimasi retorika populis yang lebih lanjut dapat menghambat akomodasi ma-jority. Media karena itu harus re-berpikiran implikasi mungkin untuk percep-tion antarkelompok dan sikap mayoritas ketika melaporkan imigran. Sementara kesadaran dari kelemahan potensial ini sangat penting, sekarang temuan menunjukkan bahwa persepsi dari pos-itive Kejuaraan niat integrasi imigran dan heterogene-ity imigran mempromosikan dukungan mayoritas lebih untuk pro-aktif integrasi usaha.PengakuanPenulis ingin mengucapkan terima kasih kepada para mahasiswa psikologi klinis yang membantu dalam pengumpulan data.

Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 2:[Salinan]

Disalin!

Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..

Hasil (Bahasa Indonesia) 3:[Salinan]

Disalin!

Sedang diterjemahkan, harap tunggu..

Bahasa lainnya

Dukungan alat penerjemahan: Afrikans, Albania, Amhara, Arab, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahasa Indonesia, Basque, Belanda, Belarussia, Bengali, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Burma, Cebuano, Ceko, Chichewa, China, Cina Tradisional, Denmark, Deteksi bahasa, Esperanto, Estonia, Farsi, Finlandia, Frisia, Gaelig, Gaelik Skotlandia, Galisia, Georgia, Gujarati, Hausa, Hawaii, Hindi, Hmong, Ibrani, Igbo, Inggris, Islan, Italia, Jawa, Jepang, Jerman, Kannada, Katala, Kazak, Khmer, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Klingon, Korea, Korsika, Kreol Haiti, Kroat, Kurdi, Laos, Latin, Latvia, Lituania, Luksemburg, Magyar, Makedonia, Malagasi, Malayalam, Malta, Maori, Marathi, Melayu, Mongol, Nepal, Norsk, Odia (Oriya), Pashto, Polandia, Portugis, Prancis, Punjabi, Rumania, Rusia, Samoa, Serb, Sesotho, Shona, Sindhi, Sinhala, Slovakia, Slovenia, Somali, Spanyol, Sunda, Swahili, Swensk, Tagalog, Tajik, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Turki, Turkmen, Ukraina, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnam, Wales, Xhosa, Yiddi, Yoruba, Yunani, Zulu, Bahasa terjemahan.